Playing with color & depth of field
Nov 22, 2013 17:37:23 #
Took these photos with film and did PP in my viewfinder and I was limited in what I could do. Now with digital the possibilities are endless and your eyes and mind are the limits you can accomplish.
Am trying some PP and if they are pleasing shall post or should I forget.
Am trying some PP and if they are pleasing shall post or should I forget.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
Nov 22, 2013 18:00:09 #
Nov 22, 2013 18:05:52 #
Nov 22, 2013 18:37:45 #
Nov 22, 2013 18:46:10 #
Heirloom, I tried soft focusing to see how the depth of field affected the colors, I was more interested in manipulating the colors, I enjoyed the results, have a few more which I shall post tomorrow.
Now enjoying doing PP in Photoshop, just endless results.
Now enjoying doing PP in Photoshop, just endless results.
Nov 22, 2013 19:46:06 #
Hummingbird-eyes wrote:
Heirloom, I tried soft focusing to see how the depth of field affected the colors, I was more interested in manipulating the colors, I enjoyed the results, have a few more which I shall post tomorrow.
Now enjoying doing PP in Photoshop, just endless results.
Now enjoying doing PP in Photoshop, just endless results.
It's fun, isn't it? Looking forwarding to seeing what you come up with.
Nov 22, 2013 21:06:48 #
It looks like you introduced some Motion Blur as well as shallow DOF.
Nov 23, 2013 08:10:31 #
Nov 23, 2013 09:52:59 #
Very neat. My favorites are #1 and 3. Looking forward to more :)
Nov 23, 2013 13:49:14 #
BobYankle:
You are right, I introduced some camera movement into a few photos, now years later I think that action is there whether I like it or not.
Would need to use a tripod now, problem is in most cases my lens front was 1" from the subject, would need to be a rubber tripod.
You are right, I introduced some camera movement into a few photos, now years later I think that action is there whether I like it or not.
Would need to use a tripod now, problem is in most cases my lens front was 1" from the subject, would need to be a rubber tripod.
Nov 23, 2013 14:08:51 #
Linda from Maine:
They are on their way, glad you enjoyed. :)
They are on their way, glad you enjoyed. :)
Nov 23, 2013 14:52:33 #
Hummingbird-eyes wrote:
BobYankle:
You are right, I introduced some camera movement into a few photos, now years later I think that action is there whether I like it or not.
Would need to use a tripod now, problem is in most cases my lens front was 1" from the subject, would need to be a rubber tripod.
You are right, I introduced some camera movement into a few photos, now years later I think that action is there whether I like it or not.
Would need to use a tripod now, problem is in most cases my lens front was 1" from the subject, would need to be a rubber tripod.
Or a tracking motor like the astrophotographers use. It would have to be pretty darn fast to keep up with windblown flowers however.
Nov 23, 2013 18:19:24 #
Clynro wrote:
I really like #2. Well done.
Well yeah, #2 is the only one with ANYTHING in focus.
MD
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.