Exercise in Dof, I don't know if this helps with questions in Grahams post
Nov 21, 2013 15:23:26 #
Shot through wire. Both shot at f2.8, 1/125ss, ISO100 (auto)
#1 70mm focal length
#2 185mm focal length
Nikon D7000, Sigma 70-200 f2.8
#1 70mm focal length
#2 185mm focal length
Nikon D7000, Sigma 70-200 f2.8
shot at 70mm
shot at 185mm
Nov 21, 2013 17:39:02 #
wonkytripod wrote:
Shot through wire. Both shot at f2.8, 1/125ss, ISO100 (auto)
#1 70mm focal length
#2 185mm focal length
Nikon D7000, Sigma 70-200 f2.8
#1 70mm focal length
#2 185mm focal length
Nikon D7000, Sigma 70-200 f2.8
Okay, first off, I had quite a chuckle at this little cutie staring back at me when I clicked on the topic.
Secondly, thank you Andrew. I appreciate this. A picture is worth a 1000 words, so this is worth 2,000.
One question. Were you standing in the exact same spot for both shots?
Nov 22, 2013 04:45:10 #
Nightski wrote:
Okay, first off, I had quite a chuckle at this little cutie staring back at me when I clicked on the topic.
Secondly, thank you Andrew. I appreciate this. A picture is worth a 1000 words, so this is worth 2,000.
One question. Were you standing in the exact same spot for both shots?
Secondly, thank you Andrew. I appreciate this. A picture is worth a 1000 words, so this is worth 2,000.
One question. Were you standing in the exact same spot for both shots?
Thanks Sandra, Yes I was in the same spot. The only movement I made was to twist the zoom ring to zoom in from the wide angle to the tight shot. My lens hood was firmly pushed in to the wire of the enclosure to be able to focus it out.
Nov 22, 2013 07:00:58 #
wonkytripod wrote:
Shot through wire. Both shot at f2.8, 1/125ss, ISO100 (auto)
#1 70mm focal length
#2 185mm focal length
Nikon D7000, Sigma 70-200 f2.8
#1 70mm focal length
#2 185mm focal length
Nikon D7000, Sigma 70-200 f2.8
I rather don't think you would want to hear my comment on these so I will abstain unless you specifically ask. Rob.
Nov 22, 2013 07:10:47 #
winterrose wrote:
I rather don't think you would want to hear my comment on these so I will abstain unless you specifically ask. Rob.
Your comments are always welcome as long as you keep your criticisms to the technique, and refrain from insults to the poster. :-)
Nov 22, 2013 07:12:32 #
Nightski wrote:
Your comments are always welcome as long as you keep your criticisms to the technique, and refrain from insults to the poster. :-)
When have I ever tried to insult someone asking for help or advice?
Nov 22, 2013 07:15:49 #
winterrose wrote:
When have I ever tried to insult someone asking for help or advice?
Why Rob, you've been a perfect gentleman. I was just trying to guess why you think your comment wouldn't be welcome.
Nov 22, 2013 07:23:56 #
winterrose wrote:
I rather don't think you would want to hear my comment on these so I will abstain unless you specifically ask. Rob.
Hi Rob. Always happy to hear the truth. I know what I think is wrong with the shots but if no one comments how do I learn.
If you don't want to make them public PM them to me. I am old enough and ugly enough not to worry, I can always ignore them if I don't agree.
Nov 22, 2013 07:25:25 #
Nightski wrote:
Why Rob, you've been a perfect gentleman. I was just trying to guess why you think your comment wouldn't be welcome.
It's just that after my recent two button reset I've become all soft and fluffy inside, cautious to say anything that may hurt someone's feelings.
Nov 22, 2013 07:26:32 #
winterrose wrote:
It's just that after my recent two button reset I've become all soft and fluffy inside, cautious to say anything that may hurt someone's feelings.
Hi Rob, no sense no feelings :lol: :lol:
Nov 22, 2013 07:40:50 #
Hi Andrew, would you kindly provide your images having ticked the download box please.
Nov 22, 2013 08:04:08 #
winterrose wrote:
Hi Andrew, would you kindly provide your images having ticked the download box please.
Here they are Rob.
Nov 22, 2013 09:17:49 #
Nov 22, 2013 09:35:49 #
winterrose wrote:
.
Hi Rob, I can see the difference with your pping, but also wanted to read your thoughts as well. I have to admit that my competencies and enthusiasm for image manipulation is limited as are the processing software packages that I have at the moment.
Nov 22, 2013 09:39:08 #
wonkytripod wrote:
Hi Rob, I can see the difference with your pping, but also wanted to read your thoughts as well. I have to admit that my competencies and enthusiasm for image manipulation is limited as are the processing software packages that I have at the moment.
I did those quickly for illustration and if you can bear with me I will write my thoughts tomorrow. Been a big day. Tomorrow then. Rob
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.