Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: digiman
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 21 next>>
Aug 3, 2013 10:03:50   #
RixPix wrote:
In celebration of Mr. Boner's wonderfully effective Republican led House of Representatives 40 attempt of repealing the Affordable Care Act I thought I would put some needles in the eyes of those on this board who through their own willful ignorance complain about the Affordable Care Act.

4O REASONS TO LOVE OBAMACARE

1. Say goodbye to lifetime limits: Insurance companies will no longer be able to place an arbitrary cap on coverage.

2. Children can no longer be denied health insurance because of a pre-existing condition.

3. Starting in 2014, adults will no longer be denied health insurance because of a pre-existing condition.

Free preventive care, including:

4. Annual check-ups

5. Contraception

6. Vaccinations

7. Gestational diabetes screenings

8. Mammograms

9. Screening and counselling for HIV

10. Cholesterol screenings

11. Colonoscopies

12. Blood pressure screenings

13. Cancer screenings

14. Osteoporosis screenings

15. Young adults can stay on their parents' insurance plans until the age of 26.

16. If insurance companies aren't spending your premium dollars on your health care—at least 80 percent—they've got to give you some money back.

17. Insurance companies can't raise your rates by double-digits without justification.

18. Insurance plans can’t require higher co-payments or co-insurance if you get emergency care from an out-of-network hospital.

19. Women will no longer be charged more than men just because they're women.

20. The health insurance marketplace will be ready to go in every state starting October 1 of this year.

21. No-hassle comparisons: The online marketplace provides easy access to information on all available plans, so you can do a side-by-side comparison and find a plan that works for you.

22. Many Americans will be eligible for financial assistance to help them buy health insurance on their own, so you can afford a plan that will be there if you get sick.

23. When you buy insurance through the marketplace, premiums can be determined based only on these four factors: where you live, how old your are, how large your family is, and whether or not you are a smoker.

24. In the marketplace, you can choose a plan that matches your budget and needs: Platinum, Gold, Silver or Bronze.

25. By 2020, the Medicare prescriptions drug "donut hole" will be closed for good.

These are the essential benefits that all health plans in the marketplace must cover:

26. Ambulatory patient services

27. Emergency services

28. Hospitalization

29. Prenatal care

30. Neonatal care

31. Mental health services

32. Prescription drugs

33. Rehabilitative services and devices

34. Laboratory services like bloodwork

35. Preventive care

36. Wellness services

37. Chronic disease management

38. Pediatric services, including oral and vision care

39. Lower prescription drug costs for people on Medicare.

40. These states are already foreseeing dramatic drops in premiums: New York, California, Nevada, Connecticut, Oregon.

There you have it. 40 ways Obamacare is helping and will help Americans—benefits the House of Representatives is about to try to take away for the 40th time.
In celebration of Mr. Boner's wonderfully effectiv... (show quote)


It's not just Republicans who are having issues with this program but some Democrats like Baucus who says it is a train wreck in the making.
Go to
Aug 3, 2013 09:53:34   #
jerryc41 wrote:
We all love to see the UPS truck arriving, but they occasionally use something called SurePost. It should be called EventuallyPost. They take delivery of the package and bring it to your local post office. Then it gets delivered by your regular mail carrier. The problem is that this can delay the shipment by a day or more.

I was tracking a UPS delivery, and it said it went to my post office. When it still hadn't been delivered by the next day, I went to my PO. "We don't have it." I emailed UPS. "Your Post Office has it." When I didn't receive it the next day, I went to my PO. "We don't have it." It arrived the following day. I have a package on the way now (not photographic) that is scheduled to be delivered by Monday. I'm not holding my breath.
We all love to see the UPS truck arriving, but the... (show quote)


This is why they are losing billions every year.
Go to
Aug 3, 2013 09:53:33   #
jerryc41 wrote:
We all love to see the UPS truck arriving, but they occasionally use something called SurePost. It should be called EventuallyPost. They take delivery of the package and bring it to your local post office. Then it gets delivered by your regular mail carrier. The problem is that this can delay the shipment by a day or more.

I was tracking a UPS delivery, and it said it went to my post office. When it still hadn't been delivered by the next day, I went to my PO. "We don't have it." I emailed UPS. "Your Post Office has it." When I didn't receive it the next day, I went to my PO. "We don't have it." It arrived the following day. I have a package on the way now (not photographic) that is scheduled to be delivered by Monday. I'm not holding my breath.
We all love to see the UPS truck arriving, but the... (show quote)


This is why they are losing billions every year.
Go to
Jun 3, 2013 22:37:05   #
jimmya wrote:
Could be, who knows. 108 today... getting on towards summer and that lovely 115 or so.


And you folks are still breathing?
Go to
May 24, 2013 07:49:06   #
LarJgrip wrote:
Could someone please enlighten me as to the best approach regarding digitizing and/or restoring old photos keeping in mind that there may be a need for some PP also, thank you.

~Larry


Any photo store can put them onto a cd and then you can do your post processing.
Go to
May 24, 2013 07:33:37   #
STVest wrote:
Something I wasn’t aware of until recently: I never stand still; I bob and weave all over the place. I first noticed this after I purchased my dSLR and it became dramatically more obvious when I purchased the longer lenses. It isn’t just camera shake from unsteady hands - my whole freakin’ body reels.

