Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Maybe we should be painters instead of photographers
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 3, 2013 20:59:13   #
SpeedyWilson Loc: Upstate South Carolina
 
On Nov. 5 a painting will be auctioned by Christie's. It is estimated that it will sell for between $30-$50 million dollars.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/2793073666001/30-million-painting/?intcmp=fbfeatures

So, what do you think? Is that painting worth that amount of money?

What is the highest price ever paid for a photograph? Anybody know?

Reply
Nov 3, 2013 21:03:30   #
TrainNut Loc: Ridin' the rails
 
MisterWilson wrote:
On Nov. 5 a painting will be auctioned by Christie's. It is estimated that it will sell for between $30-$50 million dollars.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/2793073666001/30-million-painting/?intcmp=fbfeatures

So, what do you think? Is that painting worth that amount of money?

What is the highest price ever paid for a photograph? Anybody know?


We are very far behind. :-(
$4,338,500 November 8, 2011
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_photographs :-(

Reply
Nov 3, 2013 21:07:04   #
tusketwedge Loc: Nova Scotia Canada
 
MisterWilson wrote:
On Nov. 5 a painting will be auctioned by Christie's. It is estimated that it will sell for between $30-$50 million dollars.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/2793073666001/30-million-painting/?intcmp=fbfeatures

So, what do you think? Is that painting worth that amount of money?

What is the highest price ever paid for a photograph? Anybody know?


It's like anything it's only worth what people will pay for it. There's a picture taken of the Rhine,so they say,that to me looked like 3 or 4 lines and that just sold at austion for over 3 million plus I seem to remember.Just Google 10 most expensive pictures sold

Reply
 
 
Nov 3, 2013 21:13:19   #
TrainNut Loc: Ridin' the rails
 
MisterWilson wrote:
On Nov. 5 a painting will be auctioned by Christie's. It is estimated that it will sell for between $30-$50 million dollars.

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/2793073666001/30-million-painting/?intcmp=fbfeatures

So, what do you think? Is that painting worth that amount of money?

What is the highest price ever paid for a photograph? Anybody know?


Here is the painting.
Do I hear 30 million?
How about 31 million?
:shock:

Giacometti painting
Giacometti painting...

Reply
Nov 3, 2013 21:24:06   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
The price is always high when it comes to 'art'. Painting more so than photographs as they cannot be reproduced when a photograph can (and I do not mean printing many).

Painting are an investments, a bet that it will not lose value (it helps if the guy is dead) and can be sold later on at a profit.

This is not something one can afford on UHH so (you never know thought) so there is very little else to say.

As to be painter vs photographer? We are world apart despite what some will claim. Artists? Ah! Don't get me started as to what an 'artist' is, I might pee on your shoe!!! :shock: :oops: :mrgreen: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Nov 3, 2013 22:29:14   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
MisterWilson wrote:
So, what do you think? Is that painting worth that amount of money?


It is a very influential artwork. That's the main reason it is so desirable among collectors and why it fetches such a high price.

Shoot an image that will influence future generations of photographers and have a huge impact on the history of photography, and perhaps it too will sell at an auction for an astronomical figure someday.

Reply
Nov 4, 2013 07:30:03   #
pixelmaven Loc: Reno, NV
 
Sure, the price is high because the artist is DEAD! It is a sort of joke between living artists that you have to be deceased in order to command a big price for your work. "Dead, rich artist!" Who benefits, all but the artist. Whether or not you like the piece, it remains the same. Think of Van Gogh. Did he garner any sales of his art when he was alive? I am a 'living artist' responding here. No one buys this stuff for the art but as an "investment" and on speculation. It's quite a conundrum when you consider the entire art scene.

Reply
 
 
Nov 4, 2013 07:37:05   #
Bartulius Loc: Bristol, Ct
 
We may never know the price of the most expensive photograph if it was used in a blackmail scheme. Just thinking...

Reply
Nov 4, 2013 09:29:52   #
donrosshill Loc: Delaware & Florida
 
First, I am a Conservative. There is no way in Hell that this so called painting or any other is WORTH that amount of money.
However, if someone has that amount of money to invest then go for it. I do question their mentality.
I do like it as a preliminary sketch to what will be a final painting.

Reply
Nov 4, 2013 10:05:17   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
pixelmaven wrote:
Sure, the price is high because the artist is DEAD! It is a sort of joke between living artists that you have to be deceased in order to command a big price for your work. "Dead, rich artist!" Who benefits, all but the artist. Whether or not you like the piece, it remains the same. Think of Van Gogh. Did he garner any sales of his art when he was alive? I am a 'living artist' responding here. No one buys this stuff for the art but as an "investment" and on speculation. It's quite a conundrum when you consider the entire art scene.
Sure, the price is high because the artist is DEAD... (show quote)


This is somewhat inaccurate. There have been plenty of artists who fetched high prices for their work while still alive and active. Perhaps not for sums in the millions, but enough to allow the artist to live in wealth and comfort, and to be selective concerning patronage. Poussin. Michelangelo. Rubens. Dali. And many, many more. Painters who gained recognition after death but not during lifetime are the exception, not the rule.

Reply
Nov 4, 2013 10:14:04   #
warrior Loc: Paso Robles CA
 
TrainNut wrote:
We are very far behind. :-(
$4,338,500 November 8, 2011
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_photographs :-(


I just enjoy turning my photos into paintings using Topaz simplify!!!! :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Nov 4, 2013 10:40:38   #
Jim_In_Plymouth Loc: Plymouth MN
 
rook2c4 wrote:
It is a very influential artwork. That's the main reason it is so desirable among collectors and why it fetches such a high price.

Shoot an image that will influence future generations of photographers and have a huge impact on the history of photography, and perhaps it too will sell at an auction for an astronomical figure someday.



Well stated.

Reply
Nov 4, 2013 10:43:18   #
RMM Loc: Suburban New York
 
Someone, please tell me that somebody misplaced their decimal point. Maybe lost it altogether.

Reply
Nov 4, 2013 11:21:26   #
TrainNut Loc: Ridin' the rails
 
Bartulius wrote:
We may never know the price of the most expensive photograph if it was used in a blackmail scheme. Just thinking...


:thumbup:

Reply
Nov 4, 2013 11:23:49   #
TrainNut Loc: Ridin' the rails
 
warrior wrote:
I just enjoy turning my photos into paintings using Topaz simplify!!!! :thumbup:


A lot easier.
Put them on canvas instead of photo paper and you might have a winner. ;) :thumbup:

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.