Who ever originated this joke (?) had to have too much time on their hands.
Sarge69
The intent of this was to be funny...however...
"Next."
"Good morning. We want to apply for a marriage license."
"Names?""Tim and Jim Jones."
"Jones?? Are you related?? I see a resemblance."
"Yes, we're brothers."
"Brothers?? You can't get married."
"Why not?? Aren't you giving marriage licenses to same gender couples?"
"Yes, thousands. But we haven't had any siblings. That's incest!"
"Incest?" No, we are not gay."
"Not gay?? Then why do you want to get married?"
"For the financial benefits, of course. And we do love each other. Besides, we don't have any other prospects."
"But we're issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples who'vebeen denied equal protection under the law. If you are not gay, you can get married to a woman."
"Wait a minute. A gay man has the same right to marry a woman as I have. But just because I'm straight doesn't mean I want to marry a woman. I want to marry Jim."
"And I want to marry Tim, Are you going to discriminate against us just because we are not gay?"
"All right, all right. I'll give you your license. Next. "Keep goingÂ…"Hi. We are here to get married."Names?"
"John Smith, Jane James, Robert Green, and June Johnson.""Who wants to marry whom?"
"We all want to marry each other."
"But there are four of you!"
"That's right. You see, we're all bisexual. I love Jane and Robert, Jane loves me and June, June loves Robert and Jane, and Robert loves June and me. All of us getting married together is the only way that we can express our sexual preferences in a marital relationship."
"But we've only been granting licenses to gay and lesbian couples."
"So you're discriminating against bisexuals!"
"No, it's just that, well, the traditional idea of marriage is that it's just for couples."
"Since when are you standing on tradition?"
"Well, I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere."
"Who says?? There's no logical reason to limit marriage to couples. The more the better. Besides, we demand our rights! The mayor says the constitution guarantees equal protection under the law. Give us a marriage license!" Still goingÂ…"All right, all right. Next."
"Hello, I'd like a marriage license.""In what names?"
"David Deets."
"And the other man?"
"That's all. I want to marry myself."
"Marry yourself?? What do you mean?"
"Well, my psychiatrist says I have a dual personality, so I want to marry the two together. Maybe I can file a joint income-tax return."
"That does it!? I quit!!? You people are making a mockery of marriage!!"
Lmao!!!! Thanks i needed that on a monday
Very good. Makes a good point. :thumbup:
I like the insight but the punch line is a little weak. :thumbup:
Not that funny as a joke but it's already happening.
Pedophiles are lobbying to have their preference recognized. Instead of Pedophoiles, they will be "minor-attracted" people.
There are already people calling for multiple partner marriage in the U.S. also.
And there is no logical reason to stop any of them...as long as it's something that you want, that makes you happy, then it's ok.
n3eg
Loc: West coast USA
I do think anybody should be able to designate any one "dependent" for insurance and tax purposes, whether it's your kid, grandkid, grandma, brother, roommate, or drinking buddy. As long as they're a human, I don't see any difference.
n3eg wrote:
I do think anybody should be able to designate any one "dependent" for insurance and tax purposes, whether it's your kid, grandkid, grandma, brother, roommate, or drinking buddy. As long as they're a human, I don't see any difference.
Well...the obvious question is: Why stop at the artificial/arbitrary dividing line of being human?
If I had my way....men could marry Pugs and they could claim Pugs as dependants.... :)
n3eg wrote:
I do think anybody should be able to designate any one "dependent" for insurance and tax purposes, whether it's your kid, grandkid, grandma, brother, roommate, or drinking buddy. As long as they're a human, I don't see any difference.
so why don't we change the insurance and tax laws not marriage laws? I'm pretty sick of hearing about gay rights and the nasty mental images that go with it. Sex of all kinds needs to be put back in the closet. Sex should not be and never should have been a topic of public discussion.
ConnieLynn wrote:
so why don't we change the insurance and tax laws not marriage laws? I'm pretty sick of hearing about gay rights and the nasty mental images that go with it. Sex of all kinds needs to be put back in the closet. Sex should not be and never should have been a topic of public discussion.
Sorta like 'different strokes for different folks'
Sarge69
sarge69 wrote:
Sorta like 'different strokes for different folks'
Sarge69
There you go with that nasty sex talk again!!
Has anyone noticed that muslims don't have these problems?
hamtrack wrote:
Has anyone noticed that muslims don't have these problems?
Muslims can't eat delicious BBQ Pork Ribs
Muslims can see naked women. ( Why have eyes?)
Muslims have to bend over to pray.
Muslims wives can't sing, dance or wear Victoria Secret stuff.
No wonder they have no qualms about suicide.
Sarge69
I think there is something so very terribly final about blowing yourself and everyone around the area- UP, don't you? I suppose one might assume that they eventually get a good look at whats behind those burkas and since they can't have a drink to mitigate the shock, say "whats the use"? I think they do have goats though.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.