Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Please critique black and white
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Apr 30, 2013 15:08:00   #
tk Loc: Iowa
 
Here is a black and white I have been working on. Please let me know what I should change or do differently to improve it.



Reply
Apr 30, 2013 15:18:24   #
Turbo Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
I might crop it in 16 / 9 format ( as the bottom part does not provide any more info ) and try to bring more details out of the duck.

Reply
Apr 30, 2013 15:23:35   #
Turbo Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
tk wrote:
Here is a black and white I have been working on. Please let me know what I should change or do differently to improve it.


Crop and Shadow/highlight on that one



Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2013 15:30:56   #
angler Loc: StHelens England
 
I like what Turbos done to it tk but to be honest i'd like to see the original,this looks a bit dark for me.Hope your not offended.

Reply
Apr 30, 2013 15:32:48   #
Kingmapix Loc: Mesa, Arizona
 
I would like to see the duck more clearly.

Reply
Apr 30, 2013 15:43:21   #
GHK Loc: The Vale of Eden
 
tk wrote:
Here is a black and white I have been working on. Please let me know what I should change or do differently to improve it.


The histogram shows clear signs that you have made adjustments to the tonality of the image. (I trust that these went in the right direction.)
As the image now stands, the shadow levels, although they just manage to register in the digital file, are too low to be separated by the monitor. They are showing at just tone 1 and I suggest that they should be raised to about 16.
The highlights are far too dark, registering at 196, and I would raise them to 250.
Finally an S curve, pushing up the 200 input about 5 points, and dropping the 20 input very slighly will give a small increase in contrast across the main tonality range and give the image a bit more impact.
All adjustments made using Curves.
GHK



Reply
Apr 30, 2013 15:57:25   #
tk Loc: Iowa
 
Here is the original. Only thing done was cropping and changed in LR4 to B&W.
Wow, thanks for all the great responses! Really appreciate it. I'll let you folks critique this and then we'll go from there.

I like the suggestions. Last adjustment came out a lot better.



With more in the shadow/highlight critique.
With more in the shadow/highlight critique....

Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2013 16:03:52   #
tk Loc: Iowa
 
GHK wrote:
The histogram shows clear signs that you have made adjustments to the tonality of the image. (I trust that these went in the right direction.)
As the image now stands, the shadow levels, although they just manage to register in the digital file, are too low to be separated by the monitor. They are showing at just tone 1 and I suggest that they should be raised to about 16.
The highlights are far too dark, registering at 196, and I would raise them to 250.
Finally an S curve, pushing up the 200 input about 5 points, and dropping the 20 input very slighly will give a small increase in contrast across the main tonality range and give the image a bit more impact.
All adjustments made using Curves.
GHK
The histogram shows clear signs that you have made... (show quote)


Really like your changes. Hope I can duplicate them.

Reply
Apr 30, 2013 16:07:37   #
Turbo Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
There you go ! curves, exposure, shadows/highlights are very useful tools

Reply
Apr 30, 2013 16:07:58   #
angler Loc: StHelens England
 
That looks better tk,it's not as busy at the bottom of the photo, it makes me think of dusk.

Reply
Apr 30, 2013 16:09:08   #
tk Loc: Iowa
 
Turbo wrote:
There you go ! curves, exposure, shadows/highlights are very useful tools


Thank you! There's the ol' UHH giving great pointers! Very much appreciate your time and trouble to help me!

Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2013 16:09:48   #
tk Loc: Iowa
 
angler wrote:
That looks better tk,it's not as busy at the bottom of the photo, it makes me think of dusk.


Thank you Angler! Always appreciate your help! Wouldn't be here without great people giving great advice!

Reply
Apr 30, 2013 16:21:45   #
gregoryd45 Loc: Fakahatchee Strand
 
tk wrote:
Here is the original. Only thing done was cropping and changed in LR4 to B&W.
Wow, thanks for all the great responses! Really appreciate it. I'll let you folks critique this and then we'll go from there.

I like the suggestions. Last adjustment came out a lot better.


I like the adjustment you did tk, the first you posted seemed dark with not enough contrast, and the duck, grebe ? seemed to be lost. Keep up the creativity.

Reply
Apr 30, 2013 16:26:35   #
tk Loc: Iowa
 
gregoryd45 wrote:
I like the adjustment you did tk, the first you posted seemed dark with not enough contrast, and the duck, grebe ? seemed to be lost. Keep up the creativity.


Thank you Gregory! UHH is the best place to learn and get better. Glad to be here.

Reply
Apr 30, 2013 16:59:15   #
Aldebaran Loc: Florida
 
I took the liberty of playing with it, but I don't know if there is a lot of difference. I think the esthetic element is the reflection of the trees.

Clearer?
Clearer?...

A clear crop
A clear crop...

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.