Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
How many pictures - How do you sort them
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Aug 16, 2013 08:58:57   #
mborn Loc: Massachusetts
 
First decide what Program you are going to use to catalog your pictures then develop your workflow
I use Lightroom
My workflow
Import
- if all taken at the same location they are imported into the year folder subfolder location
- if taken at different locations on same card import into year folder under date
- Add keywords
- import
Library
- Review at full screen flag Keep or Delete
- Second review of deletes to make sure I did not miss a good picture the delete all
- Star rate the picture 1-5 Develop your own system for what each star means
Develop
- choose the star picture which means now develop
Export
- I have presets to tell where to export the photos to and what size etc. depending on their use web, blog, portfolio etc

Hope this helps

Reply
Aug 16, 2013 09:11:45   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Crwiwy wrote:
I have seen posts on UHH where people say they have taken many hundreds - perhaps as many as 1000 - pictures in one session.

Recently I went to a steam fair for the first time and ended up with 400 pictures - which is much more than I usually take at once.

This set me thinking - just how do members sort their many hundreds of pictures without getting cross-eyed and losing the will to live?

What is your system and workflow for such a situation?


The basis for my sorting system is after download from the camera, I rename each based on the date of download. I do not leave photos in the camera for more than a day or so. Sometimes, I'll download several sessions from the same day. Having used film and starting this system when I was, here is the way I name my photos. I want each to have a unique name or number. The naming convention I use is this.

Camera Code - date code+"roll number" - exposure number. My memory cards only hold 303 images per each card. So, if I use more than one card the "roll number" is 01, 02, etc.

Thus, a photo taken today during the first session in my D700 and the 10th exposure would be

D700-2013081601-010

A photo taken with my Hasselblad 500C during the same session and the 10th negative on that first roll, developed and scanned is numbered

500C-2013081601-010

This gives each image a unique identifier and makes any database work easy. The additional data of subject, place, etc. is then entered into a database.
--Bob

Reply
Aug 16, 2013 09:13:05   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
rmalarz wrote:
The basis for my sorting system is after download from the camera, I rename each based on the date of download. I do not leave photos in the camera for more than a day or so. Sometimes, I'll download several sessions from the same day. Having used film and starting this system when I was, here is the way I name my photos. I want each to have a unique name or number. The naming convention I use is this.

Camera Code - date code+"roll number" - exposure number. My memory cards only hold 303 images per each card. So, if I use more than one card the "roll number" is 01, 02, etc.

Thus, a photo taken today during the first session in my D700 and the 10th exposure would be

D700-2013081601-010

A photo taken with my Hasselblad 500C during the same session and the 10th negative on that first roll, developed and scanned is numbered

500C-2013081601-010

This gives each image a unique identifier and makes any database work easy. The additional data of subject, place, etc. is then entered into a database. Once transferred from the card to the computer, all of the images are backed up to 3 additional drives prior to any work being done on any of them.
--Bob
The basis for my sorting system is after download ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2013 09:58:34   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
I load them into LR.
My 1st step is to cull all photos based on focus.If they are not crisp,
they are culled.
I then look at them for"are they what I wanted". Composition.
I then make lab adjustments to my liking.Have fun.Cheers.

Reply
Aug 16, 2013 10:12:34   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
Have to endorse your observations.

I tend to think that shooting 1,000 or so shots at a single event is really taking a movie and then picking out some frames to reproduce.



rpavich wrote:
I don't...I'm like you...400-600 is a LOT of images to take at one place or one time. I was taking a LOT when I was photographing Lacrosse, but that was motordrive and for a purpose....but with any other shooting?

I don't subscribe to the "Spray-n-Pray" method.

Reply
Aug 16, 2013 11:09:08   #
stonecherub Loc: Tucson, AZ
 
Crwiwy: You might want to investigate a Digital Asset Management System, a database for your images. I presume you want some way to find just "that" particular image among the thousands on your disk.

This requires an investment greater than you made for your camera, that was just money. I'm talking about time. There will be an initial investment of time learning the bells and whistles of the DAMS you choose. I started with ID Imager and then switched to IMatch when the IDI developer went walkabout. There are others like Adobe Bridge that I think is part of Lightroom but have tried to avoid to focus on one system.

The second investment of time is in your workflow. I spend a day in the field stumbling over the rocks and return to the beer cooler at dusk with 2-600 images on my Nikon. A field day's worth of images may be 4-5 days work in front of the computer. I have single images, panorama sets, and stereo sets.

Within the DAMS, I established categories, and labels that I assign (take a lot of time) and all the metadata from the camera as well as geo-location from combining my day's GPS track with the timed images in the day folder. IMatch can show me all of my "best" images that contain volcanic bombs on the C flow within 100 m of a particular point (Lat/Long) where the exposures were made before 10 am at shutter speeds greater than 1/1000.

If you expect to have a lot of images like I do, the DAMS is essential. You will spend time learning it (as with photoshop, you will always be learning something new) and you will spend time integrating your images in it.

Something to think about, good luck.

Reply
Aug 16, 2013 14:50:55   #
HangtownGal Loc: Placerville CA
 
I often come home from trips with 4000 - 9000 photos. I sort by when & where, ie
2013 Croatia
2009 Greece
Santorini
Corfu
Athens
2009 Italy
Rome
Venice
Messina
Florence
2010 NYC
2005 New England
2003 Carmel

Works for me. Everything is kept on external drive.

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2013 14:50:55   #
HangtownGal Loc: Placerville CA
 
I often come home from trips with 4000 - 9000 photos. I sort by when & where, ie
2013 Croatia
2009 Greece
Santorini
Corfu
Athens
2009 Italy
Rome
Venice
Messina
Florence
2010 NYC
2005 New England
2003 Carmel

Works for me. Everything is kept on external drive.

Reply
Aug 16, 2013 15:23:53   #
Baguas Loc: Southern California
 
I like this! Will try it before I slit my wrists!

Reply
Aug 16, 2013 15:25:40   #
Baguas Loc: Southern California
 
I like this! Will try it before I slit my wrists!

Reply
Aug 16, 2013 18:15:35   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
mdorn wrote:
I delete 80 to 90% of all photos! As my skills have improved, the number of shots have gone down and the number of keepers have gone up. My workflow is delete, delete, delete, keep, delete, delete, delete, keep. Out of 400, I would maybe keep 40. Nobody wants to see your crappy shots, and keeping all images just makes it harder for you to find the good ones later. -Mark


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2013 18:40:49   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
I forgot one thing,try use a small card to limit how many captures you take.I do this and it forces me to think more before capturing.

Reply
Aug 17, 2013 18:04:15   #
DarLyn Ranch Loc: Randleman, NC.
 
mdorn is right, I do the same, delete, delete. He is right to say, who needs to see your bad shot's, not even you and true, you clog up your good files.

Reply
Aug 17, 2013 18:35:39   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
DarLyn Ranch wrote:
mdorn is right, I do the same, delete, delete. He is right to say, who needs to see your bad shot's, not even you and true, you clog up your good files.


I do a bit of tutoring. Those "bad" photos make great illustrations of mistakes and how to recognize them.
--Bob

Reply
Aug 17, 2013 18:37:31   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
rmalarz wrote:
I do a bit of tutoring. Those "bad" photos make great illustrations of mistakes and how to recognize them.
--Bob


Heck, I'll send ya a box full if ya like!!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.