It is bad enough to hate relentlessly, but to always have to refere to someone else to express that hate is an embarrisment. Surly at one time, based on your education, one would think that you could form your own opinions based on facts gathered from more than radical sources.
dpullum wrote:
It is bad enough to hate relentlessly, but to always have to refere to someone else to express that hate is an embarrisment. Surly at one time, based on your education, one would think that you could form your own opinions based on facts gathered from more than radical sources.
Criticism is not hate. Where was your indignation when Reid declare the Tea Party people are terrorists and anarchists?
ted45 wrote:
Criticism is not hate. Where was your indignation when Reid declare the Tea Party people are terrorists and anarchists?
Honestly, why don't you guys just burn a cross on the White House lawn and be done with it?
Gnslngr wrote:
Honestly, why don't you guys just burn a cross on the White House lawn and be done with it?
Gnslnger I have always respected your point of view even when I disagree with it. Your new comic routine is not funny.
Jackie Mason, a comic, disagrees with the President so he is racist. Bill Maher, a comic, disparages the Republicans, the Tea Party, and anyone that disagrees with the President and he is an intelligent news source.
Why is it OK for the Democrats to refer to the opposition as anarchists, terrorists and Nazis but any criticism of the President is racist? You can answer a simple question.
Wow, quoting Jackie Mason, a known racist,,, is this what UHH has come to?
Of course it is, no surprise here.
ted45 wrote:
Gnslnger I have always respected your point of view even when I disagree with it. Your new comic routine is not funny.
Jackie Mason, a comic, disagrees with the President so he is racist. Bill Maher, a comic, disparages the Republicans, the Tea Party, and anyone that disagrees with the President and he is an intelligent news source.
Why is it OK for the Democrats to refer to the opposition as anarchists, terrorists and Nazis but any criticism of the President is racist? You can answer a simple question.
Gnslnger I have always respected your point of vie... (
show quote)
Correct,Ted, there is no greater purveyor of hate than Maher...but have you ever heard a word about him from pullum???
Jackie Mason is a comic. He attacks on presidents are without mercy regardless of the president. His stick on President Reagan was and is still a classic.
Maher is a social critic just like Mort Sahl was.
Of course Tea Baggers do not understand criticism nor anything that requires thought. Thus the umbridge whenever they are criticized.
Lastly, racism is like pornography, I know it when I see or hear it.
ole sarg wrote:
Jackie Mason is a comic. He attacks on presidents are without mercy regardless of the president. His stick on President Reagan was and is still a classic.
Maher is a social critic just like Mort Sahl was.
Of course Tea Baggers do not understand criticism nor anything that requires thought. Thus the umbridge whenever they are criticized.
Lastly, racism is like pornography, I know it when I see or hear it.
SOCIAL CRITIC!!!....what a load of horseshit as usual from you..
socialist critic is more like it....have you ever heard him say anything critical about Barry Hussein,,,, truly a paid hatemonger..neither funny or truthful..his show should be cancelled..
ole sarg wrote:
Jackie Mason is a comic. He attacks on presidents are without mercy regardless of the president. His stick on President Reagan was and is still a classic.
Maher is a social critic just like Mort Sahl was.
Of course Tea Baggers do not understand criticism nor anything that requires thought. Thus the umbridge whenever they are criticized.
Lastly, racism is like pornography, I know it when I see or hear it.
Neither Mort Saul or Jackie Mason ever resorted to the low gutter references that Bill Maher does. Maher could not clean Mort Saul's shoes.
You apparently are totally ignorant of what the so-called Tea Party actually is why not show a little respect and use the name correctly.
ted45 wrote:
In Part asked: Why is it OK for the Democrats to refer to the opposition as anarchists, ...You can answer a simple question.
Simple answer to simple question: Because they strive to shutdown government, resent any controls imposed environmental, banking, most any control or limitation. They fly the confederate flag, threaten to succeed from the federation. Because the kill abortion doctors because they disagree with them. Because they wish to turn the control of government to big money radicals. Because they suggest using 2nd amendment to cleanse government.... and on and on the many things they state and brag about as tho in a loud bar with their buddies or in a junior high classroom disrupting the class... no goal just anger for the system. I could go on and books are written on the Far-Right agenda.
dpullum wrote:
Simple answer to simple question: Because they strive to shutdown government, resent any controls imposed environmental, banking, most any control or limitation. They fly the confederate flag, threaten to succeed from the federation. Because the kill abortion doctors because they disagree with them. Because they wish to turn the control of government to big money radicals. Because they suggest using 2nd amendment to cleanse government.... and on and on the many things they state and brag about as tho in a loud bar with their buddies or in a junior high classroom disrupting the class... no goal just anger for the system. I could go on and books are written on the Far-Right agenda.
Simple answer to simple question: Because they str... (
show quote)
Excuse me sir, but if you actually go back over the news stories of the past couple of months you will find that the government was shut down by Reid and Obama. In fact the thing the Republicans asked for, a delay in the individual mandate, is now on the Democrat agenda.
As far as the rest of your nonsense, it is unbelievable that a grown adult would even write such drivel.
Republicans kill abortion doctors? You really are a nut case.
Gee ted45, I stand corrected and will leave your Alice in Wonderland world for a more real one. I would not want to drivel, or dribble on your world. Dream on and by all means restrict voting rights to prevent voting cheats that do not exist?!
dpullum wrote:
Simple answer to simple question: Because they strive to shutdown government, resent any controls imposed environmental, banking, most any control or limitation. They fly the confederate flag, threaten to succeed from the federation. Because the kill abortion doctors because they disagree with them. Because they wish to turn the control of government to big money radicals. Because they suggest using 2nd amendment to cleanse government.... and on and on the many things they state and brag about as tho in a loud bar with their buddies or in a junior high classroom disrupting the class... no goal just anger for the system. I could go on and books are written on the Far-Right agenda.
Simple answer to simple question: Because they str... (
show quote)
Wow! I'm glad I'm not down wind of that.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.