Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What to DO When the DJ takes PHOTOS of Ceremony & Reception and POST on 2 Large TV Screens
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
Dec 5, 2011 12:29:21   #
rob s Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
I have learned over the years that what you say when making / signing an agreement can dramatically change how it works out in practice. Clarifying the exclusivity part of the agreement so that the issue doesn't arise is far better than suffering it or trying to stop it. Clarity beforehand beats confrontation afterwards. The pre-talk is a vital part of any relationship and need constant refinement.

Reply
Dec 5, 2011 12:31:33   #
Messsucherkamera
 
tk wrote:
I'm not saying throw a hissy fit! I'm asking the DJ to please back off and if he is a jerk check with the check writer and see if this was an arrangement with the DJ then ask nicely if they would request the DJ back off. If that does not resolve, shut up, take pictures and store this in the memory banks for the future. Take steps to protect your contract, but don't walk out or cause a scene.


That's what I was trying to say, too.

I don't see how asking whoever is paying you to please get the DJ's assistant to stop interfering with you being able to make the best wedding photographs possible is tantamount to causing a scene or being a jerk.

Reply
Dec 5, 2011 12:39:16   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Unclewiggley wrote:
Guess I got out of the wedding business at the right time. All the ones I did were with 2 1/4 & 4x5 film. Had no problem with videos or someone elses cameras getting in the way. I use to let guest take pictures after I was done with the shot. I'd let the couple stay set up for a few seconds after I was done then go on to the next set up. It was suprising that not many did come and take pictures and the bride and groom was happy that I did that. It's just good business to give a little and I was asked for a card quite a few times.
Guess I got out of the wedding business at the rig... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Dec 5, 2011 12:55:08   #
HR411
 
I agree with mooseeyes. To say that you just need to "talk" to the DJ and "talk" to the couple AFTER contracts or deals have ALREADY been made, WHILE the event is in progress is rediculous! Breach of contract was already committed, meaning the damage was done. Your artistic and professional abilities were already compromised in my book. What should have happened was who ever planned that wedding should have put 2 and 2 together and consulted the photographer ahead of time. There could have even been an arrangement where as the DJ gets to take candid shots during the reception and thats all, and EVEN THEN be in agreement that his shooter is to be no where near the same angle or area as the professional shooter and the Pro gets absolute PRIORITY on his angles and shots! A DJ is for music and to give photography concession to someone who is paid to play music over someone who is paid to provide professional high quality images is, again, rediculous!

Reply
Dec 5, 2011 12:57:46   #
ebaribeault Loc: Baltimore
 
Ahhhh the joys of wedding photography. We have to remember its the bride and grooms special day. We get paid to do a job wether Aunt Jane and her camcorder gets in the way or its someone else. I always get the name of the DJ or band so I can discuss aspects of the wedding they actually can be of help.

Reply
Dec 5, 2011 13:20:31   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
I like Unclewiggly's post. #1, whatever you're shooting, it's got to be far superior to any DJ. When you've processed it, what you present to the bride and groom should be something that they will treasure for the rest of their life....at least 50% of the time!! #2, a few well spoken words by a seasoned pro can control the situation without provoking ill feelings, i.e. "folks, if you'll step aside and allow me to get my shots I'll give you a few seconds to take yours before moving on to the next setup." I don't care what the DJ was shooting, he could have been handled in this way, too. Pics on a tv? Cool idea but the wedding photographer doesn't have time for that. Let the DJ do it as long as he doesn't interfere....and again....a few well placed, but inoffensive words could keep him out of the way.

Reply
Dec 5, 2011 13:31:15   #
SloppyJoe Loc: Walkertown N.C.
 
gsugal wrote:
What would you do if you were hired as the wedding photographer and the DJ has an assistant taking photos of the ceremony and guests at the reception throughout the night-Then shows them on two 42" TV screens next to his speakers. At the ceremony the "shooter" is constantly getting in your way. Our contract stipulates NO other professional photographer is to take photos. DJ says he has it in his contract to do this - and says it 's ONLY photos exclusively for the couple -- Meantime all night your seeing similar photos showing up on two screens. Even the guests are asking if you took that photo earlier .. Would you a) walk, b) talk to groom, 3) make a fuss, ?? .. yes I tried to be nice but I'm ticked OFF to the "s..t" ..GS
What would you do if you were hired as the weddin... (show quote)

First off - I hate that this has happened to you or anyone else. In the mind of a "PRO" - "I have been paid to do a specific job and no one else is listed to do this job per the contract agreement". I (me) understand's this well.
My first answer to your question would have been (A) Walk, but I am kinda a "HotHead" sometimes when I shouldn't be. My next thought "only after reading some of the resonces" is maybe to network with the DJ and come to an agreement about the photo's and who controls that aspect of the wedding or get-to-gether. I think it does stink how this happened and the fault does not lye with the DJ, but how ever it does lye with the planner. You should have already known what to expect from the other hired help at the wedding.How ever, with the job market the way it is I am leaning more towards self presurvation. I would try to network with the DJ and possible score more work and also work out an agreement with anyone else who is hired for your next event. May require a little more homework of the event, but could possible get you the best results. The best of luck to you.
SloppyJoe PS - I hope this makes sense and I didn't jump around to much.

