Was there ever a Palestine?
Nov 5, 2013 08:34:26 #
Nov 5, 2013 09:55:27 #
That was very interesting. While 400 year in Egypt, the Palestine moved in, displacing those who had remain. The Israels had to move then out.
Nov 5, 2013 10:04:31 #
It would take more than one rather obscure book from the 17th century to rewrite extensively researched history.
On the other hand, some people simply believe what they want to believe. Anything that remotely looks like evidence is considered solid proof if it happens to support that belief. Contrary evidence is ignored.
On the other hand, some people simply believe what they want to believe. Anything that remotely looks like evidence is considered solid proof if it happens to support that belief. Contrary evidence is ignored.
Nov 5, 2013 10:47:53 #
Nov 7, 2013 01:38:57 #
rook2c4 wrote:
It would take more than one rather obscure book from the 17th century to rewrite extensively researched history.
On the other hand, some people simply believe what they want to believe. Anything that remotely looks like evidence is considered solid proof if it happens to support that belief. Contrary evidence is ignored.
On the other hand, some people simply believe what they want to believe. Anything that remotely looks like evidence is considered solid proof if it happens to support that belief. Contrary evidence is ignored.
Just like the one called BIBLE.
Nov 7, 2013 07:19:06 #
Bunko.T wrote:
Just like the one called BIBLE.
This is not a discussion on the Bible nor on Religion. History.
Nov 7, 2013 09:03:41 #
newuser wrote:
The State Department just announced and additional 75 million in aid for Palestine. I wonder how many more rockets they can buy with that money to attack Israel? This administration is brain dead!
Nov 7, 2013 19:33:40 #
Bangee5 wrote:
This is not a discussion on the Bible nor on Religion. History.
It's about books of uncertain authority or believe-ability.
Some are sceptical about the authenticity of this book. One is within ones rights to question that other "Book" & it's credibility.
Nov 7, 2013 20:55:31 #
Bunko.T wrote:
It's about books of uncertain authority or believe-ability.
Some are sceptical about the authenticity of this book. One is within ones rights to question that other "Book" & it's credibility.
Some are sceptical about the authenticity of this book. One is within ones rights to question that other "Book" & it's credibility.
Historians read books, they dig and find artifacts and tablets and they study and compare notes and tablets and other books. What is written in one book is proof of what is in other books. The historical facts of the bible are found to be true by comparison.
You are skeptical by desire, because you do not want the bible to be true. Because you do not believe in who this 'Book' speaks of, you want to prove the book to be wrong. Good luck with that.
But the topic is about Palestine, not the Bible although we compare of what is in the Bible about Palestine.
Nov 7, 2013 21:05:35 #
Bangee5 wrote:
Historians read books, they dig and find artifacts... (show quote)
it has made alot of predictions that has come true. making it harder not to believe.
Nov 8, 2013 00:07:10 #
dirtpusher wrote:
it has made alot of predictions that has come true. making it harder not to believe.
Well it's certainly Hoodwinked a lot of folks. Maybe, Just Maybe, coincidence???
But let's not go there.!!
Nov 8, 2013 00:15:33 #
Bangee5 wrote:
Historians read books, they dig and find artifacts... (show quote)
There you go again, reading peoples minds.
I don't really care much for stories written 2000 odd years back about things that aren't relevant to todays trials & tribulations.
Folks will interpret them as they like. That's no sin but you have no idea what I think or perceive.
Was there a Palestine back in the dark ages or not? Who cares?
Nov 8, 2013 00:56:03 #
Bunko.T wrote:
Well it's certainly Hoodwinked a lot of folks. Maybe, Just Maybe, coincidence???
But let's not go there.!!
But let's not go there.!!
here is a quick easy one;
try looking up six day war. an the prediction.
the real problem are the money makers.
what is your interpretation of Hoodwinked .
Nov 8, 2013 05:56:11 #
Bunko.T wrote:
There you go again, reading peoples minds.
I don't really care much for stories written 2000 odd years back about things that aren't relevant to todays trials & tribulations.
Folks will interpret them as they like. That's no sin but you have no idea what I think or perceive.
Was there a Palestine back in the dark ages or not? Who cares?
I don't really care much for stories written 2000 odd years back about things that aren't relevant to todays trials & tribulations.
Folks will interpret them as they like. That's no sin but you have no idea what I think or perceive.
Was there a Palestine back in the dark ages or not? Who cares?
Then why even ask?
Nov 8, 2013 06:00:03 #
dirtpusher wrote:
here is a quick easy one;
try looking up six day war. an the prediction.
the real problem are the money makers.
what is your interpretation of Hoodwinked .
try looking up six day war. an the prediction.
the real problem are the money makers.
what is your interpretation of Hoodwinked .
It is the predictions yet to come that I am looking for and it might be here sooner then expected when all the Nations turn on Israel - maybe, including the United States. Obama would not help.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.