I recently purchased a Raynox DCR-150 'add-on' diopter lens to use with my Nikkor 105G macro lens.
The combination gives me a magnification range of 0.45:1 (0.45x life-size) to 1.9:1 (1.9x life-size).
Here are images from my first field outing with this combo.
Raynox M-150 'add-on' lens
Gray Hairstreak butterfly
Gray Damselfly
Gray Dasmselfly, tighter grop
Mid-instar nymph Southern Green Shieldbug (Nezara viridula)
Mid-instar nymphs Southern Green Shieldbug (Nezara viridula)
Mid-instar nymph Southern Green Shieldbug (Nezara viridula)
Gulf Fritillary butterfly
Just beautiful. Thanks for sharing. Adding the Raynox to wish list. :wink:
Nice first go around. Fritillary shot is excellent. Aspect ratios look right, guessing the tighter cropped Damsel was at 1:1.9. Frame fill looks about the same as when I shot on the T2i. You can see how DoF gets very thin. I'm not real experienced at identifying CA, but I think there are subtle bits of it, particularly on the shoulder areas of the damsel thorax. Also notice it ever so slightly on the shield bug shell. What do you think Douglass?
Curious do you swap out diopters to change magnification or is the diopter to lens distance increased.
A-PeeR wrote:
Curious do you swap out diopters to change magnification or is the diopter to lens distance increased.
I have the Raynox 250 like Martin uses-- but I'll leave the technical response to Douglass.
Love the detail shot of the Gulf Butterfly-- and then the shield bugs. Haven't seen this variety. Is this at Fullerton Botanical?
A-PeeR wrote:
I'm not real experienced at identifying CA, but I think there are subtle bits of it, particularly on the shoulder areas of the damsel thorax. Also notice it ever so slightly on the shield bug shell. What do you think Douglass?
Curious do you swap out diopters to change magnification or is the diopter to lens distance increased.
Upon extreme magnification, I do see some Chromatic Aberration in the reflected specular highlights on the damselfly shoulder & leg. Not noticeable otherwise. I do not see it on the Shield bug carapace.
I own only the Raynox M-150 (+4.8 diopters), so cannot do any 'swapping', nor would I want to. The Raynox M-250 (+8 diopters) is better for the
really tiny subjects, but too close for small insects, so I am personally happy with the M-150.
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
Is this at Fullerton Botanical?
South Coast Botanic Garden, Palos Verdes Peninsula.
most look like you can shoot that close with just your macro lens?
tinusbum wrote:
most look like you can shoot that close with just your macro lens?
Possibly, but now my focusing range is approx 1:2 to nearly 2:1, instead of 'infinity' to 1:1. I find this much easier.
Nikonian72 wrote:
Possibly, but now my focusing range is approx 1:2 to nearly 2:1, instead of 'infinity' to 1:1. I find this much easier.
do you find the raynox better than tubes?
tinusbum wrote:
do you find the raynox better than tubes?
Have not yet done a side-by-side comparison, but I have one planned. I
do like the instant dis-connect of the spring-loaded Raynox clip.
Beautiful set, thanks for posting them and sharing your technique.
I wonder how you can get near those bugs without making then leave. Do you hypnotize them? Drug them?
Aldebaran wrote:
I wonder how you can get near those bugs without making then leave. Do you hypnotize them? Drug them?
I start telling them my life story, and bore them into a catatonic state.
Excellent Bokeh and good detail of subject. Way to go Douglass.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.