Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: lensenvy
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 18 next>>
Sep 16, 2020 19:42:49   #
jim quist wrote:
Is which one to sit on the front porch with to take pictures of our birds.


My name says it all!
Go to
May 25, 2020 19:21:07   #
Gloucester Mass.


Go to
Sep 1, 2017 19:11:04   #
Thanks everyone! I knew I could count on all of you! The only thing I know so far is that he wants something "better than his cell phone pics". I will find out his budget and also how "into" photography he wants to get. I do not think he is worried about the perfect picture, just something for sharing or saving. I asked him to think about, size, simplicity and cost. I plan on letting him use my D7000 with my 18-200 just as a reference....see if it works for him. Again thanks for all that took the time to respond!

I really appreciate it!

p.s. I have not been shooting for a while. Just got my cameras back from the shop, one lens still there. This fall I plan on shooting and learning light room! First time in 20 years we do not have kids in sports! I will miss it but a little camera time will be great.
Go to
Aug 31, 2017 08:14:18   #
Thanks for your help! I like the speed of the 50mm but I know nothing about the D3400. I will do some more research!


mas24 wrote:
The 50mm prime f1.8 on a DX camera is an inexpensive lens that is great for outdoor soccer from the sidelines. In my community, flash units are banned in gyms for basketball games. You need a fast low light lens for best results. The Tokina 24-70mm f2.8, is an lesser expensive version fast lens good for sports. Remember the FOV on a crop sensor is 1.5X. I'm not a big fan of the D3400, but it is a satisfactory, reliable DSLR.
Go to
Aug 31, 2017 08:12:21   #
Thank you....now that you mention it, I have an 18-200 that I used when I started taking sports pics of my kids.....great for outdoors!

jerryc41 wrote:
The D3400 is entry level, but it's also a capable camera. A limitation would be fps, but five frames per second isn't bad. Depending on the sport and the distance from the action, a longer lens (used/refurbished) might be required. The 18-200mm is a good lens at a reasonable price. This is a situation where the skill of the person using the camera makes a big difference.
Go to
Aug 31, 2017 08:10:28   #
I agree, I do not know enough about how invested in photography they want to get. I think its just to get better than cell phone pics of the kids soccer games. I appreciate your suggestions, thanks so much!



Notorious T.O.D. wrote:
We need more information as to what sports and their budget. Otherwise many cameras could in fact be used. I shot sports and motocross 15 years ago with a 2mp digital Rebel. I got some nice shots. You can get a Canon 1D Mk III in good condition for probably $500. Or tens of other options. For a DSLR you are going to want at least an 85 mm or longer lens even if you are right beside the action. Most any camera that can stop the action can be made to work. You need to be better at anticipating the action with slower fps. Setting white balance is important if you are shooting jpeg. Best to shoot raw and post process more in my experience. More information is needed though...especially budget...

Best,
Todd Ferguson
We need more information as to what sports and the... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 31, 2017 08:08:16   #
Thanks, those are both great suggestions. I think the point and shoot may be the best way. I appreciate the info and the links!

jccash wrote:
I just thought of another camera option but I have no experience with it. Have a friend who loves his Nikon P900. Lots of reach. Not sure how fast it is.


http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1127274-REG
Go to
Aug 31, 2017 08:06:13   #
Thanks, I will look for a used 70-300!

CHG_CANON wrote:
What sports and how close? 50mm on a D3400 might prove to be too short to capture action. What brands are being considered? Buying used equipment would also be an entry-level approach, such as a used D7200 and a used Nikon 70-300mm VR G. These would be more expensive than the D3400, but would be a better fit for the action aspect of 'sports pics' than the D3400 with a 50mm. The 70-300 zoom also would pair with any of Nikon's bodies including the D3400 entry-level model.
Go to
Aug 30, 2017 22:13:19   #
Thanks. I did that for point and shoot but I am not sure if that is the way to go. The D3400 is a good suggestion with maybe a 50mm 1.8?


kpmac wrote:
Maybe a Nikon D3400? Not the fastest in frames per second, but decent for entry level. There are limitations with any entry level camera. Try a Google search for "entry level sports camera". Perhaps that will help.
Go to
Aug 30, 2017 22:01:49   #
Someone asked me to recommend an entry level camera for shooting sports. Mostly outdoor but some indoor this winter. Not too expensive. I am at a loss.... Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Go to
Oct 9, 2016 09:50:04   #
Gorgeous!
Go to
Apr 13, 2016 22:59:48   #
http://mentalfloss.com/us/go/68471
Go to
Apr 3, 2016 10:59:18   #
brittainsas1 wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, that's Jonathan Livingston, and he's known to bring his buddies along......Be careful with your car paint.....one good tern deserves another !


:lol:
Go to
Apr 2, 2016 12:40:27   #
Thanks Moxie!

Moxie wrote:
A nice capture!
Go to
Apr 2, 2016 12:39:20   #
Thanks Linda!
Linda From Maine wrote:
That is funny! Love the shot.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 18 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.