More good reasons to do proper post processing.
Very well done
Thanks for sharing
Len
s2hrts wrote:
I'm w/ you in regard to editing. I think it was Scott Kelby who said (paraphrasing here) in today's digital world a lot of the time you take a shot just to be able to bring it into PS.
99% of the time I PS my images. It's no different then Ansel Adams manipulating images in the dark room.
We shoot because we have a vision and we use both the camera, and our skill with it and with editing to bring it to fruition.
BTW, those are some pretty neat shots, especially "the family" and the cranes, if that's what they were. Sorry, I get lost after parakeet!
I'm w/ you in regard to editing. I think it was S... (
show quote)
My Scott Kelby is so dog eared I can hardly find the right page. As my friend Harvey knows so well, that for every minute I spend on a good photograph I could devote an hour to it in PP.
I often can't wait to get back to my CS6 when I know I have a good one on the card.
Your 'cranes' are Great White Egrets. That wasn't a ballet either. They were fighting and a Red-winged Blackbird was watching from a post.
Thanks for joining in my friend.
Erv wrote:
Very nice post Joe!! I always do the same thing. Put the maybe's aside and look at them later.:) Some I can tweak and save others go in the trash can. But I have to get better at post. This winter will be a big learning curve, as I have finally gotten PSE11 to put in the computer.:):)
Erv
I wish you luck with your new program Erv. I'm sure you'll do well with it. Thanks a lot for visiting again.
cur
Loc: rochester ny
Joe way to hard on yourself.
#1 the squirrel isn't looking at you which is okay and yes his mouth is blocked by nothing wrong with that it's a natural pose in nature. Good picture, clear and the lighting is good.
#2The fawn shot is great the pose with the legs is fantastic. It's the kind of shot I like because it's, not your standard four feet on the ground walking. ( not the standard deer picture we all take) the PP is done well. a keeper for sure.
Could do this on all of them. They are pictures to be proud of. Other than you most people wouldn't even notice what you see. You have the PP down and that is not a bad thing. It's a tool like a long or short lens. PP today is a lot easier than what folks did in the dark room years ago and cheaper.
Okay I'll get off my soap box. Nice series any way you look at them.
Joe F.N. wrote:
This set of images was taken recently but was still in the "to do" file. I'm very big on post processing and will never understand the SOOC (straight out of camera) club.
Not doing PP is like saying to the viewer, "I've taken a picture for you to look at but I really don't feel like making it the best I can." Not only does PP allow you to enhance an already good picture (since bad ones are non-recoverable) but it gives you a chance to study it carefully to see what changes are required to make it easier on the eye.
These pictures were probably still in the "to do" file because I had chosen others at the time, that took precedence over the 'also ran.'
Here are my thoughts on some of these.
This set of images was taken recently but was sti... (
show quote)
First of all Joe Wow,loved them all. As far as blow out I usually do a lot of processing in raw and then open to PS.In the layer palette I click on curve ,then use the pickers.Usually the top one(black) and the the bottom one(white) A lot of the times it helps out.
Joe: Another great set Sir. I especially like the flowers framed by the fence posts and the last one with the the little goose looking straight ahead. The goose looking back, looks like he was looking for the rest of the little ones.
I would love to spend a day with you out on a photo shoot. I could really learn from you.
Thanks for posting
Steve
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. You are very professional in your approach and your self critiques are helpful to all. Sometimes you just are not crazy about a photo and don't know why. Either it hits you or doesn't but some times if not most, you can create something in pp that was just ok when captured. Good for you.
Steve
Joe, I love this thread! It was extremely interesting to read how you go about your self-critiques and I also enjoyed reading the varying responses so far.
One of the many things I love about UHH is the variety of posts: from drop-dead gorgeous art to grab shots of a fun or special moment in time in which we can share the photographer's joy or awe.
And the same goes for the levels of skill and/or interest in post processing. It's been fascinating to read opinions (usually strong!) in this area. Thanks!
Joe F.N. wrote:
This set of images was taken recently but was still in the "to do" file. I'm very big on post processing and will never understand the SOOC (straight out of camera) club.
Not doing PP is like saying to the viewer, "I've taken a picture for you to look at but I really don't feel like making it the best I can." Not only does PP allow you to enhance an already good picture (since bad ones are non-recoverable) but it gives you a chance to study it carefully to see what changes are required to make it easier on the eye.
These pictures were probably still in the "to do" file because I had chosen others at the time, that took precedence over the 'also ran.'
Here are my thoughts on some of these.
This set of images was taken recently but was sti... (
show quote)
Great shots Joe! Like them all.
:thumbup: :thumbup:
This reminds me very much of a wife or Girlfriend who spends 3 hours on her hair and makeup and then breathlessly asks you how she looks and then is poised to blow your head off if you just say "You look Fine" dear....
Venturer9
birdpix
Loc: South East Pennsylvania
Joe, you never progress if you settle for "good enough". You must be hard on yourself and highly critical of your own work. Family and friends do not make grrod critics. We only need to look at the work of National Geographic or Smithsonian photographers to see how far we have to go. Thanks for a great post!
As a newbie I like the way all of the experience in this group is helping me to see some of the things that make the difference between a good snapshot and a superb photo. Your post has me looking at my photos much more closely. Think you for giving me another look inside a good photographers head.
Great pics. The robin is an awesome pic. About the best you can do with ground birds
cur wrote:
Joe way to hard on yourself.
#1 the squirrel isn't looking at you which is okay and yes his mouth is blocked by nothing wrong with that it's a natural pose in nature. Good picture, clear and the lighting is good.
#2The fawn shot is great the pose with the legs is fantastic. It's the kind of shot I like because it's, not your standard four feet on the ground walking. ( not the standard deer picture we all take) the PP is done well. a keeper for sure.
Could do this on all of them. They are pictures to be proud of. Other than you most people wouldn't even notice what you see. You have the PP down and that is not a bad thing. It's a tool like a long or short lens. PP today is a lot easier than what folks did in the dark room years ago and cheaper.
Okay I'll get off my soap box. Nice series any way you look at them.
Joe way to hard on yourself. br #1 the squirrel is... (
show quote)
Stay on the soap box Cur. I enjoyed the analogy. I believe that doing PP is as important as taking the picture. Results come from the whole package and not just 1/2 of it. Thanks for joining in.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.