Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Double exposure probably possible some day.
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Mar 1, 2013 09:20:06   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
wilsondl2 wrote:
Back in the 70's and 80's if you did Weddings you did double exposures. It was what set you apart as a pro. Since anyone can do them in PP they have just went out of style as they should. Other than the fun of doing them in the camera they should be done in PP. - Dave


:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 1, 2013 09:26:04   #
F16 Club
 
Virgil wrote:
Adding to my want list of features is in camera double exposure.
I think it is possible if they put their minds to it. How about your first shot recorded on all the pixels with odd numbered addresses and your second shot recorded on all the pixels with even numbered addresses. Writing to you recording medium would only take place after the second shot. Just takes a little programming, thats all. Then you wouldn't have to wait for post processing. Anyone else interested? Virgil

Virgil; Almost all respected camera in market has in retouch menu overlay, that is almost the same you want.


:mrgreen:

Reply
Mar 1, 2013 09:32:23   #
jimbrown3 Loc: Naples, FL
 
Multiple exposures are great for fireworks. July 4th is coming !

Reply
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Mar 1, 2013 10:09:44   #
gumeng Loc: El Paso, TX
 
Digital Rev TV did a feature on this topic. Funny in their typical fashion.

Reply
Mar 1, 2013 11:07:27   #
wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
Wahawk wrote:
wilsondl2 wrote:
Back in the 70's and 80's if you did Weddings you did double exposures. It was what set you apart as a pro. Since anyone can do them in PP they have just went out of style as they should. Other than the fun of doing them in the camera they should be done in PP. - Dave


:thumbup: :thumbup:


Just for fun here are a couple from back in the day - Dave





Reply
Mar 1, 2013 11:15:10   #
GregShea Loc: Redding, Ca
 
D300 and d7000 have that ability. You can pick up a d300 used for around $500 in good condition right now. I've taken some double exposure shots with my D300 and it works great.



Reply
Mar 1, 2013 12:41:10   #
PhotoArtsLA Loc: Boynton Beach
 
In a world where the digital darkroom has changed the equation, particularly in the case of higher end programs like Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro, the need to do double exposures in-camera, where you have a hit and miss at best probability of getting a good result...

I would think more about shooting for post than shooting with limitation, which has always been the stuff of double or multi exposures.

Simple "Double Exposure" in Photoshop
Simple "Double Exposure" in Photoshop...

Reply
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Mar 1, 2013 13:26:53   #
bigmare
 
My Nikon D3000 has this feature -- it is called overlay

Reply
Mar 1, 2013 14:28:27   #
georgevedwards Loc: Essex, Maryland.
 
I used to love double and even many exposures on my film cameras. You say Nikon DSLR's do double exposures...how about my Nikon D3200?
MT Shooter wrote:
Almost all Nikon DSLRs offer it. Its an easy task to accomplish.

Reply
Mar 1, 2013 14:29:12   #
georgevedwards Loc: Essex, Maryland.
 
Neat! First time I have seen wedding doubles.
wilsondl2 wrote:
Wahawk wrote:
wilsondl2 wrote:
Back in the 70's and 80's if you did Weddings you did double exposures. It was what set you apart as a pro. Since anyone can do them in PP they have just went out of style as they should. Other than the fun of doing them in the camera they should be done in PP. - Dave


:thumbup: :thumbup:


Just for fun here are a couple from back in the day - Dave

Reply
Mar 1, 2013 14:29:50   #
georgevedwards Loc: Essex, Maryland.
 
Love it! How do you do?
PhotoArtsLA wrote:
In a world where the digital darkroom has changed the equation, particularly in the case of higher end programs like Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro, the need to do double exposures in-camera, where you have a hit and miss at best probability of getting a good result...

I would think more about shooting for post than shooting with limitation, which has always been the stuff of double or multi exposures.

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2013 15:06:39   #
wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
georgevedwards wrote:
I used to love double and even many exposures on my film cameras. You say Nikon DSLR's do double exposures...how about my Nikon D3200?
MT Shooter wrote:
Almost all Nikon DSLRs offer it. Its an easy task to accomplish.


In my Nikon D80 & D90 Insturction books the how too is listed under Multiple not double exposure. - Dave

Reply
Mar 1, 2013 15:16:43   #
georgevedwards Loc: Essex, Maryland.
 
Love it! How do you do?
PhotoArtsLA wrote:
In a world where the digital darkroom has changed the equation, particularly in the case of higher end programs like Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro, the need to do double exposures in-camera, where you have a hit and miss at best probability of getting a good result...

I would think more about shooting for post than shooting with limitation, which has always been the stuff of double or multi exposures.

Reply
Mar 1, 2013 15:24:19   #
georgevedwards Loc: Essex, Maryland.
 
I was just inspired to try some fireworks using multiple exposure in Photoshop.

Fireworks Multiple Exp
Fireworks Multiple Exp...

Reply
Mar 1, 2013 15:26:11   #
PhotoArtsLA Loc: Boynton Beach
 
In the computer, you can layer images and choose your transparency and opacity. This allows a multi exposure look with complete control.

I played with fireworks too!

This is a view from my backyard.
This is a view from my backyard....

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.