Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
1900's Female Photojournalist.
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jul 23, 2013 14:27:13   #
joehel2 Loc: Cherry Hill, NJ
 
The photo speaks for itself; I'll never complain about the weight of my camera and tripod again. (This is one of several early photos I received in an email, I don't know the origin)

1900's Female Photojournalist
1900's Female Photojournalist...

Reply
Jul 23, 2013 14:39:27   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
Sure makes today's photography seem like "child's play" !!

Reply
Jul 24, 2013 06:34:14   #
Dlevon Loc: New Jersey
 
joehel2 wrote:
The photo speaks for itself; I'll never complain about the weight of my camera and tripod again. (This is one of several early photos I received in an email, I don't know the origin)


Wow! Who wants to go back to the good old days!

Reply
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jul 24, 2013 06:51:01   #
Moray Loc: East Coast Canada
 
The hair do is something else. I wonder if there is a picture, that she may have taken, of the other photographer somewhere.

Reply
Jul 24, 2013 07:08:10   #
ejrmaine Loc: South Carolina
 
Thanks for sharing, the photo says volumes.
:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jul 24, 2013 08:03:13   #
abc1234 Loc: Elk Grove Village, Illinois
 
Taking the picture was just the beginning. She had to go back to her darkroom, develop the film, make a contact print, figure out what to burn in or hold back and then print again. And she probably toned the print when done, mounted it, framed it and put it up somewhere.

And I forget to mention she had to mix her own chemicals and with every new batch of raw materials, film or paper, she would have to recalibrate everything.

How many digital photos do you think you can turn out in this time?

Reply
Jul 24, 2013 10:08:06   #
flyguy Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico
 
Thanks for posting --- seeing this makes me grateful for living in this era with all of the fine, lightweight gear that we enjoy!

Reply
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jul 24, 2013 10:13:31   #
Bill Houghton Loc: New York area
 
The funny part, she was a candid photographer. That would explain the running stance she has. I bet her cloths weigh as much as the camera.

Reply
Jul 24, 2013 10:17:13   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
You could turn out thousands of digital photos but unfortunately most would be throw aways. There is something to be said for taking ones time to consider the subject and then compose the shot.





abc1234 wrote:
Taking the picture was just the beginning. She had to go back to her darkroom, develop the film, make a contact print, figure out what to burn in or hold back and then print again. And she probably toned the print when done, mounted it, framed it and put it up somewhere.

And I forget to mention she had to mix her own chemicals and with every new batch of raw materials, film or paper, she would have to recalibrate everything.

How many digital photos do you think you can turn out in this time?
Taking the picture was just the beginning. She ha... (show quote)

Reply
Jul 24, 2013 22:17:51   #
etcraig Loc: Chandler, Az
 
I looked up John Fornes & Co on Google: http://www.onlinebiographies.info/ny/erie/a-l/fornes-john.htm
Stores in New York and Bufflo

Reply
Jul 24, 2013 22:33:22   #
Atg Ni Loc: Flagstaff, Arizona
 
If you search the name "John Fornes & Company, Woolens" you'll find reference to him & company in Buffalo, NY around the 1850's. Doesn't give any clue as to whom the woman might be but dates her and the equipment. Very cool photo.

Reply
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Jul 25, 2013 03:36:59   #
clcorbett2 Loc: Bangor, Me
 
Her name is Jessie Tarbox. I received the same email which had her name under the picture.



Reply
Jul 25, 2013 06:03:27   #
ASR666 Loc: Singapore
 
that's a great picture ! thanks for sharing

Reply
Jul 25, 2013 06:11:34   #
crimesc324 Loc: West Palm Beach, Florida
 
and the case on the sidewalk probably holds all her film plates. Wonder how many memeory cards can fit in there?

Reply
Jul 25, 2013 07:08:27   #
ASR666 Loc: Singapore
 
but ... 160 years later we can still see and admire her work of art. Minimal deterioration and a work of high quality.

I'm yet to see similar quality with digital. Most digital prints fade or discolor within a few years and disk drives turn unreadable.

Yes, it was a huge effort making those photos but like fine art and fine wine, they only get better with age !

:)

abc1234 wrote:
Taking the picture was just the beginning. She had to go back to her darkroom, develop the film, make a contact print, figure out what to burn in or hold back and then print again. And she probably toned the print when done, mounted it, framed it and put it up somewhere.

And I forget to mention she had to mix her own chemicals and with every new batch of raw materials, film or paper, she would have to recalibrate everything.

How many digital photos do you think you can turn out in this time?
Taking the picture was just the beginning. She ha... (show quote)

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.