Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
True Macro-Photography Forum
spider and a fly
May 23, 2013 18:03:09   #
napabob Loc: Napa CA
 
shot at 3X







Reply
May 24, 2013 14:52:02   #
gym Loc: Athens, Georgia
 
The spider is Oxyopes scalaris. EXCELLENT detail and sharpness!! May I ask your settings?

Reply
May 24, 2013 14:57:06   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Female Western Lynx spider (Oxyopes scalaris) - http://bugguide.net/node/view/15151/bgimage
Your photos are superior to 99% of images on Bug Guide.

Reply
 
 
May 24, 2013 15:04:38   #
napabob Loc: Napa CA
 
gym wrote:
EXCELLENT detail and sharpness!! May I ask your settings?
thanks, the usual settings are ISO 100, 1/200-sec at f/13.

Reply
May 24, 2013 15:18:28   #
gym Loc: Athens, Georgia
 
I know that you use the Canon MP-E 65mm. It always has RAVE reviews because of it's image quality, and the only drawback is that most people say that a tripod or a focusing rail is mandatory. But, of course, doing insects in the field makes these accessories virtually impossible under most circumstances. I've thought seriously about getting this lens, but because I'm a 'hand-holder', I've hesitated.

Do you EVER hand-hold on these shots?

Reply
May 24, 2013 16:20:27   #
napabob Loc: Napa CA
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
Female Western Lynx spider (Oxyopes scalaris) - http://bugguide.net/node/view/15151/bgimage
Your photos are superior to 99% of images on Bug Guide.
thanks man, I appreciate the vote of confidence

Reply
May 24, 2013 16:37:59   #
napabob Loc: Napa CA
 
gym wrote:
Do you EVER hand-hold on these shots?
Most all are handheld, including the 65mm, and by hand held I mean no tripod, but I do brace against anything available thats sturdy, I use a stick for support sometimes too. The recent most useful tool for me is the Bolt CBP-C1 compact battery pack, it let's me shoot the hell out of things and recycles very quickly. I do have a rail system that I use occasionally for dead/slow moving things. The 65mm is VERY challenging but coupled with the flash pack I shoot ALOT of shots which brings my averages up considerably. Now the 100mm 2.8 L IS coupled with the new 5D is really amazing, That and I discovered my 5D mkll, lens mount was messed up from dropping it with my 24-70 on it at my nieces christmas party. It's going in for surgery, next week. It was negatively effecting the 65mm pictures as it moved around.

Reply
 
 
May 24, 2013 16:46:39   #
gym Loc: Athens, Georgia
 
napabob wrote:
Now the 100mm 2.8 L IS coupled with the new 5D is really amazing, That and I discovered my 5D mkll, lens mount was messed up from dropping it with my 24-70 on it at my nieces christmas party. It's going in for surgery, next week. It was negatively effecting the 65mm pictures as it moved around.


Do you find that the quality of the images with the 100mm 2.8 IS is as good as those with the 65mm?

Reply
May 24, 2013 17:00:38   #
napabob Loc: Napa CA
 
gym wrote:
Do you find that the quality of the images with the 100mm 2.8 IS is as good as those with the 65mm?
tough one, I think if I get the 65mm focus spot on (not easy) then it edges the 100 but not by much. The 100 on the mklll is ahead of the mkll by quite a ways, but not sure if it will after the mkll gets the mounting collar replaced(see PM)

BUT when you go past 3X on the 65mm it gets even more challenging handheld, 5X you need meds ;-)

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
True Macro-Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.