gym
Loc: Athens, Georgia
The spider is Oxyopes scalaris. EXCELLENT detail and sharpness!! May I ask your settings?
gym wrote:
EXCELLENT detail and sharpness!! May I ask your settings?
thanks, the usual settings are ISO 100, 1/200-sec at f/13.
gym
Loc: Athens, Georgia
I know that you use the Canon MP-E 65mm. It always has RAVE reviews because of it's image quality, and the only drawback is that most people say that a tripod or a focusing rail is mandatory. But, of course, doing insects in the field makes these accessories virtually impossible under most circumstances. I've thought seriously about getting this lens, but because I'm a 'hand-holder', I've hesitated.
Do you EVER hand-hold on these shots?
thanks man, I appreciate the vote of confidence
gym wrote:
Do you EVER hand-hold on these shots?
Most all are handheld, including the 65mm, and by hand held I mean no tripod, but I do brace against anything available thats sturdy, I use a stick for support sometimes too. The recent most useful tool for me is the Bolt CBP-C1 compact battery pack, it let's me shoot the hell out of things and recycles very quickly. I do have a rail system that I use occasionally for dead/slow moving things. The 65mm is VERY challenging but coupled with the flash pack I shoot ALOT of shots which brings my averages up considerably. Now the 100mm 2.8 L IS coupled with the new 5D is really amazing, That and I discovered my 5D mkll, lens mount was messed up from dropping it with my 24-70 on it at my nieces christmas party. It's going in for surgery, next week. It was negatively effecting the 65mm pictures as it moved around.
gym
Loc: Athens, Georgia
napabob wrote:
Now the 100mm 2.8 L IS coupled with the new 5D is really amazing, That and I discovered my 5D mkll, lens mount was messed up from dropping it with my 24-70 on it at my nieces christmas party. It's going in for surgery, next week. It was negatively effecting the 65mm pictures as it moved around.
Do you find that the quality of the images with the 100mm 2.8 IS is as good as those with the 65mm?
gym wrote:
Do you find that the quality of the images with the 100mm 2.8 IS is as good as those with the 65mm?
tough one, I think if I get the 65mm focus spot on (not easy) then it edges the 100 but not by much. The 100 on the mklll is ahead of the mkll by quite a ways, but not sure if it will after the mkll gets the mounting collar replaced(see PM)
BUT when you go past 3X on the 65mm it gets even more challenging handheld, 5X you need meds ;-)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.