JR1 Loc: Tavistock, Devon, UK

May many years ago the Canon EODS10 was THE Pro camera to own, now it would be considered poor, a D7000 seen fifteen years ago would have been considered star wars technology and way way pro, it is a matter of perspective.

TonyP Loc: New Zealand

I have been using the D300s for a couple of years with the D200 now as an unneeded backup.
If the majority of your pics are going to be low light or you are just a keen amateur, get the D7100.
The D300s is a fantastic, solid, brilliant focus system, all round pro DX camera.
Handle a D300s, then handle the d7100.
It's always going to be a personal choice, just like cars.
But just because the manufacturer brings out a new model, that doesn't mean the old model is any less worthy.
If its DX format is what you want, the only regret you might have is if Nikon bring out a D400 in the next couple of months.
I might buy the newer model when it comes out, but, it will have to be very good to motivate me to do so.

By the way, never had one problem with either the d200 (I have 2) or the D300s.
Cheers

The Villages Loc: The Villages, Florida

I wish I had a camera store nearby, but the only one in town that I purchased my D200 from got out of the sales end. They just couldn't compete with the big box stores, ie. Best Buy, B&H & Adorama.

Knowing the feel of the 200, I'm sure I'd like the 300s...or 400 if it should ever materialize. As orginally stated, my concern is dealing with a "new" model and the unknown probelms that often arise. A 400 will definitely be an upgrade, but I assume the 300s will have worked out any problems that it may have had.

DickC Loc: NE Washington state

I've never figured out all the things my D200 can do, so I'm waiting for a maybe D200½ first!

LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field

This is true of most models. When I go through the manual of my D300- I'm constantly amazed. My philosophy has been that when the gear is the limitation, then that's the time to upgrade.

TonyP Loc: New Zealand

Thats a very good philosophy :thumbup:

Peter Boyd Loc: Blyth nr. Newcastle U.K.

I understand your point of view, but my point was that Nikon themselves do not class the D7000 as a 'pro model', and considering all that the camera can do, this can only be because of the build quality, which was my original argument. I never intended to knock the D7000, it is a fine camera, but you still don't get that same feeling that you do when handling the D300s. Years ago in the 1960's there was an advert that simply stated "Just Hold an Asahi Pentax", and they were right!

craggycrossers Loc: Robin Hood Country, UK

Hi - early Sunday evening here in the UK and, being a D300 user I thought I'd now chip in.

Some of the comments I've read in this thread appear to want to convince you of the benefits of the D7000/D7100. Both undoubtedly excellent cameras, IF YOU WANT ONE !!

I haven't seen you say anywhere that you're interested in or want one ! So why do people repeat the same old process and try to convince you that "theirs is better"? What you DO say is that you're interested in "production reliability" (proven track record) and, just as importantly, "I'm not in the pro ranks, so the latest and greatest isn't a necessity". You want views on the D300s, preferably from people who have used or are still using them.

PCity, read what Thom Hogan (one of your fellow Americans) says about the D300/D300s. Google him and you'll find it quickly, but here's a couple of his comments - "D300s - still a D300 but with video" - "can't afford a D700, then get a D300" - "D300, an instant classic" - "if you can live with it's sensor limits the rest of the camera is pro in every way".

I'm like you and also don't need the "latest and greatest", but I have 2 of these D300's (don't need video) and absolutely love them for WHAT THEY DO FOR ME. Shutter count on both models is less than 25,000 and they will go on for a long time yet, provided I just look after them. If I need higher ISO capability I go with my Fuji X-E1.

Chances are that a D400 will come along at some stage. However, for you, and maybe many others, it will need to establish a record of reliability. And it will be horrendously expensive in comparison with a good used D300/D300s.

It's not my place to tell you what you should do. That's your decision. But I hope you appreciate my comments and get my drift. I hope you let us know which direction you decide to go.

Regards from a warm and balmy summer's evening in the UK.

craggycrossers Loc: Robin Hood Country, UK

Not sure how, or why, this one appeared as well !!

Hi - early Sunday evening here in the UK and, being a D300 user I thought I'd now chip in.

Some of the comments I've read in this thread appear to want to convince you of the benefits of the D7000/D7100. Both undoubtedly excellent cameras, IF YOU WANT ONE !!

I haven't seen you say anywhere that you're interested in or want one ! So why do people repeat the the same old process and try to convince you that "theirs is better"? What you DO say is that you're interested in "production reliability (proven track record) and, just as importantly, "I'm not in the pro ranks, so the latest and greatest isn't a necessity". You want views on the D300s, preferably from people who have used or are still using them.

PCity, read what Thom Hogan (one of your fellow Americans) says about the D300/D300s. Google him and you'll find it quickly, but here's a couple of his comments - "D300s - still a D300 but with video" - "can't afford a D700, then get a D300" - "D300, an instant classic" - "if you can live with it's sensor limits the rest of the camera is pro in every way".

I'm like you and also don't need the "latest and greatest", but I have 2 of these D300's (don't need video) and absolutely love them for WHAT THEY DO FOR ME. Shutter count on both models is less than 25,000 and they will go on for a long time yet, provided I just look after them. If I need higher ISO capability I go with my Fuji X-E1.

Chances are that a D400 will come along at some stage. However, for you, and maybe many others, it will need to establish a record of reliability. And it will be horrendously expensive in comparison with a good used D300/D300s.

It's not my place to tell you what you should do. That's your decision. But I hope you appreciate my comments and get my drift. I hope you let us know which direction you decide to go.

Regards from a warm and balmy summer's evening in the UK.

urb.era

thank you for youre input,shoot on!

craggycrossers Loc: Robin Hood Country, UK

Whose post are you referring to ? Use "Quote Reply" button you'll see at the bottom of each post. Scroll to the bottom of the new box and make your response. That way everyone can follow you better.

Do you intend for everyone NOT to know where you are? It's the default for "Location" in your profile. This is a world-wide forum, and for me at least, it's good to see where people are in the world.