Just bought a used, very clean Nikon 105MM, the Macro forum here hooked me. This water chestnut on my windowsill has a flower head approximately 1/2" long. Not the best model (or photo) but technically is or isn't it a macro photo. Taken in ambient light, f11, 1/40, ISO200.
Water Chestnut
Bret
Loc: Dayton Ohio
Not bad at all. Flowers often make great models for macro work.
Your first image is technically a close-up, not a macro. 1/2-inch = approx 12.5-mm. Your Nikon sensor is 23.6-mm x 15.8-mm. True macro is 1:1, so you can see that your lens is too far away to capture macro. 1:1 in camera means focus set at Minimum Working Distance of 6.3-inches.
Not to worry, though. Most of us shoot farther back than MFD for better DoF, then crop to macro equivalent Field of View, as in image #2.
Not too shabby! I recommend that you read through
FAQ: How to Document Field-of-View of a Macro Lens at
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-36370-1.html , and do a little macro exercising.
Is your lens a 105D or 105G?
Thanks for the comments and advice. It is a 105G. I will read the recommended FAQ.
The FAQ enlightened me. I will practice a bit before I post a true macro photo. I see now where a focus rail tripod attachment helps.
joehel2 wrote:
The FAQ enlightened me. I will practice a bit before I post a true macro photo. I see now where a focus rail tripod attachment helps.
ALL of my field macro-photography is hand-held, Nikon D5000 & Nikkor 105G lens. See my macro illumination system here:
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-32754-1.html#511426
i like it,you dont need a rail or even a tripod to shoot macro.most of mine are handheld too.tom
Thanks for the advice. I have admired the macro work of all who have commented.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.