Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lenses in relation to sensors
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 8, 2013 12:47:27   #
lindmike
 
If I take a shot with a Canon L lense (full frame lense) with a full frame sensor and the same shot with the same lense with an APS-C sensor, what will be the difference in the shots.

Reply
May 8, 2013 12:51:33   #
PhotoArtsLA Loc: Boynton Beach
 
The smaller sensor will make the full frame lens become a bit more telephoto, a 50mm becoming, effectively, a 75mm or in that vicinity. 1.5x and 1.6x and even 3x multiplication factors have been mentioned lately. Can't wait to try out my 900mm f/2.8 when my Pocket Cinema Camera arrives.

Reply
May 8, 2013 21:34:20   #
wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
One thing you may gain - if the lens is soft on the edges the softnes will be croped out in the crop camera. L lenses may not be soft anywhere. - Dave

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2013 22:03:29   #
FredB Loc: A little below the Mason-Dixon line.
 
lindmike wrote:
If I take a shot with a Canon L lense (full frame lense) with a full frame sensor and the same shot with the same lense with an APS-C sensor, what will be the difference in the shots.
The shot taken with the smaller sensor will not have the same amount of visual "coverage" as the one with the larger sensor. Whether it's an L lens or not makes no difference. It's simple. Make a circle with your fingers around the palm of one hand. Look through the circle made by your thumb and forefinger. Now make a 'tighter' circle. Look through again. Ta-da! Big sensor - little sensor. That's all. Forget about the mumbo jumbo about 1.6 magnification or zoom or field of view. A smaller sensor captures less of the world than a larger sensor.

Reply
May 8, 2013 23:19:07   #
lindmike
 
Great example. Makes it very simple

Reply
May 9, 2013 00:54:48   #
JPL
 
Yes, a smaller sensor captures part of the picture a full frame sensor would capture with the same lens, thats it. There is no magnification, the lens is not working differently because it has a different sensor behind it.

Reply
May 9, 2013 10:42:34   #
huskyrider705 Loc: Phenix City, Alabama
 
lindmike wrote:
If I take a shot with a Canon L lense (full frame lense) with a full frame sensor and the same shot with the same lense with an APS-C sensor, what will be the difference in the shots.


Look in this issue below in Photo Analysis, 6D vs 7D and you can see on the original shots the different image size in full frame and crop sensor. It was not an L lens but the same results just the same.

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2013 10:56:55   #
WAL
 
It’s interesting how often this question appears. The concept is not new. If you went back to the 1930’”s there were 2 ¼ cameras that had adapters to use 35 mm film. The cameras had fixed lenses so the image on the 35 mm film was smaller. What was lost was the periphery.
It was also common to cut (punches where available) the 2 ¼ film to 24x36 mm to use in slide projectors.
Going further back the view camera would have backs extra backs that used differing sizes of film. The effect was pretty much the same.

Hasselblad film camera backs also can be used to take reduced sized negative on 120 film.

Where photographers as confused then as now?

Reply
May 9, 2013 11:49:51   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
lindmike wrote:
If I take a shot with a Canon L lense (full frame lense) with a full frame sensor and the same shot with the same lense with an APS-C sensor, what will be the difference in the shots.


The image captured by the APS-C sensor camera body will appear 60% larger (closer) than an image captured by the full frame sensor body.

Reply
May 9, 2013 12:19:46   #
Jer Loc: Mesa, Arizona
 
I agree, this is the best explanation of this concept I've every seen.


FredB wrote:
The shot taken with the smaller sensor will not have the same amount of visual "coverage" as the one with the larger sensor. Whether it's an L lens or not makes no difference. It's simple. Make a circle with your fingers around the palm of one hand. Look through the circle made by your thumb and forefinger. Now make a 'tighter' circle. Look through again. Ta-da! Big sensor - little sensor. That's all. Forget about the mumbo jumbo about 1.6 magnification or zoom or field of view. A smaller sensor captures less of the world than a larger sensor.
The shot taken with the smaller sensor will not ha... (show quote)

Reply
May 9, 2013 16:26:36   #
FredB Loc: A little below the Mason-Dixon line.
 
jeep_daddy wrote:
The image captured by the APS-C sensor camera body will appear 60% larger (closer) than an image captured by the full frame sensor body.
Now see, that's really not true. The image is not larger, nor are things magnified. The SIZE of the area captured is less, that is all. Go back to my first example with the hand telescope that we all did as kids. That's all a smaller sensor means, in the long run.

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2013 16:44:25   #
Jblanke Loc: Metairie, LA
 
JPL wrote:
Yes, a smaller sensor captures part of the picture a full frame sensor would capture with the same lens, thats it. There is no magnification, the lens is not working differently because it has a different sensor behind it.


However, the subject will occupy more of the image field creating "apparent magnification."

Reply
May 9, 2013 16:58:48   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
Jblanke wrote:
However, the subject will occupy more of the image field creating "apparent magnification."


Yep, in the end you do get a magnified image/print.
Take ( and these are relatively old examples) the Nikon D300 (DX) and the D700 (FX). Both are 12 MP cameras. Put a 200 mm lens on the D300 and a 300mm on the D700 and shoot the same scene from the same vantage point at the same setting. Make an 8 x 12 inch print of each. Other than the D300 sample having a bit more depth of field, they will look almost identical. Put the 200mm lens on both cameras and the D300 image will look 1.5x closer.

Reply
May 9, 2013 17:17:35   #
JPL
 
You can also get the same magnifying effect by cropping the full frame picture, no need for another camera to do that.

Reply
May 9, 2013 17:25:56   #
Jblanke Loc: Metairie, LA
 
JPL wrote:
You can also get the same magnifying effect by cropping the full frame picture, no need for another camera to do that.


Although..........I can crop away at shots from my 5d MK II all day long and get better results than cropping shots from my 40D, which is a 1.6 crop sensor. Then again, the 5d MK II is also a 20+ MP sensor......and that has a ton to do with it. When I attempt to squeeze out a distant shot from the 40d by cropping, I usually get a lot'a noise.........especially in a low light shot. That is why, one day, I gotta find a way to get a 5D MK III. I love shooting full frame.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.