Am I correct to assume, that prejudice is OK? What is wrong with disagreeing with other beliefs while remaining tolerant? However, I do accept your right to your opinion. Yet, it is my right to use use your opinion to judge you, and I think you are part of society's problem, and in fact I think you are a self centered asshole. How presumptuous to label differences in religious beliefs as "standards". How presumptuous of you to assume that I would be "OK with just gay weddings" as if that was an insult to me or the gay community. Fuck you and the horse you rode in on. I'm embarrassed to share a forum with you. I'd tell you to suck my dick but I'm afraid you would enjoy it.

Attn: Moderator. No need to throw me out. I'm unsubscribing from this predominantly aged white group of men.

I find it prejudiced. And for an incorporated business (if he is) a person needs to give up those prejudices in exchange for the other benefits of incorporation. I, personally, think it speaks to character, imposing or punishing others because of ones own beliefs. The religion one assumes is almost always based on where one was born. Middle East: Islam. United States: Protestant 52%, Roman Catholic 24%, Mormon 2%, Jewish 1%, Muslim 1%, none 10% . Columbia: Roman Catholic. Denmark: Lutheran. I realize Christianity is the majority in the US, but his personal beliefs exclude many decent couples. Would he take pictures at a gay Christian wedding?

I've enjoyed many of his posts. But I did find something on his website a few years ago that bothered me. He said that he only shoots Christian weddings. I have not looked recently to see if the statement is still there, but it was once, and every time his name comes up I'm reminded of it. His viewpoint, at least at that point in time, has no bearing on his reviews.

Depends on nose length...... :)

I found that long exposure NR made the difference between usable and not. That was on a Nikon D90. I have not tried any night photography with my D500.

If s/he can write the gear off on their taxes. Legitimately.

It depends. Yesterday I took a couple hundred photos in a darkened auditorium of the grandkids dance recital. Chimping would have been extremely rude. But I checked a few photos at intermission.

And this is one reason camera stores are struggling. You saved some sales tax while the business owner lost money providing knowledgeable staff for you for free. Too many people do that and you'll be lamenting the closing of another camera store.

Along that same line, a husband bet his wife that she could not say something, in one sentence, which would make him feel both good and bad simultaneously. She responded, "you are better in bed than your brother".

I believe that problem has been solved. But I do not know the time period of manufacturing where it was a problem. I would not worry about tin whiskers on new electronics.

Personality disorder? Social skills? IBS?

Better members. There are some real a$$holes here. But look at the bright side of it. If they are taking out their frustrations online they are not screaming at the little kids to get off my lawn.

I took a macro photograph of a kidney stone, and sent it to my geologist daughter. She couldn't identify it. Didn't talk to me for weeks.....

Do you know why cowboys all have the same size balls? So they can borrow each others horse trailers......

Good catch!