dpullum wrote:
If you are conserned regarding the "where" you are going, then the best insurance is a good quality point and shoot.Indeed it is helpful to be shooting with a group.
Shooting alone a Canon with extra lenses hanging around your neck may cost you your neck. Some countries charge 100% import so the cost of a camera in a store may be very high indeed. Your display of wealth is a red flag. Blend and look poor. While living in Argentina for a year, no one looked twice at my Panasonic TZ-3, I was very careful about using better equipment.
If you are conserned regarding the "where&quo... (
show quote)
You can get over-excited about this. I've travelled extensively in poor countries -- particularly India and China -- with VERY expensive cameras (Alpa, Linhof, Leica...) and never in a group (the best way I can imagine to get bad shots). Yes, I had a camera bag stolen in India in 1982, but that was carelessness on my part.
If a camera is likely to 'cost me my neck' I don't think I'd bother to go. A lot of it is to do with attitude. If you look and act fearful, it can be a self-fulfilling prophecy, and with common sense: there are plenty of places in 'safe' countries (mostly cities, late at night) where I'd worry more about being robbed than in (for example) India or China.
Just off the top of my head, I've used Leicas in Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, China, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Holland, India, Italy, Kosova, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxemburg, Malta, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, U.K., U.S.A. and I've never been robbed or threatened with violence. All of the time, I have been travelling with just my wife, who's five foot tall, by air, bus, train, Land Rover, motorcycle...
Cheers,
R.