Sebelius: I'm Not Signing Up for Obamacare
Oct 23, 2013 21:35:23 #
GregC
Loc: Alabaster, Al
Surprise surprise....... NOT!!!!
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/23/politics/obamacare-sebelius-interview/
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/23/politics/obamacare-sebelius-interview/
Oct 23, 2013 21:52:53 #
GregC wrote:
Surprise surprise....... NOT!!!!
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/23/politics/obamacare-sebelius-interview/
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/23/politics/obamacare-sebelius-interview/
Think your title for your post is a bit misleading. Perhaps you are saying hat YOU won't be signing up but the title implies just the opposit.
Oct 23, 2013 22:09:43 #
Oct 23, 2013 22:20:47 #
magicray wrote:
I'm not signing up.
Yup. I'm with Bilious..... :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Oct 23, 2013 22:25:29 #
GregC
Loc: Alabaster, Al
UP-2-IT wrote:
Think your title for your post is a bit misleading. Perhaps you are saying hat YOU won't be signing up but the title implies just the opposit.
Not sure how that can be misleading when its what Kathleen Sebelius said. That is what the subject says, maybe you missed her last name in the subject?
Oct 23, 2013 22:36:35 #
GregC wrote:
Not sure how that can be misleading when its what Kathleen Sebelius said. That is what the subject says, maybe you missed her last name in the subject?
Read the entire article, never saw that statement.
Oct 23, 2013 22:42:26 #
GregC wrote:
Surprise surprise....... NOT!!!!
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/23/politics/obamacare-sebelius-interview/
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/23/politics/obamacare-sebelius-interview/
Sorry, but are you really that stupid? She doesn't qualify for insurance under the PPACA, since she already has insurance from her employer.
Neither does anyone else who already had insurance from his or her employer. Can all of you conservatives get that through your thick skulls? I am SO tired of all of the pointless rants about how Congress exempted itself form the PPACA, WHICH IT DID NOT. All government employees at the federal, state and local levels already have insurance through their jobs, so THEY DONT NEED TO SIGN UP!!!!
Why not be concerned about some real problems, like immigration or job creation, instead of blindly focusing on issues that just don't exist?
Oct 23, 2013 22:44:48 #
UP-2-IT wrote:
Read the entire article, never saw that statement.
It wasn't in the article, she mentioned in the interview that she already had insurance, so she didn't need to sign up. But the OP obviously has no clue about what the PPACA IS, and so we get this stupid, pointless interview in an attempt to make a non-existent point.
Oct 24, 2013 08:52:50 #
tschmath wrote:
Sorry, but are you really that stupid? She doesn'... (show quote)
You are not entirely correct. The members of Congress and their staff members must purchase the ACA through one of the exchanges by the end of the year. What was passed is a 75% subsidy for the members and their employees.
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/the-exchange/congressional-exemption-obamacare-another-myth-153149342.html
Oct 24, 2013 09:00:37 #
tschmath wrote:
Sorry, but are you really that stupid? She doesn'... (show quote)
OK, how are you going to fix immigration and job creation?
Oct 24, 2013 10:10:41 #
tschmath wrote:
It wasn't in the article, she mentioned in the interview that she already had insurance, so she didn't need to sign up. But the OP obviously has no clue about what the PPACA IS, and so we get this stupid, pointless interview in an attempt to make a non-existent point.
Umm....just like the stupid, pointless department Sillybus runs, and the stupid, pointless healthcare law she supports. "Madness" is the lib mantra. Totally expected.
Oct 24, 2013 10:48:18 #
tschmath wrote:
It wasn't in the article, she mentioned in the interview that she already had insurance, so she didn't need to sign up. But the OP obviously has no clue about what the PPACA IS, and so we get this stupid, pointless interview in an attempt to make a non-existent point.
Right, proved my point in my reponse to GregC's post.
Oct 24, 2013 11:43:14 #
magicray wrote:
I'm not signing up.
I'm not signing up.
Lmarc wrote:
Yah, but she doesn't have to and neither do I. Ha! The Tea Party Republicans should be charged with attempted anarchy. :shock:Yup. I'm with Bilious..... :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Oct 24, 2013 11:43:50 #
Oct 24, 2013 12:33:50 #
The amount of misinformation on this site just boggles my mind. I swear some of you have no clue what the Affordable Care Act is. It's for those that don't have insurance. If you already have insurance or on an entitlement such as medicare or medicaid you don't have to sign up for anything.
Look, Obmacare has its problems and those problems need to be fixed but in the end it isn't a website and it isn't about taking a bunch of old coots who are on medicare and changing their insurance. It's about getting those who are uninsured coverage so they can have a better quality of life and so they won't owe hundreds of thousands of dollars if they have a catastrophic illness or accident.
Someone please tell me how a major platform of the Republican Party can be denying healthcare insurance to people.
Look, Obmacare has its problems and those problems need to be fixed but in the end it isn't a website and it isn't about taking a bunch of old coots who are on medicare and changing their insurance. It's about getting those who are uninsured coverage so they can have a better quality of life and so they won't owe hundreds of thousands of dollars if they have a catastrophic illness or accident.
Someone please tell me how a major platform of the Republican Party can be denying healthcare insurance to people.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.