Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: WoodnMetalGuy
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
Sep 22, 2017 09:54:43   #
I love the 180 f2.8 D. Much smaller than the zooms, great image quality, less expensive. Great lens. Needs a body with the built-in focus motor for AF, like all AF-D lenses.
Go to
Sep 18, 2017 10:40:19   #
tinplater wrote:
Here is a typical example...I have uploaded the entire large file, when viewed full size in download you will see the problem! ISO 160 f1.4 1/2000 with Canon 5DMIII and 35mm 1.4 Canon lens.


That photo looks pretty nice to me. I wonder if the photographer just added some grain in post processing and it's not noise at all.
Go to
Sep 12, 2017 14:17:06   #
Beercat wrote:
Guess you don't know how to read ... no more wedding uploads from me.


Just curious - what is it you think I was having trouble reading? -- Dave

>>Oh, figured out it may be your post "BTW, who asked for critique". Sorry, that post wasn't showing for me yet when I replied.

>> I was just trying to help you improve in your future work.

>>Here's maybe something to think about: are you equally upset at the people who provided 'nice job, love the photos' critiques?
Go to
Sep 12, 2017 11:37:03   #
I would just suggest you tone down the flash a bit. In my opinion it's too overpowering in most of those images. -- Dave
Go to
Sep 1, 2017 13:17:50   #
Looks like everybody likes it but me! In my opinion, the severe haloing and desaturation going on in the background spoils an otherwise nice shot... -- Dave
Go to
May 2, 2017 10:40:46   #
White House Custom Color (www.whcc.com) is a great resource for this and will drop ship to your customers. Fast, good quality, excellent packaging. I have nothing but good to say about them.

Not sure what you're thinking about the signature duplication thing. But if you have a scanned signature you can include that element in the file you submit, just like any other graphic element.

-- Dave
Go to
Apr 26, 2017 12:58:39   #
One other thing to note is that it appears the whites are blown out. You may want to consider dialing in a little negative exposure compensation in the future when shooting bright whites in the sun like that. If you're shooting raw you may be able to save it, but when they get totally blown out there's no help for it... -- Dave
Go to
Apr 26, 2017 10:10:48   #
It has a graphic quality to it that's kind of interesting. If you like it, it's good.

Personally, I might back off a bit. The dark halos around the players' legs bother me a bit.

-- Dave
Go to
Apr 25, 2017 11:41:54   #
Yes, sounds like edge sharpness would be a moot point for you using it on DX sensor. And you might even want to look for the previous version of the 70-200, which vignettes on FX sensor but works great on DX, and should be cheaper yet. -- Dave
Go to
Mar 31, 2017 10:38:42   #
Dan -

Also, remember the layers part is optional. You can do all the light painting in one take, and you'll have a single image in camera just like any other photo.

I think it's rewarding in that it really puts you in touch with lighting and how applying light from various directions affects the final image.

-- Dave
Go to
Mar 31, 2017 10:33:19   #
texasdan78070 wrote:
I have laid to rest anything that mentions 'layers'. I can't seem to wrap my brain around it


Hey Dan - One way that I think is helpful to think about layers for those of us of a certain age is to think back to school days and overhead projectors. Do you remember the transparencies, sheets of clear plastic that you could write on, and the image was projected on a screen? And you could stack multiple transparencies and the projected image would reflect the combination? That's basically how layers work...

-- Dave
Go to
Mar 30, 2017 11:56:18   #
TopDrifter wrote:
I'm interested in light painting, do you have an example image to view...


Here's a light-painted photo of a portion of a toy steam engine. Looking at the shadows you can see light was applied from various directions, including back lighting. Again, this is done in darkness with the exception of the illumination light, which you move around to paint light on the subject. I had this model sitting on a black velvet backdrop.

This is an example where I took multiple frames and then combined them in GIMP, allowing me to vary the light ratios. This is fun stuff!

-- Dave


(Download)
Go to
Mar 30, 2017 11:21:30   #
As an idea for future shots like this, you might consider light-painting to get a more pleasing photo.

If you haven't done that before, the basic process is to put the camera on tripod, turn all the lights out, open the shutter in bulb mode, then paint the model with light from various directions using a small flashlight or similar, then close the shutter, turn on the lights, and review your image.

There is creativity involved in doing the actual light painting, which is fun. Results can be very dramatic.

For another twist on that, take multiple frames. Maybe illuminate from the top in one frame, from the front quarter, from the back, from the rear, then composite them using GIMP or photoshop. This lets you balance the illumination from the various directions, and takes away some of the stress of getting it exactly right in one take.

-- Dave
Go to
Mar 14, 2017 10:35:06   #
therwol wrote:
This is not a constant aperture lens. The electronic diaphragm doesn't work on any pre-2007 cameras, hence you have to use the lens wide open. If you put this lens on a D750, D810, Df etc, you get the full range of f stops.


I believe constant aperture' in this case refers to the fact that the maximum aperture does not change when you zoom the lens. Based on that, this is a constant aperture lens. -- Dave
Go to
Mar 8, 2017 10:30:27   #
Lots of good saguaro and other cactus with mountain backgrounds in Usery Mountain Recreation Area, Mesa Az. Easy access north on Ellsworth Road. Take the Wind Cave hike out and back, or go around the mountain on Pass Mountain Trail (approx 8 miles). -- Dave
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.