Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: CHOLLY
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 419 next>>
Jan 13, 2018 00:09:50   #
Sounds more complicated than it SHOULD be. Sorry you had to experiment your way to a solution that SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE OWNERS MANUAL.

But GLAD you got it where you want it.
Go to
Jan 12, 2018 11:20:41   #
I think you just might have to make that call to Adorama.

They have ALWAYS been pretty helpful to me, hopefully they can help you solve your problem.

GOOD LUCK!!!
Go to
Jan 11, 2018 23:04:55   #
So, the camera is definitely set to allow TTL flash and the flash is also set that way?
Go to
Jan 11, 2018 18:58:55   #
What is your setting on the camera?
Go to
Jan 11, 2018 16:36:02   #
^^^As stated earlier, it depends on the specific lens......
Go to
Jan 11, 2018 10:12:10   #
To expand on what has already been said:

It depends on the lenses.

MOST early Sigma Lenses for the Minolta A mount WERE REVERSE ENGINEERED. That means the electronics will work for the cameras they were designed for... BUT NOT NECESSARILY CAMERAS THAT CAME AFTERWARDS.

Additionally, the original Minolta AF lenses were EXCELLENT both in terms of their optical qualities AND their build quality. This was true up and down the entire line-up. HOWEVER, by 1998 the financial status of the company had taken a HUGE hit due to a copyright infringement settlement with Honeywell and build quality was hit or miss across the board.

Design and innovation was there... but the execution in many cases left a lot to be desired.

The MINOLTA AF lenses CAN be used on any Sony A mount camera. They can also be used on Sony's E mount cameras provided the LAEA-2, LAEA-4 adapters are used. Of COURSE what I said earlier about Sigma lenses holds true in this situation as well.

I have NO knowledge of A mount lenses being adapted to either Canon or Nikon cameras. The Maxxum 9 was an EXCELLENT camera... still is in the right hands provided you get a good copy. It was a professional camera with a LOT of features that neither Canon nor Nikon offered at the time.

Please send ME the list...

THANKS!!!
Go to
Jan 5, 2018 19:05:22   #
ToBoldlyGo:

Place your cursor AFTER the quote... that way people will see what you are replying to, rather than reading your reply first in confusion.

For example:

ToBoldlyGo wrote:
You want to mount a huge and heavy lens onto a flat piece of glass?


Like this.


Cheers!
Go to
Jan 4, 2018 11:58:18   #


Some of you guys just LOVE to argue.

IF this were a message board about grammar and it's usage I could understand the nit pickery.

BUT IT AIN'T.

It's a message board about photography.

No one is perfect... something to consider the NEXT TIME the urge to critique a posters grammar leaps to mind. Just make sure before you do that NONE of YOUR posts contain any mistakes others could find fault with.
Go to
Jan 4, 2018 11:20:32   #
mas24 wrote:
I've seen progress in cameras having more megapixels, going back 10 years. A camera with 12.1 megapixels (D700), was considered a lot back then. The improvements in memory cards has been astonishing in the past 10 years. I remember how exciting it was to own a 4gb Lexar SD card. I was blown over when Canon came out with its 50 megapixels camera in their 5Dsr. And when Nikon's D5 came out with a camera that uses dual XQD cards or dual CF cards. That was an advancement. You can get memory cards over 128gb today. Including SD cards. And Nikon's D5 has an ISO capability of 3280000. I said, who would go so high on ISO? Sony was still making DSLRs ten years ago. Now, they don't make them anymore. Only mirrorless and Translucent mirror cameras. Ten years surely makes a difference in photography gear. Stay tuned for the next ten years of progress.
I've seen progress in cameras having more megapixe... (show quote)


EXACTLY!!!
Go to
Jan 4, 2018 02:48:58   #
manpho789 wrote:
@CHOLLY
From the pictures you showed I was assuming they were add-on lenses for iPhones. But as you point out, they are self standing cameras, controlled by an iPhone. That’s an interesting concept. There are many possibilities in things to come and, for me at least, it’s fun to think about.


Yep... but pretty much ANY smartphone that can download Sony's Play Memories App can control them.


