Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Shutter speed-actual time
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Feb 27, 2013 09:20:10   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
cjkorb wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
The camera shutter is a two part system. The first shutter starts to move across the sensor and expose it to the light. Then the second "curtain" of the shutter starts to close. On fast shutter speeds the second curtain is already closing before the first curtain has completely moved across the sensor. The exposure time is calculated by the exact amount of time any one particular pixel has been exposed to the light, not necessarily the entire sensor surface. All pixels of the sensor will be exposed exactly the same amount of time. On long exposures, the first curtain reaches full open and the sensor is fully exposed for the duration before the second curtain closes. The shutter moves extremely fast, this is what allows those 1/8000 sec shutter speeds to be accurate.
The camera shutter is a two part system. The first... (show quote)
And a very good answer! So if the shutter speed is set at, say, 1/25 of a second, that doesn't necessarily mean the whole sensor was exposed at 1/25 of a second.
quote=MT Shooter The camera shutter is a two part... (show quote)

MT Shooter's explanation is spot on. Another way of looking at it might help.

Imagine this process happening in slow motion. At very high shutter speeds the second shutter is following closely behind the first, so a narrow slit of light passes over the image. Each pixel gets exposed for the same amount of time, but not at the same time.

If the subject is not moving, this makes no difference. But if you take a picture of a speeding car and your shutter moves vertically, the top of the tires will be captured at a different time than the bottom, so they will not appear to be round but leaning forward or back depending on the direction the shutter travels.

So to answer your question, the whole sensor is exposed for the same amount of time at 1/25 of a second, but just not the same precise point in time.

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 09:33:39   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
quonnie wrote:
Please forgive my ignorance, but on what type camera is a "leaf shutter" found?


Some film camera examples: Hassleblad (not the 1000f), Mamiya RB 67, later Bronica, twin lens reflex cameras, Crown Graphic, most large format cameras, film point & shoot cameras, a few 35mm slrs...Topcon Unirex & 100, Kowa.

Advantage to the leaf shutter is that you could sync the flash up to the max shutter setting, usually 1/500th. (the Super Speed Graphic went to 1/1000) The max on horizontal focal plane shutters was around 1/60, until the invention of the vertical shutter.

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 09:34:56   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
selmslie wrote:

If the subject is not moving, this makes no difference. But if you take a picture of a speeding car and your shutter moves vertically, the top of the tires will be captured at a different time than the bottom, so they will not appear to be round but leaning forward or back depending on the direction the shutter travels.




Reply
 
 
Feb 27, 2013 09:44:25   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
Pablo8 wrote:


Consider this, then... A leaf shutter (as opposed to a focal-plane shutter) I hope you know the difference. With the aperture set at full-bore for instance f/1.4..OK are you keeping up? The shutter blades open from their closed position, and exposure begins to take place. But the aperture through which the light is coming, is changing from a tiny hole (f/32...f/22..f/16 ) etc., to the full opening area of the diaphragm blades..f/1.4 and the shutter blades close down again through the ever diminishing size hole. So...some of the exposure has been made through an aperture other than your selected f/1.4....Fact?...or Fiction?
br br Consider this, then... A leaf shutter (as ... (show quote)


Interesting question. I think because it happens so quickly (partly because a leaf shutter has a shorter distance to travel), that it probably didn't make much of a measureable difference.
The fastest lens I know of for a leaf shutter was 1.7 on a Yashica Electro 35. My Topcon Unirex SLR had an f/2 50mm.

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 09:47:58   #
wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
I do not think you can get the oblong tire effect with DSLRs. The sensor size is not big enough and the shutter is moving too fast. The old time pictures you see with this effect were taken with 4X5 film. Also the shutter went down not sideways as on DSLRs. Since the shutter started on the top and the picture was inverted by the lens the bottom of the car was taken first then as the shutter slit went down the top was taken last. - Dave

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 09:49:15   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
wilsondl2 wrote:
I do not think you can get the oblong tire effect with DSLRs. The sensor size is not big enough and the shutter is moving too fast. The old time pictures you see with this effect were taken with 4X5 film. Also the shutter went down not sideways as on DSLRs. Since the shutter started on the top and the picture was inverted by the lens the bottom of the car was taken first then as the shutter slit went down the top was taken last. - Dave


DSLR shutters are vertical.
Maybe the old Speed Graphic shutters just traveled slower.... We know they had a lot farther to go.

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 10:03:48   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
wilsondl2 wrote:
I do not think you can get the oblong tire effect with DSLRs. The sensor size is not big enough and the shutter is moving too fast. The old time pictures you see with this effect were taken with 4X5 film. Also the shutter went down not sideways as on DSLRs. Since the shutter started on the top and the picture was inverted by the lens the bottom of the car was taken first then as the shutter slit went down the top was taken last. - Dave


All DSLR shutters lay horizontally, but travel vertically. This is primarily to allow for faster shutter speeds as the vertical travel direction corresponds with the narrowest dimension of the sensor making for the shortest travel distance.

Reply
 
 
Feb 27, 2013 10:07:31   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
selmslie wrote:

If the subject is not moving, this makes no difference. But if you take a picture of a speeding car and your shutter moves vertically, the top of the tires will be captured at a different time than the bottom, so they will not appear to be round but leaning forward or back depending on the direction the shutter travels.


I like those pictures of the old racers. The tire illusion must have confused people back then.

