Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: BruceLR
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
Apr 10, 2021 17:38:34   #
rob7789 wrote:
Those profiles were for the individual stores that did their own processing. Costco closed the processing in those stores and now only does it online through a central location.


You are correct and I apologize for posting incorrect info. I contacted Costco Photo Customer Service and was directed to the www.profilemyphotos.com website as others have mentioned. They did confirm that they are using the Fuji printers for the photos and the Epson for the posters. So, why the original profiles don't work I don't know. The price is right so I guess that making some prints is the best way to test it out.
Go to
Apr 10, 2021 15:14:33   #
DanielB wrote:
General question hopefully someone will have an answer to.

Now that Costco has eliminated there in house printing where does one go to find their icc printer profiles. I can't find anything online about it. My last prints from them were flat and lifeless.


Dry Creek still has the profiles. Link is for Washington state but other states links on the left.
https://www.drycreekphoto.com/icc/Profiles/Washington_profiles.htm#WA
Go to
Mar 13, 2021 21:27:55   #
As the free site notes you can still download it and use it. It's just that they are not maintaining it. It works well. I used it until I decided to go with the pro version to support the product.
Go to
Mar 13, 2021 15:41:20   #
Norm11 wrote:
Some of us live (or have spouses!) that live in "I'llgetaroundtoittommorrowland".

Thus, their phones, tablets and computers get filled with redundant and mostly useless old photo files. There are several software solutions to removing these byte-eaters. Can anyone provide a recommendation based on personal experience for a good, cost-effective one?


You might take a look at XYplorer. Very robust file manager for Windows including a multi-faceted duplicate finder. There is a free version and a pro version ($40). Both versions have a duplicate file finder function. Search for either xyplorer free or simply xyplorer.
Go to
Oct 14, 2020 12:52:14   #
I had contacted them about it and, after reviewing my image, they said there was no improvement to be made for the Xpozer format. BTW, Bay Photo is a great company and I've had wonderful results working with them for my metal prints.
Go to
Oct 2, 2020 13:36:27   #
JD750 wrote:
No this is not a misplaced boudoir post. Xpozer is a printing company.

Anybody here use them? What was your experience using them?


I have tried it once with a 20 x 30 and was very disappointed. The colors were flat and looked washed out to me. I very much agree with another response to this thread for a preference for the metal prints. Xpozer colors are simply not even close (in my one trial).
Go to
Apr 30, 2020 21:41:45   #
TerryVS wrote:
Before you puch go on that order take a look at Atlas Packs. They only make two but designed by a shooter with a lot of input by those that wear them everyday.

Terry


I'll second your recommendation to take a look at Atlas. I've used the Atlas Athlete to lug my 30# kit over many trails. It has an excellent waist belt and comfortable shoulder straps. I can usually transfer about 80% of the load to my waist. There are some minor fixes I would suggest they fix but not critical. The load adjuster straps are not as effective as those on a larger (65L) pack b/c, as a necessity of design, they are too close to the shoulder strap junction. 30# is about it for the Atlas Athlete.
Go to
Mar 27, 2020 16:41:39   #
good2gonc wrote:
I know some of you are in a similar situation. You have gone to Sony mirrorless E-Mount (A7RIII/A6500 etc) and have Canon EOS EF or EF-S lenses you want to use.

There are at least 2 major brands of adapters to make that happen. The one I am looking at is the Metabones T Smart adapter 5th Generation. Retails for $399 and used for about $100 or so less.

Then there is the Sigma MC-11 which sells for around $250.00.

So looking at reviews, the Metabones is the better of the two and maybe the best way to go.

Who has which and do they work, worth the money and any down-side to using with a Canon lens.

Thanks in advance.
I know some of you are in a similar situation. You... (show quote)



I bought this one for my a6000. Works great with Canon EF-S 10-22. A little slow but works.
https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DW0EV2I/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o09_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Go to
Mar 23, 2019 12:12:45   #
repleo wrote:
Sony has released a new firmware upgrade for the A6000. Don't expect to get auto eye focus for animals, but it does promise 'optimization' with some lenses that I have.

Good to see that Sony is still supporting the venerable A6000 even though they have three newer versions on the market.


Thanks for posting!
Go to
Mar 11, 2019 13:59:29   #
Picture Taker wrote:
I'm not making a living nor close to that but, I learned one thing, I don't put them on consignment. I have 2 prices retail and wholesale. ie. One 24X36 is $200.00@ and 6 nor more $100.00@. or what have you.


I'd be curious to know what material your 24 x 36 is printed on so that you can sell for $200. I have been using Bay Photo for making 24 x 36 aluminum prints and it costs nearly $250 (at full price) to have one made. They really do great work, though.
Go to
Jan 5, 2019 21:09:34   #
Well said, Linda. And, beautiful images.


Linda From Maine wrote:
I see you have shared many photos of bald eagles and egrets. There is a vocal contingent of folks on UHH who complain about all the bird photos posted here. Ironic?

