Earlier this year I bought a used Canon TV Lens, 15-150mm f2.8 from the local Co-Op. I had read the TV lens were exceptionally sharp and contained high grade glass, fluorite in most cases. So I took a chance, shelled out $30 with the intention of reverse mounting it. Spring came and it was off to the fields, the TV lens project on hold.
Lately Ive been ramping up for the fall/winter field macro slow down by working on my stacking rig. I ordered step-down rings for the lens, built a plexiglass support and removed the focus motor (shot). We had heavy rains on Friday and Saturday so there was plenty of time to hook everything up and do some initial tests. Results are encouraging and I think I am going to be able to squeeze 8:1 with a working distance of ~ 23mm out of the setup. As time permits Ill start doing some simple stacks and posting results. Below is a picture of the rig and uncropped shots of the magnification using a metric (mm) scale. Magnifications range from 4.5:1 to 18:1.
The Rig Setup for Horizontal Shooting. NRC Stand and AeroTech Linear Slide on Left for vertical stacking (with shorter setups) and Brinkmann micro manipulator in the center for positioning subject on x,y,z, and forward pitch.
150mm f5.6 - 8mm across frame ~ 4.5:1 Working Distance 56mm Vingetting and distortion on the edge. CA on the lettering in the center. Good example of how zooms are compromised when fully extended, albeit Im pushing it.
100mm f5.6 - 7mm across frame ~5:1 Working Distance 34.5mm Vingetting and distortion clean up. A poor mans MP-E?
50mm f4.0 6mm across frame ~ 6:1 Working Distance 26.5mm Looking good.
25mm f2.8 4mm across frame ~ 9:1 Working Distance 21.5mm loss of contrast and slight distortion in the center, lens shows its weakness wide open or diffraction, probably the latter.
15mm f2.8 3mm across frame ~ 12:1 Working Distance 19mm, loss of contrast and strong distortion in the center
15mm f2.8 w full bellows draw 2mm across frame 18:1 Working Distance 18mm loss of contrast and strong distortion throughout the frame.
I agree with your assessment.
Considerable time and effort on your part, but very informative - thank you for sharing.
You must certainly be dedicated to your photography.
Singing Swan wrote:
You must certainly be dedicated to your photography.
I think the correct word is committed. As in, I should be.... ;-)
A-PeeR wrote:
I think the correct word is committed. As in, I should be.... ;-)
Nah....dedicated. It must have taken a lot of time and effort to do this set-up. I thought I was dedicated because I try to do SOME sort of photography every day. This goes way beyond, but I don't think you need to be committed just yet...maybe just watched closely!! :)
Oh, and thanks for the examples. It made an impression on my brain to see the differences with my own eyes.
dedicated,committed,either way its way more than i will ever try.i cant wait to see some bug shots.show me a springtail when it gets cool.i shoot them a lot but the globular springtails i like to shoot are so tiny
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.