Reply
 
 
Dec 5, 2011 13:36:47   #
Toby
 
Interesting, are you concerned about the quality of your photos vs the DJ? What about friends taking photos and giving them to the couple? What if you were shooting a sporting event, would you insist on no competition?

I would suggest that this be handled up front in your contract cost outlining that you have priority when it comes to poses etc. If you are concerned about others taking and selling photos put it in your contract but don't make an issue of it at the wedding. Making an issue is a sure way to loose future business. I would try to anticipate a problem such as this and charge accordingly.

You might also go to the DJ and suggest he give you a copy of his photos after the wedding so you can post them on your website. Tell him you will give him credit and some of the profits if any sell. He may also want some of yours for his advertising.

Being confrontational on this special day is sure to cause future problems. Be cool and look for an opportunity.

Reply
Dec 5, 2011 14:08:42   #
GENorkus Loc: Washington Twp, Michigan
 
Live with it! Don't let it ruin your day, exspecially your creativity.

How many time have you taken a photo only to find someone else doing the same when you leave the area? Since I cannot purchase every concevably gadget on the market, I consider it flatery since they are making my style of photography so important!

Me personally:
Since I often take photojournal type images, I hate it when people, who insist on being only a couple feet away, wind up stepping into my field of view! (Oh well, I can live with it!) A wedding is enjoyed by them as well as by the B&G.

How many times have you gone through a photo magazine and found similar subject matter in each of them? A different way of looking at it. (I repeat... live with it!)

Reply
Dec 5, 2011 14:42:26   #
LouEllen
 
As the mother of 7, who wants every family wedding to be perfect, I agree that the wedding day belongs to the B&G. In consideration of that fact, I would want (and, yes, even expect) the photographer to inform me if something is going to interfere with his/her ability to create a perfect memory for my son/daughter. Assuming the bridal couple and their parents are not professional photographers, they probably didn't realize the DJ's pics could interfere with the real photography. Who would want to learn that the hard way?

I do not believe it would be confrontational to inform the father of the bride of any conflict. If I were a wedding photographer, I would not walk out on a wedding. I definitely would use it as a learning experience, though.

Perhaps your new contract should specify who/when/where any other person may snap pics. Maybe leave a few minutes here & there just for that purpose.Or even make it part of the entertainment? Have the DJ announce that now is the chance for each of you to be a photographer, so please line up for that perfect photo-op! Pose the wedding party and make a fun time of it for everyone - Aunt Betty, Uncle Joe, the whole crew! No one will take these shots seriously. Not to mention, they will all have the exact same shots.

Lou Ellen

Lou Ellen

Reply
Dec 5, 2011 14:55:06   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
See, I told you we'd have no disagreement!

But I would like to help make sure you don't get near anyone else's weddings either. What a tragedy to ruin someone's wedding with such an attidude.

You don't have a right to know what they hired the DJ to do. You only know what they hired you to do. I am sure it it didn't include creating negative karma at their wedding.

How sad for you and they.

Regards,
Larry Leach

Messsucherkamera wrote:
Hi,

Quite frankly, I have no desire to be near any of your weddings.

It seems to me that it is the DJ and his assistant who have the attitude problem. For some reason, you seem to think that's okay though. I fail to understand this line of thinking.
lleach wrote:
Hi,

We'll never have any problems because with your attitudes you won't be allowed near any of my weddings.

Can I be sure to get your name right when I tell others?

The trick for the rest of us is to learn that there are people out there with such attitudues and to make sure you don't get one at a (hopefully) once in a lifetime event.



Regards,
Larry Leach

Messsucherkamera wrote:
eddier wrote:
Would it have been as professional to go get a portable stereo out of your trunk and started playing your own music?
My thought exactly. I doubt that the DJ would care much for this - and I doubt that he would tolerate such arrogant and self-serving behavior or that he'd "suck it up" or react to such interference with his duties "graciously" as some expect the wedding photographer to.

The DJ and his photographer had exactly zero professionalism and no consideration for the couple, the family who is paying for the wedding photography or the photographer who was there to shoot a job. Such unprofessionalism is not okay and should not be tolerated. It has nothing to do with the ego of the photographer; it's about the quality of the couple's wedding photgraphs.

