Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
True Macro-Photography Forum
Lovebird Feather
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 26, 2013 18:44:19   #
nanaval Loc: Cornwall
 
Just trying my hand at stacking, I have downloaded Zerene Stacker on a 30 day trial. the image is made with 78 pictures. I use a Nikon D300 at ISO 640, with Sigma 105-mm f/2.8 macro lens, settings focal length 105 mm, exposure 1/250-sec at f/6.5. Captured on the window sill with just natural light. I also used a mag slider and in live view turned the slider a fraction at a time. Any info on a good stacking program would be welcome as I do not much about them. Also any critique welcome though I know that I have the top left corner and some feather tips out of focus.

Lovebird Feather
Lovebird Feather...

Reply
Mar 26, 2013 19:08:15   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Such fine feather tips move just from normal breathing, 2-feet away. You done good!

Reply
Mar 26, 2013 19:32:28   #
nanaval Loc: Cornwall
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
Such fine feather tips move just from normal breathing, 2-feet away. You done good!
Thank you Nikonian 72, much appreciated.

Reply
 
 
Mar 26, 2013 20:19:18   #
tinusbum Loc: east texas
 
very nice! i use zerene stacker and i like it.tom

Reply
Mar 26, 2013 20:42:59   #
Erv Loc: Medina Ohio
 
Very nice!!! I have been playing with that program to and like it very much.
Erv

Reply
Mar 26, 2013 21:17:25   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
Excellent first stack. You could sacrifice some shutter duration and drop the iso, since you have a stable set-up.

Zerene is a good program, although I haven't used it much. I use Helicon Focus. I tried several freeware stacking programs-- and was not impressed. Essentially, went with Helicon because Zerene was not Mac compatible when I was looking to buy.

Reply
Mar 27, 2013 06:15:20   #
nanaval Loc: Cornwall
 
tinusbum wrote:
very nice! i use zerene stacker and i like it.tom


Thanks tinusbum for comment. I have used the stacker in CS6 and found that it did not do too well on a lot less photos so thought I would try a dedicated software.

Reply
 
 
Mar 27, 2013 06:17:28   #
nanaval Loc: Cornwall
 
Erv wrote:
Very nice!!! I have been playing with that program to and like it very much.
Erv


Thanks Erv, will be doing a lot of playing in the next 30 days to really try it out.

Reply
Mar 27, 2013 06:23:25   #
nanaval Loc: Cornwall
 
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
Excellent first stack. You could sacrifice some shutter duration and drop the iso, since you have a stable set-up.
Zerene is a good program, although I haven't used it much. I use Helicon Focus. I tried several freeware stacking programs-- and was not impressed. Essentially, went with Helicon because Zerene was not Mac compatible when I was looking to buy.
Thanks for the great comment and will try what you say. I looked at the Helicon Focus and may even download for a trial if they do one.

Reply
Mar 27, 2013 12:20:33   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
nanaval wrote:
Thanks for the great comment and will try what you say. I looked at the Helicon Focus and may even download for a trial if they do one.
I had a 30-day trial before I took the plunge. Doesn't hurt to compare. I did the same with HDR software. It's a good way to see if the process works for your style and which one has tools & a work flow that fits.

Reply
Mar 27, 2013 12:30:06   #
nanaval Loc: Cornwall
 
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
I had a 30-day trial before I took the plunge. Doesn't hurt to compare. I did the same with HDR software. It's a good way to see if the process works for your style and which one has tools & a work flow that fits.
I will try Helicon Focus and do the same picture in it to see how I get on.

Reply
 
 
Mar 27, 2013 12:42:28   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
nanaval wrote:
I will try Helicon Focus and do the same picture in it to see how I get on.
You might try some 3:1 to 1:1 images to compare how they do with smaller objects and smaller working distances. Check for "halos" and bokeh. Sometimes it helps to intentionally leave off some images to have DOF in some parts of the image AND maintain bokeh. (Stephen O'Shea & I have had some discussions on this- so check out his recent posts... if you have interest in this)

Reply
Mar 27, 2013 13:57:29   #
nanaval Loc: Cornwall
 
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
You might try some 3:1 to 1:1 images to compare how they do with smaller objects and smaller working distances. Check for "halos" and bokeh. Sometimes it helps to intentionally leave off some images to have DOF in some parts of the image AND maintain bokeh. (Stephen O'Shea & I have had some discussions on this- so check out his recent posts... if you have interest in this)
Thanks and yes I am interested, I have only stacked in Photoshop with about 4 pictures and would like to learn more. I have read about bokeh but not quite understanding what is meant by it. I am now off to my camera club where we have fun competitions every month and tonight is macro but not flowers or insects , hence me trying the feather. Will look up your discussions with Stephen O'Shea when I get back.

Reply
Mar 27, 2013 14:09:27   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
nanaval wrote:
I have read about bokeh but not quite understanding what is meant by it.
"Bokeh" is the result when selective focus and limited DOF create a "creamy" background. It's helps emphasize the "point" of the image. I believe it is a Japanese word-- but not sure of the literal translation.

Reply
Mar 27, 2013 17:40:51   #
nanaval Loc: Cornwall
 
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
"Bokeh" is the result when selective focus and limited DOF create a "creamy" background.
Thanks, something on these lines?

Zip
Zip...

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
True Macro-Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.