canon lens
Jun 29, 2013 20:03:39 #
Jun 29, 2013 20:08:56 #
lighthouse
Loc: No Fixed Abode
The non L is a brilliant lens with great optics.
The images are so sharp.
It is a smaller, lighter cheaper lens with just as good or better images.
It is not weathersealed.
If you need weathersealed get the L.
If you do not need weathersealed then the non L is brilliant too.
I use the non L in light drizzle, nothing has happened to it yet.
The images are so sharp.
It is a smaller, lighter cheaper lens with just as good or better images.
It is not weathersealed.
If you need weathersealed get the L.
If you do not need weathersealed then the non L is brilliant too.
I use the non L in light drizzle, nothing has happened to it yet.
Jun 29, 2013 20:17:37 #
If you've got lots of money to burn, go for the "L". I have the non L 100 macro and am very pleased. Check out my Flickr page for examples of macro with the non L lens. Good luck!
Jun 29, 2013 20:31:07 #
Like lighthouse I have the non L also. It is a really sharp lens. When shooting macro I usually use a tripod so the lack of IS on the non L lens is not an issue for me but I can see where it could be an advantage that some would want. If using for other than macro, maybe portraits, and handheld the IS would be nice but I have other lens in the 100mm range with IS. TNmike
Jun 29, 2013 20:35:59 #
Coolcameragirl wrote:
If you've got lots of money to burn, go for the "L". I have the non L 100 macro and am very pleased. Check out my Flickr page for examples of macro with the non L lens. Good luck!
WOW Coolcameragirl! I had never visited your flickr page before! Really nice photos and as can be seen the 100mm non L is really great, especially in your hands!! TNmike
Jun 29, 2013 20:39:49 #
datsdeep wrote:
Between the two: Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro USM. or 100mm f/2.8L macro IS USM..... And why?
The L is weather sealed and has a superb IS. The glass may be a little better
Jun 29, 2013 20:53:14 #
Jun 29, 2013 20:57:55 #
lighthouse
Loc: No Fixed Abode
Susan, I am very impressed indeed. Your photography skills are brilliant, your processing skills are very good, nice and subtle, and to spice it up with 3 sex images intermingled there really makes a great flickr homepage.
Thank you for reminding me to not judge what I think peoples photography is going to be like from their avatar icon thingy.
Thank you for reminding me to not judge what I think peoples photography is going to be like from their avatar icon thingy.
Coolcameragirl wrote:
If you've got lots of money to burn, go for the "L". I have the non L 100 macro and am very pleased. Check out my Flickr page for examples of macro with the non L lens. Good luck!
Jun 29, 2013 21:17:55 #
Coolcameragirl wrote:
If you've got lots of money to burn, go for the "L". I have the non L 100 macro and am very pleased. Check out my Flickr page for examples of macro with the non L lens. Good luck!
Your photos are incredible. It proves knowing how to use the equipment trumps not knowing & spending a bank roll & getting mediocre photos.
Jun 29, 2013 21:22:38 #
lighthouse wrote:
Susan, I am very impressed indeed. Your photography skills are brilliant, your processing skills are very good, nice and subtle, and to spice it up with 3 sex images intermingled there really makes a great flickr homepage.
Thank you for reminding me to not judge what I think peoples photography is going to be like from their avatar icon thingy.
Thank you for reminding me to not judge what I think peoples photography is going to be like from their avatar icon thingy.
Thanks, lighthouse. My avitar looks like a dumb blonde? Ha, ha. I have lots of sex images - I feel like a voyeur.
Jun 29, 2013 21:51:59 #
lighthouse
Loc: No Fixed Abode
No.
Not a dumb blonde. But if you can get advantage out of playing that sometime, then why not use it? LOL
Not a dumb blonde. But if you can get advantage out of playing that sometime, then why not use it? LOL
Coolcameragirl wrote:
Thanks, lighthouse. My avitar looks like a dumb blonde? Ha, ha. I have lots of sex images - I feel like a voyeur.
Jun 29, 2013 22:51:31 #
TNmike wrote:
WOW Coolcameragirl! I had never visited your flickr page before! Really nice photos and as can be seen the 100mm non L is really great, especially in your hands!! TNmike
Yes! Outstanding.
Jun 30, 2013 05:22:07 #
datsdeep wrote:
Between the two: Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro USM. or 100mm f/2.8L macro IS USM..... And why?
Image Stability. Twice as many images were good compared to the non IS version. I had the non IS and now I have the IS version.
Jun 30, 2013 06:33:21 #
Great photos. I kept going back to the bicycles scene at the Dock St. Coffee Shop, love that one.
Jun 30, 2013 07:49:51 #
Wow, CCG. I bow down to your greatness! What a beautiful portfolio - and even the sex photos! But I thought leprechauns didn't exist - but there one is in your photos! People were just looking in the wrong country! Does he make his own clothes or does his mother?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.