Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Bridge and DSLR Comparison Images?
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Apr 14, 2013 12:02:54   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
This came up in another thread, so I am making a separate post here.

Can someone post comparable photos here, one taken with a DSLR and one taken with a good bridge camera? See if we can tell which is which.

Reply
Apr 14, 2013 12:09:09   #
RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida
 
jerryc41 wrote:
This came up in another thread, so I am making a separate post here.

Can someone post comparable photos here, one taken with a DSLR and one taken with a good bridge camera? See if we can tell which is which.


I guess the subject should be the same to make an accurate comparison. Bridge cameras have limitations as most do not go beyond f8 in aperture and their sensors are smaller resulting in limitations in print size. Then there is the basic sharpness and contrast differences between the lenses.

Reply
Apr 14, 2013 12:11:36   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
RixPix wrote:
I guess the subject should be the same to make an accurate comparison. Bridge cameras have limitations as most do not go beyond f8 in aperture and their sensors are smaller resulting in limitations in print size. Then there is the basic sharpness and contrast differences between the lenses.

Right. I'm not going to rush into town and buy a bridge just to do the comparison, but it would be interesting to see two similar images and try to tell which is which.

Reply
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Apr 14, 2013 13:09:47   #
Ched49 Loc: Pittsburgh, Pa.
 
Let me be the first.





Reply
Apr 14, 2013 13:25:19   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
cjkorb wrote:
Let me be the first.

I'm going to say that the second one was taken with a DSLR. What cameras did you use, in alphabetical order - so as not to suggest which took which picture?

Reply
Apr 14, 2013 13:29:06   #
BigDaddy Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
 
jerryc41 wrote:
This came up in another thread, so I am making a separate post here.

Can someone post comparable photos here, one taken with a DSLR and one taken with a good bridge camera? See if we can tell which is which.


I have a bridge camera and before that I had one of the early digitals. The early Kodak was 2 megapixel, the bridge is 8. My experience was both cameras could take unbelievably good pictures, but, everything had to be perfect. The difference was how often everything was perfect. The newer camera has a much higher percentage of great shots. I could post pictures from my cell phone that are pretty good, and pictures from my much better bridge that are pretty bad.

I would expect with a better DSLR the odds are better, or the margin of error is better, for someone like me. My point is the best pictures on my bridge camera might compare very well to pictures taken on my brothers DSLR, but I have to take a lot more pictures to get a great picture. I would not want to post my best picture from my bridge, and have everyone run out and buy that camera thinking all the pictures would turn out that (technically) good.

One of the things that perplexes me is if my camera is capable of spectacular sharpness, clarity, focus, color and so on, why can't I get that with ALL my pictures? I had that same feeling with my old digital, and my slr's before that.

Bottom line to me is lab comparisons are one thing, best pictures another, and average picture yet another.

Here are 3 pictures, one from my Kodak DC280, one from my Panasonic and one from my cell phone. Not one of these pictures represent the quality of the average pictures these rigs take. No PP other than cropping and resizing, and also saved for the web at 72ppi and probably 40% quality.

dc280
dc280...

Pano FZ18 Bridge
Pano FZ18 Bridge...

LG Cell Phone
LG Cell Phone...

Reply
Apr 14, 2013 13:41:49   #
RaydancePhoto
 
jerryc41 wrote:
This came up in another thread, so I am making a separate post here.

Can someone post comparable photos here, one taken with a DSLR and one taken with a good bridge camera? See if we can tell which is which.


Not a great scene, just stepped out the door and took 2 shots. Used a Sony A57 and a bridge RX-100. I set both cameras to F/10 and ISO 1600 SS did vary between the 2.





Reply
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Apr 14, 2013 13:52:43   #
Ched49 Loc: Pittsburgh, Pa.
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I'm going to say that the second one was taken with a DSLR. What cameras did you use, in alphabetical order - so as not to suggest which took which picture?
One was taken with a Nikon D3100 and the other with a Nikon L110.

Reply
Apr 14, 2013 16:01:41   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
RaydancePhoto wrote:
Not a great scene, just stepped out the door and took 2 shots. Used a Sony A57 and a bridge RX-100. I set both cameras to F/10 and ISO 1600 SS did vary between the 2.

I prefer the first shot.

Reply
Apr 14, 2013 16:35:04   #
RaydancePhoto
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I prefer the first shot.


I do as well. Quite a difference in the white balance between the 2 cameras.

Reply
Apr 14, 2013 17:18:01   #
RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida
 
RaydancePhoto wrote:
I do as well. Quite a difference in the white balance between the 2 cameras.


Is it me? Neither look sharp to me.

Reply
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Apr 15, 2013 06:30:19   #
dragonfist Loc: Stafford, N.Y.
 
RixPix wrote:
Is it me? Neither look sharp to me.


I agree.

Reply
Apr 15, 2013 10:23:14   #
amyinsparta Loc: White county, TN
 
BigDaddy wrote:
I have a bridge camera and before that I had one of the early digitals. The early Kodak was 2 megapixel, the bridge is 8. My experience was both cameras could take unbelievably good pictures, but, everything had to be perfect. The difference was how often everything was perfect. The newer camera has a much higher percentage of great shots. I could post pictures from my cell phone that are pretty good, and pictures from my much better bridge that are pretty bad.

I would expect with a better DSLR the odds are better, or the margin of error is better, for someone like me. My point is the best pictures on my bridge camera might compare very well to pictures taken on my brothers DSLR, but I have to take a lot more pictures to get a great picture. I would not want to post my best picture from my bridge, and have everyone run out and buy that camera thinking all the pictures would turn out that (technically) good.

One of the things that perplexes me is if my camera is capable of spectacular sharpness, clarity, focus, color and so on, why can't I get that with ALL my pictures? I had that same feeling with my old digital, and my slr's before that.

Bottom line to me is lab comparisons are one thing, best pictures another, and average picture yet another.

Here are 3 pictures, one from my Kodak DC280, one from my Panasonic and one from my cell phone. Not one of these pictures represent the quality of the average pictures these rigs take. No PP other than cropping and resizing, and also saved for the web at 72ppi and probably 40% quality.
I have a bridge camera and before that I had one o... (show quote)


It appears, from your shots, that it is much more the photographer than it is the camera or lens. jmo

Reply
Apr 15, 2013 11:53:38   #
GeneS Loc: Glendale,AZ
 
I prefer the color in the first shot, but check out the fencing next to the dish antenna. It has much more detail in the second shot. Could be focus

Reply
Apr 15, 2013 17:31:24   #
cameranut Loc: North Carolina
 
jerryc41 wrote:
This came up in another thread, so I am making a separate post here.

Can someone post comparable photos here, one taken with a DSLR and one taken with a good bridge camera? See if we can tell which is which.


You raise an interesting subject for doing a carefully planed test, which I was thinking of doing for curiosity sake. I want to conduct a test with both bridge & dslr at the exact same settings, at the exact same time of day & exact same lighting, distance, etc. & see how much variation occurs. I'll vary the lens using the kit lens as well as a 40mm. 2.8 pancake lens on the dslr. I'll post them with no pp. I'll try to get everything matched up as closely as possible. Both comparisons will be jpegs since the bridge does not have Raw capabilities. The bridge is a 12.1mp. & the dslr is 18mp. but it should be fun to try. Raining now, but as soon as it clears will give it a go.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.