Inch worm
Apr 30, 2013 19:16:27 #
Found this guy today, so I thought I would practice on him as he was moving very slow. No PP other than crop on #2.
C&C Please.
C&C Please.
1
2
Apr 30, 2013 19:43:01 #
Apr 30, 2013 20:06:12 #
Sharkdiver wrote:
Terrific,, they are tiny little guys, love the first shot,,,
thanks for your comment.
Apr 30, 2013 20:26:35 #
Neither image has good focus.
For available low light, ISO 200 is too low; for hand-held 100-mm macro lens, 1/80-sec is too long; for resolution purposes, f/32 is too small (the resultant Small Aperture Diffraction probably caused loss of fine resolution).
I suggest ISO 400, f/16, and the appropriate shutter duration for proper exposure.
This will be a good read for you:
FAQ: Why are my Digital Images Sharper at f/8 than f/22?
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-59819-1.html
For available low light, ISO 200 is too low; for hand-held 100-mm macro lens, 1/80-sec is too long; for resolution purposes, f/32 is too small (the resultant Small Aperture Diffraction probably caused loss of fine resolution).
I suggest ISO 400, f/16, and the appropriate shutter duration for proper exposure.
This will be a good read for you:
FAQ: Why are my Digital Images Sharper at f/8 than f/22?
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-59819-1.html
Apr 30, 2013 20:28:33 #
I'd try a vertical orientation and get closer. Do you have access to extension tubes?
Apr 30, 2013 20:44:13 #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Thanks Nikonian, this is the kind of feed back that I need. One correction with due respect however, I used a flash with a homemade diffuser/ modifier. Again thank you for you constructive criticism, it will really help me improve.Neither image has good focus.
For available low light, ISO 200 is too low; for hand-held 100-mm macro lens, 1/80-sec is too long; for resolution purposes, f/32 is too small (the resultant Small Aperture Diffraction probably caused loss of fine resolution).
I suggest ISO 400, f/16, and the appropriate shutter duration for proper exposure.
This will be a good read for you:
FAQ: Why are my Digital Images Sharper at f/8 than f/22?
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-59819-1.html
For available low light, ISO 200 is too low; for hand-held 100-mm macro lens, 1/80-sec is too long; for resolution purposes, f/32 is too small (the resultant Small Aperture Diffraction probably caused loss of fine resolution).
I suggest ISO 400, f/16, and the appropriate shutter duration for proper exposure.
This will be a good read for you:
FAQ: Why are my Digital Images Sharper at f/8 than f/22?
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-59819-1.html
Apr 30, 2013 20:47:26 #
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
Thanks for your comments. Right now I am limited to a 100mm macro. I can't imagine using tubes hand held with that lens. Thanks again.I'd try a vertical orientation and get closer. Do you have access to extension tubes?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.