Comments will be grateful
May 25, 2013 10:52:50 #
May 25, 2013 11:00:52 #
May 25, 2013 11:13:46 #
Both great images. Love the perspective on them. Number two is my favorite.
May 25, 2013 11:37:17 #
The long exposure allowed by the ND filter is a pretty neat effect. I really like how it blurs the moving ocean which allows photo #1 to be about perspective and makes it very interesting - a shorter exposure with moving waves might just be too busy. They look like they could have been taken with a large format view camera. Very nicely done.
May 25, 2013 11:57:36 #
May 25, 2013 12:06:44 #
moggey wrote:
Hi UHG forum.
Here's 2 of my latest shots, comment will be much appreciated.
Both were taken with a Lee Big Stopper and both were 60 second exposures.
On another note, the exif data for the pier shot says on 1/30s but I know that's wrong.
These were taken with a D7100, anyone else had this issue, its not the first time I've noticed this.
Much respect Moggey
Here's 2 of my latest shots, comment will be much appreciated.
Both were taken with a Lee Big Stopper and both were 60 second exposures.
On another note, the exif data for the pier shot says on 1/30s but I know that's wrong.
These were taken with a D7100, anyone else had this issue, its not the first time I've noticed this.
Much respect Moggey
I don't see any camera exif data? David
May 25, 2013 12:36:04 #
May 25, 2013 12:53:39 #
both images are realy good, i do agree with jr1 about the light sticking above the horizon, and should be eliminated, still great shot number 2 is a excellent b&w conversion
May 25, 2013 12:54:05 #
Very nice. These are the kind of photos that keep you spellbound.
May 25, 2013 13:02:02 #
You must have had an extremely still sky on the last shot.
Hardly any cloud movement for a 60 sec exposure.
Hardly any cloud movement for a 60 sec exposure.
May 25, 2013 13:44:42 #
May 25, 2013 13:50:59 #
moggey wrote:
Hi UHG forum.
Here's 2 of my latest shots, comment will be much appreciated.
Both were taken with a Lee Big Stopper and both were 60 second exposures.
On another note, the exif data for the pier shot says on 1/30s but I know that's wrong.
These were taken with a D7100, anyone else had this issue, its not the first time I've noticed this.
Much respect Moggey
Here's 2 of my latest shots, comment will be much appreciated.
Both were taken with a Lee Big Stopper and both were 60 second exposures.
On another note, the exif data for the pier shot says on 1/30s but I know that's wrong.
These were taken with a D7100, anyone else had this issue, its not the first time I've noticed this.
Much respect Moggey
Here are two instances where the "rule of thirds" does not apply.
Bravo,bravo, bravissimo!!!!!!
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Rich
May 25, 2013 13:53:41 #
Steve M wrote:
moggey: An awesome set. When I look at the exif here, it shows as a Nikon D7100, F/16, 60 Seconds, ISO-100, 24 mm Focal length, pattern metering. At least that is what Window's 8 is seing.
Thanks for posting
Steve
Thanks for posting
Steve
Yup, showing the same in Win 7
Great ones Moggey...and Hogs, spend the 5.8 seconds on the download !
May 25, 2013 15:32:27 #
Both are beautiful!!!
moggey wrote:
Hi UHG forum.
Here's 2 of my latest shots, comment will be much appreciated.
Both were taken with a Lee Big Stopper and both were 60 second exposures.
On another note, the exif data for the pier shot says on 1/30s but I know that's wrong.
These were taken with a D7100, anyone else had this issue, its not the first time I've noticed this.
Much respect Moggey
Here's 2 of my latest shots, comment will be much appreciated.
Both were taken with a Lee Big Stopper and both were 60 second exposures.
On another note, the exif data for the pier shot says on 1/30s but I know that's wrong.
These were taken with a D7100, anyone else had this issue, its not the first time I've noticed this.
Much respect Moggey
May 25, 2013 15:57:29 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.