Is There Any Interest In A Deal Or Will It Be Obstruction For The Sake Of Obstruction?
Apr 5, 2013 11:43:32 #
Apr 5, 2013 13:54:39 #
I'd be very surprised if the Republican House did anything but obstruct progress.
Apr 6, 2013 09:06:52 #
Frank T wrote:
I'd be very surprised if the Republican House did anything but obstruct progress.
The House has presented several budgets that involved serious spending cuts. The Senate and the President have rejected them all. The Presidnet has stated that he will veto any budget involving budget cuts. How does that demonstrate Republican obstructionism?
Apr 6, 2013 09:12:20 #
ted45 wrote:
The House has presented several budgets that involved serious spending cuts. The Senate and the President have rejected them all. The Presidnet has stated that he will veto any budget involving budget cuts. How does that demonstrate Republican obstructionism?
Liberals only see BO's side of things.
Apr 6, 2013 10:22:36 #
Frank T wrote:
I'd be very surprised if the Republican House did anything but obstruct progress.
It's funny how each side thinks that the other is the one who won't compromise and the other side is the one who obstructs progress.
Apr 6, 2013 11:00:19 #
Its called do as i say not as i do and is true to politicians the world over
Apr 6, 2013 11:01:39 #
Captryan
Loc: Massachusetts
The House republicans already compromised, they agreed to $1 trillion new revenues on Jan 1. vs ZERO budget cuts. Now is the time for the Dems to step up to the plate and demonstrate that they can compromise for the good of the country. I'm betting that Mr.O. will continue to put his party ahead of U.S.A.
Pay attention to what he does , not what he says he will do. Up to this point the only thing he cut was the White House tours.
Pay attention to what he does , not what he says he will do. Up to this point the only thing he cut was the White House tours.
Apr 6, 2013 11:12:52 #
I think it's funny politician's have yet to realize that we have a lack of money problem.
Apr 6, 2013 12:17:25 #
jcs
Loc: USA
yhtomit wrote:
I think it's funny politician's have yet to realize that we have a lack of money problem.
as soon as those damned Conservatives in the House let obama spend another $6 Trillion in " shovel ready jobs " , all our lack of money problems will go away
Apr 6, 2013 12:18:19 #
jcs wrote:
as soon as those damned Conservatives in the House let obama spend another $6 Trillion in " shovel ready jobs " , all our lack of money problems will go away
It was the plan that was "shovel ready", not the projects.
Apr 6, 2013 12:19:18 #
RichieC
Loc: Adirondacks
Being there is little progress, then by definition that can't obstruct progress, but perhaps regress... which IS the direction everything is headed... so perhaps its needs some blocking.
Frank T wrote:
I'd be very surprised if the Republican House did anything but obstruct progress.
Apr 6, 2013 12:26:49 #
PrairieSeasons wrote:
It was the plan that was "shovel ready", not the projects.
His plans have definitely been shoveling something... :roll:
Apr 6, 2013 14:05:33 #
yhtomit wrote:
I think it's funny politician's have yet to realize that we have a lack of money problem.
Lack of money isn't their problem.
Their borrowing from China is unlimited.
Apr 6, 2013 15:13:44 #
BigBear wrote:
Lack of money isn't their problem.
Their borrowing from China is unlimited.
Their borrowing from China is unlimited.
Check the recent Treasury auctions - China isn't buying. The Federal Reserve Bank is printing the money and buying the Treasuries.
Apr 6, 2013 15:20:28 #
ole sarg
Loc: south florida
Perhaps you should take a good course in economics because your ignorance is showing.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.