Since you're relatively new, you may not have had a chance to check out all the features of the site, including "newest pictures" - a link accessible at the top of every page. Those thumbnail images will help you filter out any subjects not of interest. There are also many specialty forums where you will be unlikely to stumble upon moons or sunsets. Click on "all sections" at the bottom of the page to browse.

And lastly, consider hosting a discussion topic about how to make moon or sunset photos something other than "identical." Please join the small group who would like to see UHH be about learning/sharing/teaching/inspiring and don't align with the grumpy old folks who are here only to complain. Let's learn together!
I see you have shared many photos of bald eagles a... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 30, 2018 13:59:52   #
Thanks for the write-up on Gitzo's numbering system. Now I know what my Gitzo 1532 means. It has been a very good tripod even in windy conditions. Lightweight and easy to backpack. I recently had very sharp results in gusty wind with a Tamron 100-400 mounted on a 5D3 at 400mm. I did turn on the image stabilization. I think it helped in this case.

eardoc wrote:
The Gitzo 3531S is a three leg segment, stable, systematic tripod. You may want to consider the Gitzo 3542LS. It is a four leg segment, stable, systematic tripod. (Neither the 3531S or 3542LS have center columns that decrease stability. A center column can be added.) The 3542LS with a tripod head and camera mounted is tall enough for your comfort. You do not have to bend over. The 3542LS has a removable flat top plate that is secured with an incorporated tightening screw and security release button to prevent inadvertent release of the flat plate. You can purchase an extra flat plate if you rapidly want to switch from one tripod head to another (eg. ballhead to gimble). Gitzo has updated the 3542LS to the 3543LS. They made minimal changes in the new model (added a side screw bushing to the head assembly and changed the leg releases at the head). Rubber feet can be pulled off revealing hidden spikes to adapt to different terrain. However, during testing, the 3542LS dampened vibrations better than the newer 3543LS. If you look around, you can still find the 3542LS. For most, it combines light weight, portability, convenience, stability, adaptability, proper height, and no need to purchase another tripod. As a disclaimer, I have no relationship with Gitzo or any photo manufacturer. After a recent tripod search, I just like the tripod.

Gitzo's numbering system is as follows: 3542LS

1. "3" = series 3 tripod
2. "5" = carbon fiber
3. "4" = number of leg segments
4. "2" = model of the tripod (in this case the "2" replaced the original "1" version)
5. "L" = long model
6. "S" = systematic model (vs. for instance the Mountaineer model with a center column)
The Gitzo 3531S is a three leg segment, stable, sy... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 30, 2018 13:18:01   #
Paul J. Svetlik wrote:
I may surprise you, Davet,

but after years of buying high quality hiking boots (shoes) from REI and replacing them in 1-2 years anyway (I hike and backpack a lot) I decided to try something different.
I went to Walmart.
They have a wide variety of boots designed for other activities, but I am sure, you can find there some boots - fitting to your need nicely. They are usually made in China or Brasil and the price is a fraction of what you pay in a sport store.
Your boots have to be comfortable and warm in winter.
The kind I like is in the price range between $40 - $50. I always look for a good lug sole, yellow or light brown color of the synthetic rubber, which doesn't slide easily on a polished floor in the store. I need a good traction on the rocky, sometimes wet terrain.
In about 2-3 years I replace them with a new pair.
I carry a backpack 25-30lb for a day hike and an overnight backpack 50-60+lb. These boots are reasonably waterproofed and I do not need to put any silicone or grease on them.
For longer trips I like to put in some soft insoles.
I use heavy wool socks with light nylon under-socks in every season - both socks are available from REI and other sport stores.
After the trip I spray a germ killing compound like Lysol Spray or similar - inside the boots.
I may surprise you, Davet, br br but after years ... (show quote)


I'm interested in Paul's comments bc I have purchased my Salomon Quest 4D GTX boots from REI. Pricey at $230 but the best boot imaginable for me. Light and rigid they help this old guy pack a 28# load over uneven terrain. They are completely waterproof, too, as I have confirmed by walking through streams. (I need to size up to an 11 1/2 from my normal 10, though.) Sometimes they go on sale, though. I found that Keene's are way too soft for packing a load. I'm going to give Paul's Walmart suggestion a look, however. He sounds like an experienced hiker and if these boots will handle a 30# pack I'm going to check them out. Thanks for the tip.
Go to
Dec 19, 2018 08:04:17   #
I'm using Luminar 3 on a PC and have immediately noticed some issues compared to the Mac version I see used on the video tutorials. The toolbar is missing an item, rotating an image in the Library doesn't work. The "Open" button doesn't have an "Import Images To ... " option. Just getting started but sure like the look of it.
Go to
Oct 10, 2018 16:59:17   #
SWADE wrote:
Looking for photographic opportunities in and around the Seattle area, suggestions greatly appreciated.

mm

This should keep you busy:

http://lighthousefriends.com/light.asp?ID=112
https://www.hikingproject.com/trail/7013499/discovery-park-and-lighthouse-loop
http://seattlephotoadventures.blogspot.com/
https://www.seattlephotographs.com/
http://www.shuttertours.com/our-blog/archives/719
https://botanicgardens.uw.edu/washington-park-arboretum/

Attached file:
(Download)
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.