Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lens Compare
Feb 27, 2013 17:48:38   #
cruizer Loc: Bucks Co., Pa. (USA)
 
I have a d7000 with an 18-200 3.5-5.6 lens as well as a 35mm 1.8 prime lens. I seem to be able to get the same quality results in relatively low light (not nighttime) using PP. I shoot landscape, some interior family gatherings, and and some family portraits.

Do I need both of these lenses? If so, any suggestions on when each would be appropriate to use?

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 19:31:24   #
haroldross Loc: Walthill, Nebraska
 
You probably don't need both but I would recommend you keep both. The 35mm is a much faster lens than the zoom and I'll venture to say, the image quality is much better with the prime lens.

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 20:21:17   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
You will find lots of uses for that 35mm doing indoor or low-light shooting. I would keep it. For outdoors in good light, the zoom will be every bit as good.

Reply
 
 
Feb 27, 2013 20:25:18   #
cruizer Loc: Bucks Co., Pa. (USA)
 
Thanks MT

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 20:28:35   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
Anytime

Reply
Feb 28, 2013 08:12:22   #
jimbrown3 Loc: Naples, FL
 
MT makes great sense. Keep it !

Reply
Feb 28, 2013 12:57:53   #
fabfab Loc: Marietta GA
 
KEEP it for this reason: Most zoom lenses have barrel or pincushion distortion which will make a door frame look bowed in or out, etc. The 35mm prime does have this problem

Reply
 
 
Feb 28, 2013 13:11:06   #
fabfab Loc: Marietta GA
 
I meant does NOT have this priblem

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.