Speechless and glad I was never near the man to hear him say 'his last words'
Sarge69
venturer9 wrote:
http://m.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/11/25/liberal-professor-tells-white-male-students-commit-suicide-benefit-so
This is who we send our children to to be educated....
Mike
He looked white to me. Let's start with him.
Lmarc
Loc: Ojojona, Honduras
Hmmmm....guess that makes ME a white supremacist. :roll: :roll:
Lmarc wrote:
Hmmmm....guess that makes ME a white supremacist. :roll: :roll:
This guy is among a large group of scholars who see race not as a scientific fact, but a social one. It's an interesting idea that makes a lot of sense when you read about it. It's easy to take his words at face value and be aghast. But look a little deeper at what he has been saying:
"We do not hate you or anyone else for the color of her skin. What we hate is a system that confers privileges (and burdens) on people because of their color. It is not fair skin that makes people white; it is fair skin in a certain kind of society, one that attaches social importance to skin color.
When we say we want to abolish the white race, we do not mean we want to exterminate people with fair skin(my emphasis). We mean that we want to do away with the social meaning of skin color, thereby
abolishing the white race as a social category(again my emphasis). Consider this parallel: To be against royalty does not mean wanting to kill the king. It means wanting to do away with crowns, thrones, titles, and the privileges attached to them. In our view, whiteness has a lot in common with royalty: they are both social formations that carry unearned advantages".
Now, asking people to commit suicide sounds pretty crazy, and I would be interested in seeing if what he said was truly what he believed, or if it was something taken out of context. On the surface it sounds pretty crazy, but I think this probably requires a more nuanced investigation than just citing a couple of lines from a speech.
tschmath wrote:
This guy is among a large group of scholars who see race not as a scientific fact, but a social one. It's an interesting idea that makes a lot of sense when you read about it. It's easy to take his words at face value and be aghast. But look a little deeper at what he has been saying:
"We do not hate you or anyone else for the color of her skin. What we hate is a system that confers privileges (and burdens) on people because of their color. It is not fair skin that makes people white; it is fair skin in a certain kind of society, one that attaches social importance to skin color. When we say we want to abolish the white race, we do not mean we want to exterminate people with fair skin(my emphasis). We mean that we want to do away with the social meaning of skin color, thereby abolishing the white race as a social category(again my emphasis). Consider this parallel: To be against royalty does not mean wanting to kill the king. It means wanting to do away with crowns, thrones, titles, and the privileges attached to them. In our view, whiteness has a lot in common with royalty: they are both social formations that carry unearned advantages".
Now, asking people to commit suicide sounds pretty crazy, and I would be interested in seeing if what he said was truly what he believed, or if it was something taken out of context. On the surface it sounds pretty crazy, but I think this probably requires a more nuanced investigation than just citing a couple of lines from a speech.
This guy is among a large group of scholars who se... (
show quote)
You call them scholers,I call them Massholes.
tschmath wrote:
This guy is among a large group of scholars who see race not as a scientific fact, but a social one. It's an interesting idea that makes a lot of sense when you read about it. It's easy to take his words at face value and be aghast. But look a little deeper at what he has been saying:
"We do not hate you or anyone else for the color of her skin. What we hate is a system that confers privileges (and burdens) on people because of their color. It is not fair skin that makes people white; it is fair skin in a certain kind of society, one that attaches social importance to skin color. When we say we want to abolish the white race, we do not mean we want to exterminate people with fair skin(my emphasis). We mean that we want to do away with the social meaning of skin color, thereby abolishing the white race as a social category(again my emphasis). Consider this parallel: To be against royalty does not mean wanting to kill the king. It means wanting to do away with crowns, thrones, titles, and the privileges attached to them. In our view, whiteness has a lot in common with royalty: they are both social formations that carry unearned advantages".
Now, asking people to commit suicide sounds pretty crazy, and I would be interested in seeing if what he said was truly what he believed, or if it was something taken out of context. On the surface it sounds pretty crazy, but I think this probably requires a more nuanced investigation than just citing a couple of lines from a speech.
This guy is among a large group of scholars who se... (
show quote)
What you say is right tschmath and I have to agree with you. So, lets get rid of this non-sense about skin color. From now on, everyone is WHITE, no more black since white is the absences of color and black is all the colors. That way, we no longer think of color since white is not a color.
You really make sense tschmath...
pigpen wrote:
He looked white to me. Let's start with him.
In the article, it tells that he is White..?????
Mike
tschmath... said in part...: Now, asking people to commit suicide sounds pretty crazy, and I would be interested in seeing if what he said was truly what he believed, or if it was something taken out of context. On the surface it sounds pretty crazy, but I think this probably requires a more nuanced investigation than just citing a couple of lines from a speech.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Did you read the article... It went into more depth as to what he has done now and in the past...
Mike
One good thing I can say about the man that with him being white and at his age, he will soon fulfill his own wish. He will be dead. Well, good for him!
n3eg
Loc: West coast USA
Just another communist bloviator whose ultimate goal is the destruction of society, only he's trying to slip it under the door as the race card. Yawn.
tschmath wrote:
But look a little deeper at what he has been saying:
"We do not hate you or anyone else for the color of her skin. What we hate is a system that confers privileges (and burdens) on people because of their color. It is not fair skin that makes people white; it is fair skin in a certain kind of society, one that attaches social importance to skin color. When we say we want to abolish the white race, we do not mean we want to exterminate people with fair skin(my emphasis). We mean that we want to do away with the social meaning of skin color, thereby abolishing the white race as a social category(again my emphasis). Consider this parallel: To be against royalty does not mean wanting to kill the king. It means wanting to do away with crowns, thrones, titles, and the privileges attached to them. In our view, whiteness has a lot in common with royalty: they are both social formations that carry unearned advantages".
But look a little deeper at what he has been sayi... (
show quote)
If that is what he means, then he is a poor professor. To be so grossly misunderstood, as is his contention here, demonstrates a certain lack of quality of thought and a certain imprecision in the use of the English language. That this is a defense of a university level professor is an unmitigated shame.
BboH
Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
fanatical egotist desperately seeking attention.
Build concentration camps, put white mails in them, build ovens cook them, oh wait that has been tried, sorry. :-D
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.