Unfortunately that leaves Windows Phone users in the cold... but iPhone and Android owners are good.
Go to
Jan 4, 2018 02:46:48   #
DWU2 wrote:
Not sure I see the value proposition of these devices. The advantage of cell phone photography is that the camera is always with you. Would you always carry these accessories around? Maybe the cost of the accessories is less than that of a self-contained camera?


Dan, I think you missed the point. The Sony QX series is SPECIFICALLY for someone who wishes for more control and better image quality than normally available with just the on-board system of a smartphone... yet is unwilling to lug around either a traditional mirrorless or DSLR camera.

The cost is close to what you would pay for an equally capable traditional camera, but the advantage is in size, weight, and the ability to connect directly to your phone via NFC, Blu-tooth, or WiFi.

So if you... like ME... are happy with carrying your camera for imaging, then no; these products will not appeal to you. But then WE weren't the target consumer, and Sony has been selling these rascals since 2014.
Go to
Jan 3, 2018 16:32:59   #
manpho789 wrote:
The Big lens is desirable, but a cellphone still has tiny sensor. The camera I’m imagining has a big sensor, ASPC-C or FF. It’s a real camera, just shedding the negative attributes of present DSLRs (mirror, mechanical shutter).


None of the Sony's shown above are lenses; they are full blown MIRRORLESS Cameras that you can attach to and control with your smartphone.

The QX1 not only offers and APS-C sized sensor, but interchangeable lenses too.

The other two have fixed lenses with optical zooms of 10X and 100X respectively, and a minimum 1" imaging sensor with 20 megapixels.

NO smartphone at the time these "accessories" went to market or even NOW presents the flexibility or image quality possible with these units... which are ALL small enough to fit in your pocket and weigh just a few ounces.

They offer the best of both worlds.
Go to
Jan 3, 2018 16:00:23   #
wdross wrote:
Too big! Because the market wasn't big enough, Olympus stopped making the O-1A. But if you can find one used or refurbished with the 14-42mm lense, the whole setup is 2.2" dia. X 3" long.


^^^CERTAINLY bigger than the OP suggested. But a great compromise between those who want the portability of cell phone photography with those who wish to have or NEED mirrorless camera flexibility and image quality.

You might say it's a BRIDGE option.
Go to
Jan 3, 2018 14:20:16   #
Yep!
Go to
Jan 3, 2018 14:17:10   #
manpho789 wrote:
I wonder what cameras will be like in, say, 10 years or perhaps less.

The Point and Shoot is dead, with smartphone cameras eclipsing them. Mirrorless makes complete sense, eliminating clunky mechanical stuff. A next step would be entirely electronic shutters, the mechanical shutter being failure prone and having other limitations. That is entirely likely, only quick dumping of the last sensor image (after transfer to buffer) being required. Think how far sensors and semiconductor technology has gone in 10 years. View finders could be eliminated too, with only a real time sensor generated 3” + display showing state of focus, along with various settings and parameters. The bright sunlight objection can be overcome by a detachable viewing hood. That should result in less eye strain and easier composition of the photo.

What all this adds up to is what might be called the “iCamera”. It will be just a flat device that mounts lenses on its front side, and has its view screen on the back side. It might be around 1/2” thick, enough to have a few buttons or wheels on the sides. Details can be argued about, but the electronic shutter, the elimination of the mirror and separate view finder, all adds up to a drastically simpler and lower cost camera. And a more capable and durable one. One might wonder whether Nikon, Canon or Sony would initiate such a product, of if some upstart company does. The big DSLR companies have a dilemma, whether to be first and capture a new camera paradigm, vs undermine their present markets in DSLR cameras.
I wonder what cameras will be like in, say, 10 yea... (show quote)


Check these out:

http://sonyglobal.scene7.com/is/image/gwtprod/7904d9dba27b592d424c3070dcff42cb?fmt=pjpeg&wid=1014&hei=396&bgcolor=F1F5F9&bgc=F1F5F9



https://www.dpreview.com/products/sony/slrs/sony_ilceqx1

https://www.theverge.com/2013/9/27/4774848/sony-cyber-shot-qx10-qx100-review

Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 419 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.