I recently got a Nikon D3100 with a Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Lens. I am struggling with the focus and depth of field with it. Here is an (non-artistic, but good technical) example. A piece of paper a few feet away; Maybe a slight angle, but less than 45 degrees (and mainly on the vertical axis). Any insight as to why the Rivera can be sharp, an the "M", a few inches away, is out of focus? It doesn't seem to me that f/6 would be wide enough to cause the DoF to be that shallow.
(in case, you were curious, we were touring the Waterford factory when they were making a crystal trophy for Mariana Rivera; this was part of the pattern.)
FYI, I am traveling so my responses may be delayed.
Thanks, in advance, for your help.
JoeBiker wrote:
I recently got a Nikon D3100 with a Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Lens. I am struggling with the focus and depth of field with it. Here is an (non-artistic, but good technical) example. A piece of paper a few feet away; Maybe a slight angle, but less than 45 degrees (and mainly on the vertical axis). Any insight as to why the Rivera can be sharp, an the "M", a few inches away, is out of focus? It doesn't seem to me that f/6 would be wide enough to cause the DoF to be that shallow.
(in case, you were curious, we were touring the Waterford factory when they were making a crystal trophy for Mariana Rivera; this was part of the pattern.)
FYI, I am traveling so my responses may be delayed.
Thanks, in advance, for your help.
I recently got a Nikon D3100 with a Sigma 18-250mm... (
show quote)
Nikon D3100, 135mm lens @ f/6 DoF is less than 2 inches with a subject distance of 5 feet.
The sharpest parts of the image are the letters "era", everything else is outside of the DoF range.
If you have not yet seen the Dofmaster site, give it a whirl.
http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html
OK, thanks to both of you for your help.
JR1
Loc: Tavistock, Devon, UK
Don't think that my reply "Read this" was blunt, being dyslexic I find posting helpful links easier
JoeBiker wrote:
I recently got a Nikon D3100 with a Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Lens. I am struggling with the focus and depth of field with it. Here is an (non-artistic, but good technical) example. A piece of paper a few feet away; Maybe a slight angle, but less than 45 degrees (and mainly on the vertical axis). Any insight as to why the Rivera can be sharp, an the "M", a few inches away, is out of focus? It doesn't seem to me that f/6 would be wide enough to cause the DoF to be that shallow.
(in case, you were curious, we were touring the Waterford factory when they were making a crystal trophy for Mariana Rivera; this was part of the pattern.)
FYI, I am traveling so my responses may be delayed.
Thanks, in advance, for your help.
I recently got a Nikon D3100 with a Sigma 18-250mm... (
show quote)
Because your depth of field at 135mm f/5.6 (closest I could get to f/6 and 36 inches from subject you'd have only .35 of an inch of the subject that would be in focus. You must learn DOF (depth of field) to understand. Here's a snap shot of a DOF calculator.
JR1 wrote:
Don't think that my reply "Read this" was blunt, being dyslexic I find posting helpful links easier
No Problem at all. I had a technical understanding of DoF, and Aperture; but this is my first real zoom lens, and I didn't realize that it would become so severe. The DoF calculator was helpful, and the tutorial explained the implications of the zoom. I now know not to use the zoom as a crutch, and to "get closer, and then get closer" (and crack up the F stop).
Thanks again (to all of you) for your help.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.