The wedding photography 1.) will cost the couple (or someone) a significant chunk of cash and should therefore produce images of the highest possible caliber, 2.) is a one time only event - there are no "do-overs," 3.) and is suffering due to the unprofessional behavior of the DJ and his photographer - which will leave the couple with a second rate set of wedding photos.

None of the above is acceptable or even remotely okay. No professional photographer should be expected top "suck it up" and live with it. Would the reception facility tolerate anyone carrying in food that they made and serving it? No they wouldn't.

In that situation, I would have approached whoever was writing the checks for the wedding photography and informed them that the DJ and his photographer were interfering with my ability to discharge my duties in a professional manner and are compromising the quality of the overall wedding photography package that he/she is paying for.

I would gently remind them in a polite and non-aggressive manner that the terms of the contract that they agreed to clearly state that there will be no other photographers permitted to work or interfere with my efforts to photograph the wedding - and that the terms of that contract must be adhered to in order to provide the couple with the highest possible quality of wedding photographs.

I would then ask the check writer to address the problem with the DJ and to ensure that the other photographer's interference cease and desist immediately.

I think that is about as common sense a way that this situation could be dealt with while not causing a confrontation with the DJ's photographer or acting out in an angry and unprofessional manner toward the other photographer or toward the wedding party.

The bottom line is that no one should be allowed to interfere with the execution of the photographer's duties or to compromise the quality and professionalism of his/her work. The couple's wedding photographs are at stake, as is the photographer's reputation. Neither should be allowed to be compromised by the unprofessional behavior of a DJ and his photographer.

JMHO.
quote=eddier Would it have been as professional t... (show quote)
Hi, br br We'll never have any problems because w... (show quote)
Hi, br br Quite frankly, I have no desire to be ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Dec 5, 2011 14:56:00   #
KathyinNH Loc: Kingston, NH
 
dirty dave wrote:
I do alot of weddings. First work along with the DJs catterers and florist if some one calls me to do a wedding I can refer them to the all of their services I even have a few ministers to call on also. Even tho the DJ was showing picture during the reception that should not effect your job. You are in charge of the posed pictures after the ceromony dont' allow any one there to take pictures except yourself. And their pictures should not even compare to yours. I can't even count how many DJs, florist, and ministers have sent weddings to me. To be a decent wedding photographer you have to a politician as well and have the personality that makes people want to work with you. the main point is as the photographer no one else there photos should even come close to yours. There should be a difference between a Photo and a snapshot. Here is a example do you think I would allow anyone to stand over my shoulder to and get this shot these are the shots you have to claim and own.
I do alot of weddings. First work along with the D... (show quote)


Love this shot Dave, you can tell who the professionals are.

Reply
Dec 5, 2011 15:16:59   #
grandaizsa Loc: Chesapeake, Virginia
 
Thank you! Enough said.

Reply
Dec 5, 2011 16:20:19   #
iresq Loc: Annapolis MD
 
My 2 cents...I am a DJ that specialize in weddings. I have done this on more than one occasion. This is an add on service designed to help the party atmosphere and generate more revenue. I have also streamed live video from the dance floor and activities such as garter toss, cake cutting, etc. Until this post, I never even considered the photographers prospective. I will say that I have never had a photographer complain to me about it. As a matter of general practice, I work with the photographers and caterers. Now I would have a problem if my assistant was getting in the way of the photographers.

My contract also affords me the right to post these pics on my website for advertising (and this is a hotly debated topic on the DJ boards).

As Dirty Dave pointed out, I work with/refer/and have been referred work from many vendors (caterers, photographer, venue, etc.) I consider this to be a big part of marketing and it has more than paid for itself.

Understand that the DJ's job is all about the party. Period. In fact, as I tell my clients, the wedding is about the couple, the reception is about the guests. After a wedding the guests don't remember how good the chicken and broccoli was and would be willing to guess most never see the photos. They remember what a great time they had (hopefully). The photographers job is to capture that great time.

The OP stated his contract called for no other "professional" photographer. The DJ is not a professional photographer. No breach of contract.

Be nice to you DJ, were else are you going to store your gear or eat your free meal (and boy do I have an opinion of that, but that's another topic).

Reply
Dec 5, 2011 16:21:03   #
nivek340 Loc: South Hadley Ma.
 
Professional or not. Is it not enough that you got paid or do you have to have complete control? If the answer is yes? Then go to Hollywood and say Cut. Okay now bring the actors.

Weddings are a joyest occasion. If a photographer has trouble with it. Go then, and leave those who want to have a great occasion be.
The great Beatles said, Let it be. They are words of wisdom.

If you start trouble at a Wedding in the moment I'd say you unprofessional and a idiot. There is always ways around this, such breach of contract. It would mean more compensation. If there was no more compensation then you have make a decision do you give in or make your case, but not the day of the Wedding and surely not there at the event. Mind your manners and be a pro.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.