Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Was this prophetic or what?
Oct 9, 2013 13:18:08   #
LinksUp
 
The web site hosting this video clip is not relevant, but the first 30 seconds are.

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/2013/10/09/exclusive-mitt-romney-how-he-would-reopen-government

So, if he was right about Obama on these issues, how many other issues was he also right about? Only time will tell.

Reply
Oct 10, 2013 12:50:51   #
JaiGieEse Loc: Foxworth, MS
 
LinksUp wrote:
The web site hosting this video clip is not relevant, but the first 30 seconds are.

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/2013/10/09/exclusive-mitt-romney-how-he-would-reopen-government

So, if he was right about Obama on these issues, how many other issues was he also right about? Only time will tell.


Why would you claim that Fox News is not a relevant website? Fox News regularly out-rates CNN and MSNBC combined, and numerous polls show Fox as the most-trusted news gathering organization in the country. Their programming in generally rated No. 1 across the board, day and night. And if you feel the site is irrelevant, why, pray tell, do you visit it?

Reply
Oct 10, 2013 13:16:16   #
LinksUp
 
JaiGieEse wrote:
Why would you claim that Fox News is not a relevant website? Fox News regularly out-rates CNN and MSNBC combined, and numerous polls show Fox as the most-trusted news gathering organization in the country. Their programming in generally rated No. 1 across the board, day and night. And if you feel the site is irrelevant, why, pray tell, do you visit it?

You people read so far in between the lines looking for monsters, that is exactly want you find.

Where did I say the Fox News is not a relevant website? Read it again. I said who was hosting the story was not relevant. That means they were just a conveyor of information, not the creators.

There are so many people on this forum who judge the worthiness of any news story based solely on where it came from, not its content. And, in this case, who is hosting the story is irrelevant.

Take a chill pill, quit hijacking this thread with nonsense, and add a comment concerning what this post is really about.

Reply
 
 
Oct 10, 2013 13:37:15   #
JaiGieEse Loc: Foxworth, MS
 
LinksUp wrote:
You people read so far in between the lines looking for monsters, that is exactly want you find.

Where did I say the Fox News is not a relevant website? Read it again. I said who was hosting the story was not relevant. That means they were just a conveyor of information, not the creators.

There are so many people on this forum who judge the worthiness of any news story based solely on where it came from, not its content. And, in this case, who is hosting the story is irrelevant.

Take a chill pill, quit hijacking this thread with nonsense, and add a comment concerning what this post is really about.
You people read so far in between the lines lookin... (show quote)


I responded to your claim. Not hijacking. Seemed to me that you were attacking Fox news, so i responded to that perception. Perhaps I misunderstood. Perhaps I wouldn't have if you'd named the allegedly irrelevant website. Take your own chill pill, pal.

Now then, Yes, Romney was and is correct in this particular situation, and many others. Pity more people didn't realize that when it could have done some good.

Now, does that soothe your jangled nerves?

Reply
Oct 10, 2013 14:55:58   #
UP-2-IT Loc: RED STICK, LA
 
JaiGieEse wrote:
I responded to your claim. Not hijacking. Seemed to me that you were attacking Fox news, so i responded to that perception. Perhaps I misunderstood. Perhaps I wouldn't have if you'd named the allegedly irrelevant website. Take your own chill pill, pal.

Now then, Yes, Romney was and is correct in this particular situation, and many others. Pity more people didn't realize that when it could have done some good.

Now, does that soothe your jangled nerves?


Look at the link and you can tell the web site, course if you can't figure that out that helps explain your infatuation with FAUX news. The most despised news on TV.

Reply
Oct 10, 2013 14:59:21   #
JaiGieEse Loc: Foxworth, MS
 
UP-2-IT wrote:
Look at the link and you can tell the web site, course if you can't figure that out that helps explain your infatuation with FAUX news. The most despised news on TV.


That would be the most trusted name in news, pal. Facts is facts.

Reply
Oct 10, 2013 15:16:55   #
UP-2-IT Loc: RED STICK, LA
 
JaiGieEse wrote:
That would be the most trusted name in news, pal. Facts is facts.


Sorry, didn't realize your in Mississippi, that explains your thoughts.

Reply
 
 
Oct 10, 2013 17:23:53   #
JaiGieEse Loc: Foxworth, MS
 
UP-2-IT wrote:
Sorry, didn't realize your in Mississippi, that explains your thoughts.


Yeah, right. You probably suppoprt LSU and that would explain yours.....

Reply
Oct 10, 2013 18:00:23   #
UP-2-IT Loc: RED STICK, LA
 
JaiGieEse wrote:
Yeah, right. You probably suppoprt LSU and that would explain yours.....


Oh yeah, most assuredly do. What happened last Saturday 59-24 thought ya'll wanted to play football. tsk tsk

Reply
Oct 10, 2013 21:34:58   #
bcheary Loc: Jacksonville, FL
 
LinksUp wrote:
The web site hosting this video clip is not relevant, but the first 30 seconds are.

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/2013/10/09/exclusive-mitt-romney-how-he-would-reopen-government

So, if he was right about Obama on these issues, how many other issues was he also right about? Only time will tell.


Too bad he didn't win the election. He would have been a helluva lot better than Obummer.

Reply
Oct 10, 2013 22:32:06   #
venturer9 Loc: Newton, Il.
 
JaiGieEse wrote:
I responded to your claim. Not hijacking. Seemed to me that you were attacking Fox news, so i responded to that perception. Perhaps I misunderstood. Perhaps I wouldn't have if you'd named the allegedly irrelevant website. Take your own chill pill, pal.

Now then, Yes, Romney was and is correct in this particular situation, and many others. Pity more people didn't realize that when it could have done some good.

Now, does that soothe your jangled nerves?


**************************************************

How would it soothe his nerves when you came back and said the exact same thing you said before... Even after he explained exactly what he meant. Somehow this ignorant conservative knew exactly what he meant when he said that.....

Mike

Reply
 
 
Oct 10, 2013 22:37:16   #
venturer9 Loc: Newton, Il.
 
UP-2-IT wrote:
Look at the link and you can tell the web site, course if you can't figure that out that helps explain your infatuation with FAUX news. The most despised news on TV.


****************************************************

My Lord Up-2-IT.... only in your liberal mind is it the most despised news on TV......It doesn't matter how many "Right Wing Nuts" like my self watch Fox news (as well as CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, etc) there is no way that the favorable numbers of the Channel would exist with out you FAUX intelligent people watching and unless you are throwing darts at the tv... enjoying what you see

Mike.

Reply
Oct 10, 2013 22:37:36   #
Zophman Loc: Northwest
 
Oh brother! Does it matter what news media reported this? The words stated by Mitt are what matters. We screwed up last November that's for sure!

Reply
Oct 10, 2013 23:36:00   #
UP-2-IT Loc: RED STICK, LA
 
venturer9 wrote:
****************************************************

My Lord Up-2-IT.... only in your liberal mind is it the most despised news on TV......It doesn't matter how many "Right Wing Nuts" like my self watch Fox news (as well as CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, etc) there is no way that the favorable numbers of the Channel would exist with out you FAUX intelligent people watching and unless you are throwing darts at the tv... enjoying what you see

Mike.


No Mike I'm not a follower of Fox at all.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.