Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Close Up Photography
Shroom View
Oct 6, 2013 14:13:45   #
A-PeeR Loc: Houston, Texas
 
Overcast and wet lately so the mushrooms have been popping up here and there. This outcrop was in the shade of tall pines.

Would have preferred to get lower to the ground and have a more upward angle but the terrain and my gear wouldn't cooperate.

90mm three frame horizontal stitch, with half a frame cropped.

Shrooms - f20 - .8sec - ISO 100
Shrooms - f20 - .8sec - ISO 100...

Reply
Oct 23, 2013 13:14:41   #
naturepics43 Loc: Hocking Co. Ohio - USA
 
I'm glad you posted this link. Great image! I would never have thought about doing something like this. Thanks for posting. Sorry I missed it earlier.

Reply
Oct 23, 2013 21:33:43   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
A-PeeR wrote:
Overcast and wet lately so the mushrooms have been popping up here and there. This outcrop was in the shade of tall pines.

Would have preferred to get lower to the ground and have a more upward angle but the terrain and my gear wouldn't cooperate.

90mm three frame horizontal stitch, with half a frame cropped.


William: Question: Did you use a Panoramic Nodal Head, or did you take the three photos moving parallel to the mushroom? i.e. movement along the x-axis using a focusing rail?

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2013 22:11:53   #
A-PeeR Loc: Houston, Texas
 
Thank you naturepics and no worries on missing it. I'm glad to read I may have given you a concept to work with. I would be most interest in seeing what you produce.

naturepics43 wrote:
I'm glad you posted this link. Great image! I would never have thought about doing something like this. Thanks for posting. Sorry I missed it earlier.

Reply
Oct 23, 2013 22:23:15   #
A-PeeR Loc: Houston, Texas
 
Allen - I moved the lens parallel to the mushrooms using a tilt shift lens. Three total frames, one to the extreme left, one in the middle, and one to the extreme right. You don't need a tilt shift lens to do this, just use a focusing rail to move the camera along the x-axis.

LoneRangeFinder wrote:
William: Question: Did you use a Panoramic Nodal Head, or did you take the three photos moving parallel to the mushroom? i.e. movement along the x-axis using a focusing rail?

Reply
Oct 23, 2013 23:10:39   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
A-PeeR wrote:
Allen - I moved the lens parallel to the mushrooms using a tilt shift lens. Three total frames, one to the extreme left, one in the middle, and one to the extreme right. You don't need a tilt shift lens to do this, just use a focusing rail to move the camera along the x-axis.


That was my thinking-- but I'm not sure I have enough travel. Although I guess with true macro, I might. I was actually thinking of doing a horizontal view and shooting a three shot pano.

Reply
Oct 24, 2013 20:19:36   #
Thunder_o_b Loc: NE Ohio USA
 
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
That was my thinking-- but I'm not sure I have enough travel. Although I guess with true macro, I might. I was actually thinking of doing a horizontal view and shooting a three shot pano.


Got a nice one here.

Reply
 
 
Oct 24, 2013 23:13:51   #
A-PeeR Loc: Houston, Texas
 
Best I can figure, if you want a three frame horizontal axis-pan with 30% overlap you will need 56.6 mm of travel L16.5 - M23.6 - R16.5. I really look forward to seeing what you come up with. I think "macroscape" has the potential to produce unique and rewarding shots.

LoneRangeFinder wrote:
That was my thinking-- but I'm not sure I have enough travel. Although I guess with true macro, I might. I was actually thinking of doing a horizontal view and shooting a three shot pano.

Reply
Oct 25, 2013 22:56:25   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
A-PeeR wrote:
Best I can figure, if you want a three frame horizontal axis-pan with 30% overlap you will need 56.6 mm of travel L16.5 - M23.6 - R16.5. I really look forward to seeing what you come up with. I think "macroscape" has the potential to produce unique and rewarding shots.


Is there an "ideal overlap"? Is there a point of too much overlap? I guess I'll find out....

Reply
Oct 26, 2013 06:24:21   #
A-PeeR Loc: Houston, Texas
 
It's going to depend on your lens' IQ at the edge of the frame. If you are using the 105, I suspect minimal overlap would be in the area of 10-to-15 percent. If you go that route, to be safe, I would do one in the 25 perecent range as well.

LoneRangeFinder wrote:
Is there an "ideal overlap"? Is there a point of too much overlap? I guess I'll find out....

Reply
Oct 26, 2013 10:13:37   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
A-PeeR wrote:
It's going to depend on your lens' IQ at the edge of the frame. If you are using the 105, I suspect minimal overlap would be in the area of 10-to-15 percent. If you go that route, to be safe, I would do one in the 25 perecent range as well.


I'll be using my 105. Reason I asked is that I read somewhere that too much overlap may not be ideal.

Reply
 
 
Oct 26, 2013 15:57:58   #
A-PeeR Loc: Houston, Texas
 
Interesting, I have read that good overlap for Pano's is somewhere between 20 and 40%. I never really thought about overlapping too much. Perhaps something to do with pivoting. I'd have to think about it a while and do some research.

Won't matter, you are moving along an axis parallel to the subject and not pivoting around in an arc. Your biggest restriction (for stitching) is going to be the edge of your glass. Since it's a Macro lens that produces a flat image with little distortion at the edges I think 15% overlap will suffice but I'd do one at 25% as well.

Reply
Oct 26, 2013 17:07:39   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
A-PeeR wrote:
Interesting, I have read that good overlap for Pano's is somewhere between 20 and 40%. I never really thought about overlapping too much. Perhaps something to do with pivoting. I'd have to think about it a while and do some research.

Won't matter, you are moving along an axis parallel to the subject and not pivoting around in an arc. Your biggest restriction (for stitching) is going to be the edge of your glass. Since it's a Macro lens that produces a flat image with little distortion at the edges I think 15% overlap will suffice but I'd do one at 25% as well.
Interesting, I have read that good overlap for Pan... (show quote)


My DIY project is not going well...I'm having to re-think how I'll do this

Reply
Oct 27, 2013 13:37:36   #
A-PeeR Loc: Houston, Texas
 
If you need to bounce the proverbial idea ball off the wall let me know.

LoneRangeFinder wrote:
My DIY project is not going well...I'm having to re-think how I'll do this

Reply
Oct 27, 2013 15:20:13   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
A-PeeR wrote:
If you need to bounce the proverbial idea ball off the wall let me know.


Hey William: I did a short test and posted them under "Panos for A-Pee-R"

Thanks.

Allen

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Close Up Photography
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.