Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
W/R Histograms
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
Jul 20, 2013 08:57:02   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
winterrose wrote:
Very awkward and cumbersome,weighs a ton, and they are hen's teeth. Get a Sekonic....


I have a Sekonic 758DR and love it. However, the SEI is a great meter, if for no other reason than to the weird out TSA agents when I travel with it in my carry on bag.

Oh, and speaking of weighing a ton, my view camera is not the lightest thing to carry either.
--Bob

Reply
Jul 20, 2013 09:18:14   #
winterrose Loc: Kyneton, Victoria, Australia
 
rmalarz wrote:
I have a Sekonic 758DR and love it. However, the SEI is a great meter, if for no other reason than to the weird out TSA agents when I travel with it in my carry on bag.

Oh, and speaking of weighing a ton, my view camera is not the lightest thing to carry either.
--Bob


I generally buy the best and be done with it and I've found the 758 is just that. View camera eh? You must have very big muscles. Hardly a point and shoot, I thought the D3 was bad! Cheers, Rob.

Reply
Jul 20, 2013 09:18:53   #
DBPhotos Loc: Out There Somewhere
 
winterrose wrote:
It appears that there is a degree of misunderstanding of what a histogram actually is and exactly what information it displays.

I will reference this to jpeg images for the sake of this thread and for all those ready to correct me on unhelpful technical details please allow me some licence in order to keep this as understandable for as many people as possible.

That’s probably enough for now, I’ll let this sink in and settle for a bit before I continue. Rob.


Thank you Winterrose, I would like to highlight your request for for licence in this. (So many individuals just want to be heard) I am fairly new to photography and I very much appretiate Persons like yourself that make effort to help those of us who drown in detail. Please continue.

Thank you again,
DBpics :lol: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Jul 20, 2013 09:59:45   #
Ralloh Loc: Ohio
 
winterrose wrote:
I really couldn't be bothered, thanks....(P.S. What is an apperent? Must be something common in Ohio...can somebody please provide me with edification on that one?)


No it's actually apparent to anyone who recognizes snobbish, boorish jerks who put down anyone who might disagree with him. You, my friend, and a couple of others are the reason I will never contribute to this cesspool of a forum again. I'll just learn new things by reading. Now go ahead and take a pot shot at me, like you have so many times. I really don't give a sh*t.

Reply
Jul 20, 2013 10:56:49   #
Rathyatra Loc: Southport, United Kingdom
 
winterrose wrote:
I agree, ziggykor, I have tried before with a thread about lumination/illumination and other subjects but people seemed only willing to make fun or just ignore. Ah well, their loss.


Most of us don't understand, or wish to understand, the subtle technical nuances about this gray question.

Pleas keep posting your useful information as for us less technically advanced people that is more than sufficient to ensure we understand the purpose and benefit of the histogram and it's relevance to Gray - 18%-13% or 12%.

If the picture we take shows a modicum of difference in relation to the shade of the brim of aunt bessie's hat in a wedding picture I am sure we can take that on board.

Thanks again for the info.

Reply
Jul 20, 2013 20:57:11   #
RWCRNC Loc: Pennsylvania
 
winterrose wrote:
I did misunderstand you and I humbly take back what I said to you.

I hope that you try to understand that there are always one or two people who are too stupid to understand when it is more appropriate just to keep quiet.

My reference to 12 f/stops is an arbitrary figure selected to provide a reference for the purpose of explanation of a point.

There are references to modern CMOS sensors achieving dynamic range of 13.5 f/stops.

I hope you can forgive my outburst and that you glean something from my attempts for explanation. Regards, Rob.
I did misunderstand you and I humbly take back wha... (show quote)


Of course, and thank you

Reply
Jul 20, 2013 23:35:12   #
Hawknest Loc: South Georgia
 
winterrose wrote:
It appears that there is a degree of misunderstanding of what a histogram actually is and exactly what information it displays.

I will reference this to jpeg images for the sake of this thread and for all those ready to correct me on unhelpful technical details please allow me some licence in order to keep this as understandable for as many people as possible.

A histogram is an x,y representation shown as a series of columns representing black on the left brightness with a relative luminance value of 0 and white at the extreme right with its luminance value of 255 while the space between is filled with the remaining 254 columns representing the luminance values of all the shades graduating from black through to white.

The 18% much talked about is “middle grey” which, of course, falls in the centre of the histogram and holds the luminance value of 127.

The important thing to remember here is that any histogram is not an absolute. Any given histogram is tightly related to a particular parametric circumstance. What that means is that a histogram display in a camera displays the range of luminousities within the limits of the dynamic range of that particular camera.

If one camera has a dynamic range of twelve f/stops and another is capable of six and both were used to photograph a tonal sweep, say a surface with an luminance range of fifteen equivalent f/stops in sunlight with exposure set for an 18% grey card then both histograms would look much the same even though camera (a) recorded six stops either side of the middle whilst camera (b) only managed three.

The histogram on both cameras would show that values were recorded in all the columns 0-255 because in these cases the information they display is limited to the actual dynamic range of each sensor.

The 6 f/stop sensor in this case would record as black a luminance value which the 12 f/stop sensor would record as 9% grey.

Likewise the 6 f/stopper would record a shade as being white whereas the 12 would only record the same luminance value as being around 60% grey.

In other words the 12 stop sensor would in one shot record the same range as the 6 stop sensor could if shot as a +3,0,-3 f/stop HDR.

The 12 stopper would have twice as much shadow and highlight detail even though the histograms would probably look much the same.

That’s probably enough for now, I’ll let this sink in and settle for a bit before I continue. Rob.
It appears that there is a degree of misunderstand... (show quote)


i'm not sure i understand any of this. how is this going to help me take better photographs.

Reply
 
 
Jul 21, 2013 01:04:08   #
winterrose Loc: Kyneton, Victoria, Australia
 
Hawknest wrote:
i'm not sure i understand any of this. how is this going to help me take better photographs.


Hi, Hawknest, most amateur photographers don't understand what information the histogram can convey to them nor how to use that information. That is precisely what I am attempting to remedy to some extent. If you are lost or confused, please don't be preturbed by this subject, it's not vital by any means. Perhaps read my "W/R" threads again and feel free to ask more specific questions if you like. Cheers, Rob.

Reply
Jul 21, 2013 01:18:52   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
Hawknest wrote:
i'm not sure i understand any of this. how is this going to help me take better photographs.

If you can watch your histogram while composing the shot, you can avoid components that will either bury details or blow out highlights. At the museum, there is one shot people like to take. They like to sit in the engineer's seat of a huge locomotive, put the left hand on the throttle and rest
the right forearm on the armrest; it can be made to look as if they are actually running a locomotive. Unfortunately the scene is backlit. With the histogram in the viewfinder or on the screen, I can find that one angle that eliminates the backlight but shows the interior details of the cab. That is the only way, short of taking numerous shots, to get the exposure range correct.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.