Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
CDC Releases Study on Gun Violence
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Jul 3, 2013 23:45:35   #
heyrob Loc: Western Washington
 
ole sarg wrote:
the more you own the more chance you have of shooting yourself or someone in your family shooting you or themselves or some poor visitor.


Sarge, when will you liberals learn that repeating a lie over and over, does not make it true. That claim has been refuted repeatedly for years, the only people you're fooling are yourself and those who share your particular erroneous beliefs.

Reply
Jul 11, 2013 00:05:48   #
Brian in Whitby Loc: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
 
RLKurth wrote:
WTH does the CDC (Center for Disease Control) have to do with gun violence? People shooting people is just wrong, but it's not a disease is it. Unless it involves bacteria or other biologicals the CDC should keep it's nose out of areas it wasn't designed to do.


I agree when will medical personnel stop trying to be experts on everything. Earning a medical degree requires a great ability to memorize. It does not mean they have learned to think.

Reply
Jul 11, 2013 09:39:59   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
heyrob wrote:
Sarge, when will you liberals learn that repeating a lie over and over, does not make it true. That claim has been refuted repeatedly for years, the only people you're fooling are yourself and those who share your particular erroneous beliefs.


not hard to fool a fool...ignore it...

Reply
 
 
Jul 11, 2013 10:37:48   #
Croce Loc: Earth
 
wilpharm wrote:
not hard to fool a fool...ignore it...


Wil, Sarge has deminished capacity to think, but has a vivid anti american imagination. He also stresses his need to carry a gun because he is a "potential high risk target". In other words he's a nut case.

Reply
Jul 11, 2013 13:04:48   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
Croce wrote:
Wil, Sarge has deminished capacity to think, but has a vivid anti american imagination. He also stresses his need to carry a gun because he is a "potential high risk target". In other words he's a nut case.


He would be a high risk target on our place..right there with possums, coyotes, armadillos, etc...

Reply
Jul 11, 2013 15:46:53   #
heyrob Loc: Western Washington
 
Croce wrote:
Wil, Sarge has deminished capacity to think, but has a vivid anti american imagination. He also stresses his need to carry a gun because he is a "potential high risk target". In other words he's a nut case.


I was unaware of his "need", so on top of everything else he's a hypocrite too. I can have my gun, but not others, typical liberal double standard.

Reply
Jul 11, 2013 16:13:35   #
Robedevl Loc: So Cal transplant to Georgia.
 
Having read the opinions posted below, it's obvious there are, and will always be, split opmions about guns. Personally, I am an advocate of ownership, for all reasons. including sport, and home protection, but to avoid entering the frey to deeply, I'll try keeping this short.
I believe the current administration last tried to pass the anti gun law on the back of the Interstate Commerce Commision, which was struck down. Now, the new ploy is to draw the Center of Disease control into the picture, with a claim that the mishandling of arms is a, hmm... epidemic?
Rather subliminal coaching, I'd say, when the only relationship between them, and guns, is if we can stretch their jurisdiction to include, or expand control of lead poisoning.

Reply
 
 
Jul 11, 2013 16:54:12   #
Croce Loc: Earth
 
heyrob wrote:
I was unaware of his "need", so on top of everything else he's a hypocrite too. I can have my gun, but not others, typical liberal double standard.


He has stated his "need" in several past posts. Claims its because he carried jewelry a lot of times. Of course I know the jewelry is valuable compared to ole sarge because he isn't worth a shit as we all know.

Reply
Jul 11, 2013 21:56:19   #
heyrob Loc: Western Washington
 
Croce wrote:
He has stated his "need" in several past posts. Claims its because he carried jewelry a lot of times. Of course I know the jewelry is valuable compared to ole sarge because he isn't worth a shit as we all know.


LMAO! Well put! :thumbup:

Reply
Jul 11, 2013 21:58:13   #
heyrob Loc: Western Washington
 
Robedevl wrote:
Having read the opinions posted below, it's obvious there are, and will always be, split opmions about guns. Personally, I am an advocate of ownership, for all reasons. including sport, and home protection, but to avoid entering the frey to deeply, I'll try keeping this short.
I believe the current administration last tried to pass the anti gun law on the back of the Interstate Commerce Commision, which was struck down. Now, the new ploy is to draw the Center of Disease control into the picture, with a claim that the mishandling of arms is a, hmm... epidemic?
Rather subliminal coaching, I'd say, when the only relationship between them, and guns, is if we can stretch their jurisdiction to include, or expand control of lead poisoning.
Having read the opinions posted below, it's obviou... (show quote)


Yes, but the ploy also backfired as it didn't come to the conclusion BHO wanted.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.