G Brown wrote:
seems funny seeing Americans objecting to someone with a weapon. Can't be 'foreigner with a weapon' that would be unconstitutional. There is no oil there so its not presumptuousness. Can't be because he's an idiot: the world is full of those. Maybe its because he might actually use it on US soil if America were to invade.
IF America were to invade as you say, There wouldn't be enough of left of N. Korea to deploy ANY weapons to the United States. The sad part would be damage done to surrounding areas, A surgical strike on the other hand would not accomplish the desired result. Seems like I remember hearing something about another little skirmish they called the Revolutionary War back in the late 1700's. Only difference we had a president with Balls during that one.
I know - he needs to shape the nuke like a gun, then we can pass a law that he has to have a background check to have it. But of course he has no police record here, and his mental state can't be verified (you know privacy) - so maybe he would be allowed to have it!hummmmm
ajmenadumdum= the evil bastard from Iran. There you made me name him for what he is.
spinkick wrote:
ajmenadumdum= the evil bastard from Iran. There you made me name him for what he is.
I figured that that was what you were trying to say but wasn't sure. Just never saw his name spelled that way.
In case your interested it is spelled Ahmadinejad.
G Brown
Loc: Sunny Bognor Regis West Sussex UK
UP-2-IT wrote:
Before you start assuming anything or start making snide remarks suggest you get a bit more current on what is happening. Guess you entirely forgot about the Faulklin Island incident.
Falkland Island war: was that another war that the us won? Can't remember you being there. Granada: now that was an island incident. Cuba that was an island incident too. Seem to think the US was there. But, the Brits were not.
wasn't a snide remark, it was simply a point of view. Some in the US want to keep their rights to bear arms but don't like others who do. As for threats, well suggest taking guns off Americans and all and sundry seem to start threatening. Is pointing a gun at someone not a threat. It just strikes me as odd logic.
I don't know how many people get killed in the US by guns. Quite a few in the UK do and we don't have the right to bear arms. If you can sweet talk a magistrate you could get a shot gun licence but it seems easier to kill people in this country with a kitchen knife or an automobile.
We have had threats of long range rockets from both Iran (they were never found) and Iraq (they have got them) but we can't invade Iraq till Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran settle down and folks in both our countries forget. Putting N Korea on our hit list will just have to wait. Seems there are lots of countries that dislike the west. We can't keep blaming Russia for stirring up trouble, nor China it seems. Maybe its just us...(as in you and I not USA)
If we didn't sell so many armaments fewer would end up being pointed back at us of whatever size. If the media stopped publishing signs of doom we would 'threaten' less on world wide TV and feel less threatened in our own homes.
There will be those who say "get your head out of the sand". maybe we should just keep out of the sand all together. Does anyone threaten the Swiss or Canada or Belgium or Holland or...the list of seemingly non threatening countries is quite large. Perhaps its time that we joined that club rather than the one we both seem to be in now.
UP-2-IT wrote:
I figured that that was what you were trying to say but wasn't sure. Just never saw his name spelled that way.
In case your interested it is spelled Ahmadinejad.
I am well aware how to spell the name. He is not worth the dignity of it being spelled correctly. i was trying to be polite and not call him for the spawn of satan that he is.
G Brown wrote:
Falkland Island war: was that another war that the us won? Can't remember you being there. Granada: now that was an island incident. Cuba that was an island incident too. Seem to think the US was there. But, the Brits were not.
wasn't a snide remark, it was simply a point of view. Some in the US want to keep their rights to bear arms but don't like others who do. As for threats, well suggest taking guns off Americans and all and sundry seem to start threatening. Is pointing a gun at someone not a threat. It just strikes me as odd logic.
I don't know how many people get killed in the US by guns. Quite a few in the UK do and we don't have the right to bear arms. If you can sweet talk a magistrate you could get a shot gun licence but it seems easier to kill people in this country with a kitchen knife or an automobile.
We have had threats of long range rockets from both Iran (they were never found) and Iraq (they have got them) but we can't invade Iraq till Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran settle down and folks in both our countries forget. Putting N Korea on our hit list will just have to wait. Seems there are lots of countries that dislike the west. We can't keep blaming Russia for stirring up trouble, nor China it seems. Maybe its just us...(as in you and I not USA)
If we didn't sell so many armaments fewer would end up being pointed back at us of whatever size. If the media stopped publishing signs of doom we would 'threaten' less on world wide TV and feel less threatened in our own homes.
There will be those who say "get your head out of the sand". maybe we should just keep out of the sand all together. Does anyone threaten the Swiss or Canada or Belgium or Holland or...the list of seemingly non threatening countries is quite large. Perhaps its time that we joined that club rather than the one we both seem to be in now.
Falkland Island war: was that another war that the... (
show quote)
Judging from your statement here sounds like your are simply pissed with everyone, thats your privledge. Even tho Kim Jong-Un, sounds like a goat bell ringing, has chosen to pointedly promise to turn the US to dust I don't honestly take him serious as the only way he could do that would be to get into kis Kia and drive over here.
All he is doing is trying to make himself look capable to the old line officers who are really in charge. i think deep down he realizes that any actuall strike against his neighbors would be the start and end of the worst day of his miserable existance.
It isn't just your country and mine involved in this arms situation you seem to find so deplorable. We are not the only countries capable of developing nuclear weapons.
There are many different organizations that exist to control the development and spread of nuclear weapons. To name a few, AIEA, OPCW, CTBTO, CD, UNDIR, UNSCOM to name a few. The problem is that a few like North korea and Iran refuse to join. These result of these rogue nations refusing to follow the established guidlines are the problem.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.