24 nations back U.S. on Syria: http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2013/09/09/obama-syria-24-countries-statement/2787217/...

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2013/09/09/obama-syria-24-countries-statement/2787217/

Samuraiz Loc: Central Florida

Ok so 12% of the UN listed countries support Obama......

Samuraiz Loc: Central Florida

Double Tap

Erv Loc: Medina Ohio

I just wonder if they are going to send their loved ones in to help? I would back him too. if we did have to send our kids in or our Mothers and Dads.
Erv

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

Erv wrote:

I just wonder if they are going to send their loved ones in to help? I would back him too. if we did have to send our kids in or our Mothers and Dads.
Erv

guess they gonna try work something out about removing those gasses. if they can figure out how with all the fightin. gonna be interesting.

Bruce with a Canon Loc: Islip

what have we learned since the last time we interfered with a middle eastern nation that used WMD on their own citizens ( Remember Iraq gassing Kurds ) apparently no WMD were found ( other than by the Kurds )

For my part I suggest the UN deal with it.
Arab league can deal with the carnage.
Bring our troops home from Iraq, Afghanistan, for that matter Germany and Turkey. I can see why we are in Korea, why do we stay in Japan?

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

charlie rose interviewing assad on pbs right now. guess most his chemical wepons came from us.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

dirtpusher wrote:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2013/09/09/obama-syria-24-countries-statement/2787217/

Cono I am trying to not come right out and say it... But let me see if I can do this rationally.

THERE IS A BIG F'ING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONDEMNING THE USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN SYRIA AND SUPPORTING A US ATTACK ON SYRIA!

Many of those same nations have called on the US to not attack Syria, the Obama administration as usual are lying their kisters off.

Samuraiz Loc: Central Florida

Blurryeyed wrote:

Cono I am trying to not come right out and say it... But let me see if I can do this rationally.

THERE IS A BIG F'ING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONDEMNING THE USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN SYRIA AND SUPPORTING A US ATTACK ON SYRIA!

Many of those same nations have called on the US to not attack Syria, the Obama administration as usual are lying their kisters off.

:thumbup:

farnsworth52 Loc: W. Pa.

Does support mean they will share the costs involved--Think not

Wellhiem Loc: Sunny England.

"We condemn in the strongest terms the horrific chemical weapons attack in the suburbs of Damascus on August 21st that claimed the lives of so many men, women and children," the statement says. "The evidence clearly points to the Syrian government being responsible for the attack, which is part of a pattern of chemical weapons use by the regime."

Nothing about taking action.

I know Blurryeyed has already made this point. Just thought I'd reinforce it.

Wellhiem Loc: Sunny England.

farnsworth52 wrote:

Does support mean they will share the costs involved--Think not

You sold them the gas. Use the money you made from that little deal.

ottopj Loc: Annapolis, MD USA

Here's another thought from a couple of days ago.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/is-this-what-syria-war-really-about/

dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma

Blurryeyed wrote:

Cono I am trying to not come right out and say it... But let me see if I can do this rationally.

THERE IS A BIG F'ING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONDEMNING THE USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN SYRIA AND SUPPORTING A US ATTACK ON SYRIA!

Many of those same nations have called on the US to not attack Syria, the Obama administration as usual are lying their kisters off.

let me say this first i am not an obama supporter....!!!
but will listen to facts.
israel more less asked us too.
1925 world did say no chemical wepons. whole world stepped on it. syria did not sign it. too bad.
so does all this 1925 paper worth anything?
did these countries back what they signed.

we ever been lied to before?
did bush lie? we know about that!!!
did johnson lie about the attak on the USS Maddox in gulf of tonkin?
was USS Maddox really fired upon? or was it flying fish hitting haul of ship, was fish really reason reason for 50.000 lives lost.
did did johnson ask Robert McNamara not to say anthing?

Lyndon Johnson - Report on the Gulf of Tonkin Incident
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx8-ffiYyzA

Gulf of Tonkin: McNamara admits It didn't happen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HODxnUrFX6k

HEART Loc: God's Country - COLORADO

dirtpusher wrote:

let me say this first i am not an obama supporter.... (show quote)

"In the beginning was the Word...", then Obama spoke, and no one's been able to get a word in edgewise ever since.