As for me I'd say it would be my 600mm f5.6 Sport Kilar made by Kilfitt (see [
http://www.kilfitt.org/Lenses/TeleKilar600.htm]). In 2nd place I would say it would be my Kodak Medalist camera. A wonderful camera with a sharp Ektar lens that produced a 2 1/4 X 3 1/4 negative on 620 roll film.
I had a 'light meter', made by Voigtlander if I recall correctly, which was bizarre in the extreme. It was like a small square telescope, about 3" long. You looked through an eyepiece and saw the scene with the left half of the image coming through a neutral density filter and the right half through another filter which faded gradually from clear to completely opaque. You turned a knob which rotated the graduated filter until both halves of the image were the same brightness then read off a scale what the aperture setting would be for a particular shutter speed and ASA.
Daft as it sounds it actually worked pretty well provided there was plenty of light. I used it for quite some time even after I bought my first 35mm film camera with TTL ( a trusty old Zenith).
In the 60's my friend had a 35mm camera and long lens mounted on a wood rifle stock. It was like shooting a gun. Not a very good idea these days...
plieber wrote:
As for me I'd say it would be my 600mm f5.6 Sport Kilar made by Kilfitt (see [
http://www.kilfitt.org/Lenses/TeleKilar600.htm]). In 2nd place I would say it would be my Kodak Medalist camera. A wonderful camera with a sharp Ektar lens that produced a 2 1/4 X 3 1/4 negative on 620 roll film.
A 35mm Macro Kilar, also made by Kilfitt. An incredibly sharp lens. I used it mounted on an Alpa 11d camera, also just as wonderful.
kintekobo wrote:
I had a 'light meter', made by Voigtlander if I recall correctly, which was bizarre in the extreme. It was like a small square telescope, about 3" long. You looked through an eyepiece and saw the scene with the left half of the image coming through a neutral density filter and the right half through another filter which faded gradually from clear to completely opaque. You turned a knob which rotated the graduated filter until both halves of the image were the same brightness then read off a scale what the aperture setting would be for a particular shutter speed and ASA.
Daft as it sounds it actually worked pretty well provided there was plenty of light. I used it for quite some time even after I bought my first 35mm film camera with TTL ( a trusty old Zenith).
I had a 'light meter', made by Voigtlander if I re... (
show quote)
Wow, I saw and heard about a lot of strange equipment working at the family's photo store, but I never encountered anything like you describe. If you still have it, it would be worth something.
Julian wrote:
plieber wrote:
As for me I'd say it would be my 600mm f5.6 Sport Kilar made by Kilfitt (see [
http://www.kilfitt.org/Lenses/TeleKilar600.htm]). In 2nd place I would say it would be my Kodak Medalist camera. A wonderful camera with a sharp Ektar lens that produced a 2 1/4 X 3 1/4 negative on 620 roll film.
A 35mm Macro Kilar, also made by Kilfitt. An incredibly sharp lens. I used it mounted on an Alpa 11d camera, also just as wonderful.
As a kid I lusted after Alpa reflex cameras. Even today an Alpa camera commands a high price tag as a collector's item.
plieber wrote:
As a kid I lusted after Alpa reflex cameras. Even today an Alpa camera commands a high price tag as a collector's item.
Have you seen the new ones? Not reflexes, and not 35mm, but beautiful:
http://www.alpa.ch/en/intro.htmlCheers,
R.
Minox 16mm "spy" camera.
Canon 1/2 frame camera (used 35mm film); had a flash gun included that held five AG-1 flash bulbs.
Kodak Retina 35mm camera.
bob swift wrote:
Minox 16mm "spy" camera.
Canon 1/2 frame camera (used 35mm film); had a flash gun included that held five AG-1 flash bulbs.
Kodak Retina 35mm camera.
Dear Bob,
Are you sure it was 16mm and not 9.5mm?
Cheers,
R.
Plieber wrote
Quote:
Wow, I saw and heard about a lot of strange equipment working at the family's photo store, but I never encountered anything like you describe. If you still have it, it would be worth something.
No, I'm afraid it hit the junk pile a long time ago. Curiosity got the better of me one day (that's how I found out what was inside!) and I never managed to get it back together again so that it worked correctly. Shame really because it was beautifully made.
Roger refers to the "Leica RIFLE" I found an image and auction listing.
http://www.petapixel.com/tag/gun/This may have been what my HS friend had. His father was very wealthy. Selling now for $100,000. Yikes!
My wife bought me a small plastic camera for fishing trips it was called Le Mini it came in a waterproof plastic case. You opened the back and inserted 110 film and wound it up.
Roger Hicks wrote:
plieber wrote:
As a kid I lusted after Alpa reflex cameras. Even today an Alpa camera commands a high price tag as a collector's item.
Have you seen the new ones? Not reflexes, and not 35mm, but beautiful:
http://www.alpa.ch/en/intro.htmlCheers,
R.
Oh, Wow; now I lust after the new Alpa's! Thanks for the website.
WOW! What nice cameras! I gotta stay away...
plieber wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
plieber wrote:
As a kid I lusted after Alpa reflex cameras. Even today an Alpa camera commands a high price tag as a collector's item.
Have you seen the new ones? Not reflexes, and not 35mm, but beautiful:
http://www.alpa.ch/en/intro.htmlCheers,
R.
Oh, Wow; now I lust after the new Alpa's! Thanks for the website.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.