Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
lenscoat covers
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 26, 2013 12:18:16   #
oldtool2 Loc: South Jersey
 
Does anyone use these covers? I have been looking at them for added protection for my Sigma 500mm and my Sigma 120-300mm lenses. I can see where they might add good protection on a rainy day but they are a little expnsive. My question is, how well do they work and are they worth the cost?

Jim D

Reply
Apr 26, 2013 13:42:04   #
JR1 Loc: Tavistock, Devon, UK
 
What ones, I use these

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/waterproof-Camera-and-Lens-rain-cover-fits-Canon-400-400mm-f5-6-in-5-colours-/121034291122?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item1c2e34b7b2


Different sizes different prices

Fits in a second, can be a little fiddly NOTE the elastic ends do not work on petal lens hoods

Reply
Apr 26, 2013 15:05:14   #
oldtool2 Loc: South Jersey
 
JR1 wrote:
What ones, I use these

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/waterproof-Camera-and-Lens-rain-cover-fits-Canon-400-400mm-f5-6-in-5-colours-/121034291122?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item1c2e34b7b2


Different sizes different prices

Fits in a second, can be a little fiddly NOTE the elastic ends do not work on petal lens hoods


I use something simular. They are like a large baggie that you can slip your hand in one end and it has a draw sting that tightenes on the hood. I always have one with me in case it rains, but that is all it is, a rain cover.

What I am asking about are "Lenscoat Covers". Here is a link to one of them.

http://www.adorama.com/LCS50045CAM.html

This would go on the lens and stay there.

Jim D

Reply
 
 
Apr 26, 2013 23:35:31   #
robert-photos Loc: Chicago
 
oldtool2 wrote:
Does anyone use these covers? I have been looking at them for added protection for my Sigma 500mm and my Sigma 120-300mm lenses. I can see where they might add good protection on a rainy day but they are a little expnsive. My question is, how well do they work and are they worth the cost?

Jim D


I have one on my Sigma 120-300mm. I put it on because of Sigma's poor rep for paint duribility. I haven't been disappointed.

They give you finish protection but I wouldn't depend on them for weather protection.

Reply
Apr 27, 2013 03:42:17   #
JR1 Loc: Tavistock, Devon, UK
 
oldtool2 wrote:
I use something simular. They are like a large baggie that you can slip your hand in one end and it has a draw sting that tightenes on the hood. I always have one with me in case it rains, but that is all it is, a rain cover.

What I am asking about are "Lenscoat Covers". Here is a link to one of them.

http://www.adorama.com/LCS50045CAM.html

This would go on the lens and stay there.

Jim D


That is what I was also wondering about, I have always looked at these, I have no idea how they fit/work, can they be used on zooms, I doubt it.

Reply
Apr 27, 2013 08:32:22   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
oldtool2 wrote:
Does anyone use these covers? I have been looking at them for added protection for my Sigma 500mm and my Sigma 120-300mm lenses. I can see where they might add good protection on a rainy day but they are a little expnsive. My question is, how well do they work and are they worth the cost?

Jim D

Neoprene and custom made for each lens! For someone who uses lenses "in the field" very often, a cover like this could offer good protection. My main concern, aside from cost, would be the bulkiness. If you plan to resell the lens later, it would be a good selling point.

Reply
Apr 27, 2013 08:35:47   #
Festus Loc: North Dakota
 
oldtool2 wrote:
Does anyone use these covers? I have been looking at them for added protection for my Sigma 500mm and my Sigma 120-300mm lenses. I can see where they might add good protection on a rainy day but they are a little expnsive. My question is, how well do they work and are they worth the cost?

Jim D


I use Lenscoat covers on my longer, heavier lenses. 200 f/2, 300 f/4 and 400 f/2.8. Love them, they give great protection. They help prevent the common nicks and scuffs that can occur on lenses over time. I think the $70 to $90 investment in a Lenscoat will be returned down the road if and when you may want to sell the lens.

Reply
 
 
Apr 27, 2013 08:48:06   #
oldtool2 Loc: South Jersey
 
They advertise waterproof. Do they really protect the lens in the rain and keep it dry?

Jim D

Reply
Apr 27, 2013 08:51:22   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
oldtool2 wrote:
They advertise waterproof. Do they really protect the lens in the rain and keep it dry?

Jim D

Interesting. Wetsuits are made from neoprene, and they're not waterproof. If they say they're waterproof, they probably are, except for those big holes they have cut for the lens controls.

Reply
Apr 27, 2013 09:06:51   #
oldtool2 Loc: South Jersey
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Interesting. Wetsuits are made from neoprene, and they're not waterproof. If they say they're waterproof, they probably are, except for those big holes they have cut for the lens controls.


Jerry,

No hole for controls, they use a clear material over the switches and such.

Jim D

Reply
Apr 27, 2013 09:09:36   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
oldtool2 wrote:
Jerry,

No hole for controls, they use a clear material over the switches and such.

Jim D


Ah, that makes sense. If I left the house more often, I might be tempted to get one. :D

Reply
 
 
Apr 27, 2013 09:10:14   #
Festus Loc: North Dakota
 
oldtool2 wrote:
They advertise waterproof. Do they really protect the lens in the rain and keep it dry?

Jim D


The Lenscoat itself is not waterproof. They sell a "Raincoat" for that purpose.

Reply
Apr 27, 2013 10:48:30   #
Outdoorsafe Loc: Colorado Springs
 
I use them on all of my longer lenses and more expensive lenses. They are a finicky to put on but once in place they stay in place. I do a lot of work from a blind. With Lens Coats on they are also quieter. If I bump the lens the neoprene absorbs the bump with no noise.

Reply
Apr 27, 2013 11:12:32   #
oldtool2 Loc: South Jersey
 
Festus wrote:
The Lenscoat itself is not waterproof. They sell a "Raincoat" for that purpose.


Not according to the advertisement.

Jim D

Reply
Apr 27, 2013 13:36:45   #
keithmac Loc: Nanaimo, B.C. Canada
 
Lenscoats themselves are not waterproof because they don't cover the complete lens. They are there for protection from bumps and bangs or in some cases for camo. I use them on all my lenses that I use in the field including zoom lenses. To the OP I have a 500mm Sigma that I have had on it since I got it and there is not a mark on the lens, I wouldn't be with out them. They also work very well on lenses that have shiny finish or white finish to cut down on reflections and glare that can affect wildlife that you are trying to photograph.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.