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 10:17:51   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
wilsondl2 wrote:
I do not think you can get the oblong tire effect with DSLRs. The sensor size is not big enough and the shutter is moving too fast. The old time pictures you see with this effect were taken with 4X5 film. Also the shutter went down not sideways as on DSLRs. Since the shutter started on the top and the picture was inverted by the lens the bottom of the car was taken first then as the shutter slit went down the top was taken last. - Dave

Yes, you can get the same effect with DSLR. The mechanics of a focal plane shutter are identical.

I have seen examples of it with modern racing cars. I just can't put my hands on a current example, maybe someone else will.

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 10:18:00   #
PhotoArtsLA Loc: Boynton Beach
 
This is a strange thread, with a mix of accuracy and lack of understanding. The problem is, weighing in on the side of accuracy, amidst a tide of lack of understanding, when accuracy has been mentioned... might just add to others puzzlement.

But, to have some fun... there are fast sync modes on most modern DSLRs allowing flash photography, ONLY WITH OEM SPEEDLIGHTS, at essentially all shutter speeds. Like 1/2500th. Or faster. This is very good for working with these tiny strobes, which really don't have sun crushing power, in sunny situations. The use of fast shutter speeds provides a workaround for the low power of the speedlight.

With professional strobes, you are limited by the given shutter mechanism. Focal plane shutters need to sync with the flash pulse to allow full exposure of the frame. Focal Plane Shutters are not fast enough for fast shutter speed shooting under pro strobes. With a DSLR, this limits the shutter speed to the rated "max" which is usually around 1/250th.

On cameras like the Hasselblad, with leaf shutters, which are sort of like a very fast iris which fully opens and fully closes for each shot. This type of shutter syncs at all speeds even with pro strobes because the mechanism is quick enough to allow it.

Simply put, the shutter must be open while the pro strobe is flashing.

It is not the case that each pixel "needs 1/200th of a second" even at fast shooting speeds.

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 10:23:17   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
Pablo8 wrote:


Consider this, then... A leaf shutter (as opposed to a focal-plane shutter) I hope you know the difference. With the aperture set at full-bore for instance f/1.4..OK are you keeping up? The shutter blades open from their closed position, and exposure begins to take place. But the aperture through which the light is coming, is changing from a tiny hole (f/32...f/22..f/16 ) etc., to the full opening area of the diaphragm blades..f/1.4 and the shutter blades close down again through the ever diminishing size hole. So...some of the exposure has been made through an aperture other than your selected f/1.4....Fact?...or Fiction?
br br Consider this, then... A leaf shutter (as ... (show quote)


Interesting question. I think because it happens so quickly (partly because a leaf shutter has a shorter distance to travel), that it probably didn't make much of a measureable difference.
The fastest lens I know of for a leaf shutter was 1.7 on a Yashica Electro 35. My Topcon Unirex SLR had an f/2 50mm.
quote=Pablo8 br br Consider this, then... A lea... (show quote)

Leaf shutters are much slower (1/500 max) and much less precise. Even the best may be off as much as a half stop at the highest speed.

Since leaf shutters are normally used for longer exposures this is not normally an ssue.

Reply
 
 
Feb 27, 2013 11:16:13   #
wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
All DSLR shutters lay horizontally, but travel vertically. This is primarily to allow for faster shutter speeds as the vertical travel direction corresponds with the narrowest dimension of the sensor making for the shortest travel distance.[/quote]

I stand corrected. I thought DSLR shutters were like toh shutters on the old SLR. They do travel horizontally. - Dave

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 11:22:06   #
GHK Loc: The Vale of Eden
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
Unfortunately, the term shutter "speed" has been incorrectly used for decades. The speed of the leading shutter and the trailing shutter are constant. What varies is the timing between curtains, which alters the time duration that the sensor sees the scene between curtains.

"Shutter duration" is a more accurate term to describe shutter speed.


Agreed.
GHK

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 11:42:05   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
wilsondl2 wrote:


I stand corrected. I thought DSLR shutters were like toh shutters on the old SLR. They do travel horizontally. - Dave



I sort of miss being able to open the back and see the actual shutter.
Bought a few Nikkormats recently to make some lamps.
(They still work!)
I took them to a boy scout photography merit badge class a few weeks ago and used them to show how the shutter works. Even hooked up a flash so they could see what happens when you pick a setting higher than the 1/125th sync setting. (The Nikkormat had a vertical traveling Copal shutter). They worked great as a teaching tool.

Reply
Feb 27, 2013 12:04:28   #
wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
selmslie wrote:
wilsondl2 wrote:
I do not think you can get the oblong tire effect with DSLRs. The sensor size is not big enough and the shutter is moving too fast. The old time pictures you see with this effect were taken with 4X5 film. Also the shutter went down not sideways as on DSLRs. Since the shutter started on the top and the picture was inverted by the lens the bottom of the car was taken first then as the shutter slit went down the top was taken last. - Dave

Yes, you can get the same effect with DSLR. The mechanics of a focal plane shutter are identical.

Getting off the original thread but this is sort of interesting. Here is a picture of the smallest slit (I see that they call it an aperture.) on a Graphic. I also took a picture of the exposure info that is on the Speed Graphic. Your had five different tensions (speeds) the curtain would travel and four different apertures. If you used the smallest aperture and the slowest tension you would get the oblong effect on the tires. With today's fast cars you would be able to get it with a DSLR . I stand corrected again. - Dave
I have seen examples of it with modern racing cars. I just can't put my hands on a current example, maybe someone else will.
quote=wilsondl2 I do not think you can get the ob... (show quote)





Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.