Posts for: SteveS
May 4, 2024 19:35:54 #
Texcaster wrote:
What?? I said "You are parsing violent rape-sexual assault nuance." And ... you are in meltdown that someone might think of Trump as a rapist. Sexual assaulter is OK but not rapist. I understand. Got it. Adjudicated rapist.
I have to give you credit, your commitment to being stupid is to be commended.
May 4, 2024 18:55:20 #
Texcaster wrote:
Now! Are you insane? He wants to canonize Ginni Thomas and the other J6 plotters! But reality check here. I'm not the one parsing violent rape-sexual assault nuance. You are. When is *it a plus on the campaign trail? You'd all do it if you were Tv businessman stars?
*violent rape-sexual assault nuance
*violent rape-sexual assault nuance
Just more babbling and gum flapping from a UHH know it all. I have never defended Trump's conviction for sexual abuse, and after being found guilty he should be punished, and he was. You seem to have an opinion that he was convicted of rape, and continue to push that narrative, even when there is proof that proves you are wrong. If opinions are to be believed rather than truth, you should have no problem when Biden is called a pedophile, or that he has received pay for play from other countries. After all that is an opinion that is being reported and passed around here on the Hog, without being proven, so should it be considered as truth?
May 4, 2024 17:49:54 #
[quote=robertjerl]But after the verdict was read the judge "declared" it was rape - which of course has no legal standing and is just the judge's opinion.[/quote
Exactly
Exactly
May 4, 2024 16:56:35 #
Texcaster wrote:
Try your reading skills out on this: I will not le... (show quote)
You should really take a couple years off from being a liberal, and allow your brain cells to heal.
May 4, 2024 11:00:00 #
Texcaster wrote:
It's always sort of endearing when one of the keen... (show quote)
Don't blame the MAGA or anyone else for your inability to read, or understand a Verdict Form from the United States District Court Southern District of New York. It is in plain English, and only requires a simple Yes or No answer. Maybe you don't agree with the answer, but that doesn't change the facts nor court records that support the "No" verdict for the question, "Did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of evidence, that Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll." It doesn't matter how many Liberals you quote nor how many Liberal News sources you post, the official records on file will prove that you are wrong.
May 3, 2024 22:46:25 #
gorgehiker wrote:
The new GOP standard for presidential candidates in the Trump era - sexual abuse is not a problem as long as no actual rape is proven
What a country we live in. Imagine a jury finds there is not enough evidence to prove a rape happened, and the defendant is not found guilty of that crime. But then just maybe that’s the way it’s suppose to work.
May 3, 2024 14:41:08 #
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
The judge clarified the finding as rape.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/
Seems the judge was wrong.
Apr 21, 2024 10:44:30 #
RixPix wrote:
He's better than Jesus so he can do anything...don't ya know!
Maybe you should get him to correct your eyesight.
Apr 19, 2024 18:05:08 #
RixPix wrote:
It is sad because it is true
That's a pretty good trick to be able to turn his hand 180˚ and have his fingers pointing right and around the short blonds waist. Must be double jointed, or it could be just as the picture shows, the arm from the women on the right with her arm around the waist of the short blond. What is sad but true, is that you should find a good optometrist.
Apr 19, 2024 14:32:47 #
RixPix wrote:
It’s funny because it’s true
You should have flushed it when you finished.
Apr 19, 2024 13:46:55 #
There have been many over the years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tefQuH40MIw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmM1B_mmTk8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e9Y1wcOJ1o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tefQuH40MIw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmM1B_mmTk8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e9Y1wcOJ1o
Apr 18, 2024 18:35:06 #
DennyT wrote:
SteveS wrote: br They have a signed letter from St... (show quote)
In his statement to the New York Times, Cohen stated that, “Neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford, and neither reimbursed me for the payment, either directly or indirectly.”
Is Cohen lying about being reimbursed, or about not being reimbursed? You can't have it both ways.
Apr 18, 2024 14:27:24 #
Frank T wrote:
She can prove it happened by describing his little mushroom dick. If it didn't happen, why would he give her 130k?
They have a signed letter from Stormy stating the affair didn't happened. She has either lied that the affair happened or she has lied that the affair didn't happen. Which is it? She has been caught, and will have to lie again trying to protect herself. Perjury as a witness can be costly. As the old saying goes damned if you do, damned if you don't. By the way, Trump didn't give her any money, Cohen did. If the prosecution calls her as a witness knowing she is a lier, maybe they aren't as smart as they think they are. She has been ordered twice to pay Trumps legal bills, do you really think she wants that brought up in court again?
Apr 18, 2024 12:02:04 #
Frank T wrote:
That's true, but you still need her testimony and you know they will ask her, "What was your understanding of why Mr. Trump paid you $130,000.00?"
And if she replies that it was hush money after a sexual affair, they will ask how she could have been paid to keep quiet about something that never happened, according to a letter she penned on January 30, 2018.
Apr 17, 2024 13:17:23 #
Been to Abe's many times, his wife Terry makes all the biscuits daily using Martha White flour. You're right. about there being a steady stream of diners at the counter, but the stream of carryout customers is even heavier. Those biscuits are some of the best ever.