Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: cgchief
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 22 next>>
Feb 26, 2016 21:13:33   #
The two gentlemen from California are not an encouragement to this seller. We all know your state is in the 'pits', but there is hope; the San Andreas (spelling?) fault may happen and you can swim away.
Go to
Feb 24, 2016 20:53:08   #
Simmon Chromega D4, autofocus enlarger, exposure timer and power supply, lenses and carriers for 35mm, 2¼ x 2¼, 2¼ x 3¼, and 4 x 5.
Asking $350.00, plus shipping.






Go to
Jan 21, 2016 22:38:36   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Of course I am not offering all of these lenses just showing you what lenses that I have that I am willing to make part of a trade.

8 element 50/1.4
7 element 50/1.4
Super Multi Coated 50/1.4
28/3.5
35/3.5
100/2.8
135/2.8
135/3.5
200/4

K 50/1.4
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 f/3.5 Kiron manufactured
Vivitar 28mm f/2.5 Closeup lens. Koine

Thanks for listing your lenses,but none are no my want list.
I will sell you the Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35mm, with covers and case for $135.00, shipping included.
Thanks.
Go to
Jan 21, 2016 20:30:24   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
In good condition and at a reasonable price.... Or... I have a lot of Taks, maybe we could do some trading.


I have this lens in 'like new condition'; 1:2.3 f=35mm with front and rear covers and leather case.
Please list the Pentax lenses you have available to trade.
Go to
Jan 7, 2016 21:19:08   #
RWR wrote:
May I assume that you did not have a Visoflex for the IIIf?


You are correct, I did not have a Visoflex; nor wanted one.
The problem with the Leica IIIf was the difficulty loading film in the 'out-dated' system they kept too long.
The lenses were OK, view and range finder poor , but you could expose the film.
My conclusion: LEICA over priced. I found a reason for the high price to the common purchaser in this book on page 19, a list of cameras presented to notable people; H.M. Queen Elizabeth II two cameras.
Leica THE FIRST 60 YEARS by G.Rogliatti ISBN 1-874707-02-2
Go to
Jan 5, 2016 21:20:24   #
Dewman wrote:
Before any of you go off on me, I'm NOT trying to start a conflict as to which is better. I'm just curious to find out how many share my experienced with the brand and what particular models they use.

I'm always amused at how vociferous many who shoot "OTHER" brands become when they get even a slight hint that there's a perceived slam against their favorite. Chill, my brothers and sisters. That's not what this is about. ;)

I had a Leica IIIf for several years until my son came home from Vietnam with a Pentax Spotmatic. What a revelation:the Pentax was so superior to the Leica that I immediately bought a Spotmatic; and later a ME super.
Now digital I have an *ist DL, K10D, and the K3; and several lenses.
For Christmas, or was it my birthday on 12-28, I gave myself the Pentax smc DFA 100mm f/2.8 WR Macro lens. Real quality.
Go to
Jan 5, 2016 21:20:23   #
Dewman wrote:
Before any of you go off on me, I'm NOT trying to start a conflict as to which is better. I'm just curious to find out how many share my experienced with the brand and what particular models they use.

I'm always amused at how vociferous many who shoot "OTHER" brands become when they get even a slight hint that there's a perceived slam against their favorite. Chill, my brothers and sisters. That's not what this is about. ;)

I had a Leica IIIf for several years until my son came home from Vietnam with a Pentax Spotmatic. What a revelation:the Pentax was so superior to the Leica that I immediately bought a Spotmatic; and later a ME super.
Now digital I have an *ist DL, K10D, and the K3; and several lenses.
For Christmas, or was it my birthday on 12-28, I gave myself the Pentax smc DFA 100mm f/2.8 WR Macro lens. Real quality.
Go to
Oct 15, 2015 21:53:18   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Moronic comments like yours speak for themselves, I don't have to.


That's condition 'normal' in California.
Go to
Oct 8, 2015 22:21:56   #
oldie65 wrote:
I am using a 70 to 200 2.8 nikon lens,which seems to keep getting heavier for some odd reason,I am 65 now,might have somethig to do with it, just don't know...........what would be the next step down on a good lens not so heavy.my camera is nikon d300.


I will soon be 94; but I have an OP/TECH USA "BINO/CAM HARNESS" which makes the camera and lens seem much lighter. Mine is the model in webbing.
Go to
Oct 8, 2015 22:21:56   #
oldie65 wrote:
I am using a 70 to 200 2.8 nikon lens,which seems to keep getting heavier for some odd reason,I am 65 now,might have somethig to do with it, just don't know...........what would be the next step down on a good lens not so heavy.my camera is nikon d300.


I will soon be 94; but I have an OP/TECH USA "BINO/CAM HARNESS" which makes the camera and lens seem much lighter. Mine is the model in webbing.
Go to
Sep 26, 2015 20:28:30   #
New heavy duty ball mount with quick release plate; I never used it because it is not compatible with Manfrotto.
$20.00 plus postage.
Please contact me by private message.
Thanks.




Go to
Sep 9, 2015 23:00:15   #
ConnieLynn wrote:
I just purchased a new camera and I'm looking for the Manfrotto shoulder strap that has the clamps that slide up/down the strap and the opposing clamps that attached to each side of the camera.

All I can seem to find is straps that connect to the camera by the tripod threads.

Anyone have any suggestions on where to a good strong shoulder strap that does not connect to the tripod threads? I have the Nikon D7200.

Thanks,
Connie

I recommend OP/TECH USA's 'BINO/CAM HARNESS', webbing version.
Go to
Sep 9, 2015 23:00:15   #
ConnieLynn wrote:
I just purchased a new camera and I'm looking for the Manfrotto shoulder strap that has the clamps that slide up/down the strap and the opposing clamps that attached to each side of the camera.

All I can seem to find is straps that connect to the camera by the tripod threads.

Anyone have any suggestions on where to a good strong shoulder strap that does not connect to the tripod threads? I have the Nikon D7200.

Thanks,
Connie

I recommend OP/TECH USA's 'BINO/CAM HARNESS', webbing version.
Go to
Aug 1, 2015 21:04:31   #
russelray wrote:
There's a huge difference between using CAPS sometimes to EMPHASIZE and using all caps all the time. One is considered emphasizing, the other is considered yelling at everyone. Yelling's not necessary unless one is insecure.


Perhaps we are insecure because some weirdos believe CAPS increase the sound level.
Go to
Jul 10, 2015 21:17:36   #
luckycee wrote:
having two problems, I'm using Kodak Photo paper(basic glossy) and can't seem to keep it flat for printing and it jams up the printer.Is there a solution in keeping it flat?
2nd is there a reasonably priced ink available. I have and epson xp-610 and the ink cost are killing me. I know its a low end printer but its all I can afford now. thanks for any help. luckycee


Unable to help with paper problem.
I solved my printer ink problem when I purchased an Epson printer with CIS installed; has 5 refillable 2 oz. bottles outside end of printer. Contact Cobra Ink Service, good company.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 22 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.