Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Kodak T-Max & Tri-X
Nov 18, 2011 20:57:34   #
photosbyhenry Loc: Apple Valley MN
 
First photo is the b&w mode
2nd T-Max
3rd Tri-X

The bottom two are the comparision of the old Kodak b&w films
The bottom two are the comparision of the old Koda...

T-Max
T-Max...

Tri-X
Tri-X...

Reply
Nov 19, 2011 07:30:30   #
Rhino
 
Good example here of the difference. I like your subject used to demonstrate it. Very nice!

Reply
Nov 19, 2011 07:32:09   #
Rhino
 
I actually like t-max better than tri-x which is suprising.

Reply
 
 
Nov 19, 2011 07:37:51   #
tkhphotography Loc: Gresham, Or, not Seattle
 
Rhino wrote:
I actually like t-max better than tri-x which is suprising.


My problem with T-Max was you couldn't push it as much as I used to with Tri-X.

Shot a lot of basketball games in the old Memorial Coliseum at ASA 1600 and develop 1 more minute with a little more agitation than normal.

Reply
Nov 19, 2011 10:57:45   #
ricoche
 
some time b&w shots are better. until [ if ]i can get a digital slr,i will use up lots of film with my 40 y/o pentax k 1000 and my cannon ae1. nice being able to get pics and cds.

Reply
Nov 20, 2011 09:33:15   #
photosbyhenry Loc: Apple Valley MN
 
I'll have to brush the dust of my old Pentax ME some day.

Reply
Nov 20, 2011 19:43:47   #
William Loc: Mississippi
 
The news about films higher resolution is not such a big
deal as only a slow ASA with careful processing can yeild
the high end results. Digital at even 5MG is better than
most of the film that I shot for over 40 years, unless it's
large format there's no way I'll ever shoot film, unless
there's a darn good reason. (THOUGHTS) let's hear them please?

Low Light, looks good to me
Low Light, looks good to me...

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.