Update on "Is Digital Manipulation An Enhancement or Does It Contaminate An Original Image ?"
May 9, 2013 06:34:18 #
I know that digital art has its place and that Photoshop is the leading culprit, but the link I'm about to show you is so fascinating. This guy takes most of his photos but some times he uses stock photos. The older audiences may want to turn the sound down a little and the younger turn it up.
Check it out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbqY9h_nUvM
Check out some of his other video's
Check it out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbqY9h_nUvM
Check out some of his other video's
May 10, 2013 06:45:35 #
May 10, 2013 15:17:34 #
dwightdills wrote:
I know that digital art has its place and that Photoshop is the leading culprit, but the link I'm about to show you is so fascinating. This guy takes most of his photos but some times he uses stock photos. The older audiences may want to turn the sound down a little and the younger turn it up.
Check it out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbqY9h_nUvM
Check out some of his other video's
Check it out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbqY9h_nUvM
Check out some of his other video's
Guess because this is fantasy and I am not into fantasy it's not impressive at all, just a time lapse video. As far as contaminating a picture there again it would depend more on a persons likes and dislikes.
I personally take a lot of my own pictures but also use stock images in my work. Had a chance to attend a gallery opening in New Orleans and the artist/owner explained the differences between photographers and Photo-Illustrators, knowing this I would say that Digital Manipulation is an art just as photography is an art.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.