I’ve tried the hints about bracing yourself against something (not always available), holding your breath, arms tucked in tight. I’ve tried a monopod - but it just dances with me. Previously, the point-and-shoots that I owned were virtually never used because I could never get a shot that was focused. Now I’m thinking it wasn’t a focusing problem. I do use a tripod for the longer lenses, but I find macro photography also challenging. I don’t want to have to use a tripod for every shot! And I was also hoping to occasionally be able to make hand-held shots with the longer lenses.

So. What to do?

Should I stop taking my meds? Double up on them? Or embrace the bob-and-weave, ditch photography, and take up boxing?
Something I wasn’t aware of until recently: I neve... (show quote)


Do both, boxing and photography at the same time. You never know what kind of wild photography that might produce.
Go to
May 17, 2013 07:37:19   #
2da4est wrote:
I am an amateur photographer. Can I get some advice on how to improve this type of shot please? I am trying to get more detail in the feathers of the bird shots I take. I use a Nikon d7000. This shot was taken with a 70-300 f4.5-5.6g I was shooting shutter priority at 1/1000 I kept it there because some of my shots were in flight and I was hand holding the camera. iso 400 due to the overcast morning. I think the problem is lighting but I would think that using a flash on these guys would not be a good thing. I am trying to decide, do I just hate this camera or am I just that bad and need to quit this hobby.
The photo I am attaching is as shot.
I am an amateur photographer. Can I get some advi... (show quote)


Don't quit the hobby. We have all been there and with more practice you can do it. With the photos that you posted they all need to be cropped in tighter whether through the camera via lenses or through post processing. Keep shooting and it will happen.
Go to
May 10, 2013 07:57:23   #
Makaipi wrote:
Digiman, I also was raised in a Law Enforcement family. My Dad was a Chief in a small town in the Northeast. I can remember getting shot at a couple of times when I was with him in one particular incident where the" source within " was the ammo from his Sam Brown. Had absolutely no time to throw any kind of fairness doctrine at the perp. God bless those who don't like guns for that is their decision. And the Police Officer has to protect them from the bad guys. But there is a time when a person is responsible for their own protection. When a given group of people say that I cannot acquire the tools necessary to protect my family, friends or personhood, they can pound sand.
Digiman, I also was raised in a Law Enforcement fa... (show quote)


I agree wholeheartedly. I own a weapon and will protect my family and can't stand the liberal bent that some of these posters on here present.
Go to
May 9, 2013 14:10:39   #
F16 Club wrote:
digiman]
good as that happened, forewarned is forearmed, who can guarantee the reverse?
What do you think will happen if unemployment continue risen and people go to store to get food?


I'm not understanding your reply.
Go to
May 9, 2013 12:48:22   #
DennisK wrote:
Yes but one problem with your statement. The government has no power to give anyone rights. Our rights are natural, just because you're a citizen.


I agree with you.
Go to
May 9, 2013 12:41:20   #
yamini7 wrote:
WAY TO GO PNAGY...But I think you need to speak into their listening...they just don't have an ear for these kind of facts. You're talking way over their heads and all they can do is resort to insults and cartoons. That's the level of intelligence you're dealing with here except for a few who are sincere and want to learn as Digiman and a couple of others.


I'm open to any debates and logical thinking which makes each one of the individuals on here worthwhile posters. I'm not here to dissuade any individuals beliefs or thoughts just interested in seeing different points of view. I believe this issue of gun ownership is one that will never be agreed upon.
Go to
May 9, 2013 12:19:23   #
PNagy wrote:
Once again, you resort to the illogical, but emotionally appealing tactic of looking at data from part of the issue, instead of the issue as a whole. Chicago is not a self-contained polity, like a province, or better yet, a nation state. That means guns can flow into Chicago from surrounding communities, and in fact that is what is happening.

"Most of the guns that come into Chicago are from out of state or from parts of Illinois where gun control laws are not so strict. More than 400 guns were traced to Mississippi, where many of those whose families immigrated to Chicago in the early 20th century may remain. Rather than serving as an argument against gun control (one that could certainly be countered by the murder rate in Louisiana), Chicago serves as a call to a national, regulated gun control policy. " (http://www.redstate.com/politicalwoman/2013/04/14/gun-control-chicago-style-or-bring-a-bat-to-the-fight/)

Another aspect of the situation around which you skirt is the actual penalty for gun law violation in Chicago, which is enough to deter generally law abiding people from violating it, but not hardened criminals. A respectable man would be crushed by a typical sentence of one year in prison with an average of six months actually served, whereas to a criminal it is the cost of doing business.

Garry F. McCarthy, Chicago Police Superintendent: "Chicago may have comprehensive gun laws, but they are not strict because the sanctions don't exist."

Finally, you have not bothered to read up on gun control laws that have succeeded. If Chicago were a self contained polity, it would be too early to write off the effect of its laws anyway, because they have long term, not immediate effects. Chicago's gun control laws were passed in 2010. At first there is little or no effect. After several years the number of guns begins to diminish, along with the gun violence. In ten years the effect is dramatic. It has been less than three years since Chicago passed its current gun control laws.

You are not interested in determining the truth; you merely grab those arguments you can twist into supporting your desire to have no restriction on gun ownership. You refuse to look at the overall situation in an objective manner. I'll give you this, though; you persist through wind and rain. You are impervious to unlimited refutations of your wild west values.
Once again, you resort to the illogical, but emoti... (show quote)


My desire to have no gun restriction is a statement without merit. I believe our country needs to have gun laws and that everyone who carries needs to abide by the law.
Go to
May 9, 2013 12:11:21   #
PNagy wrote:
This is yet another example of specious logic, which is the absolute best you offer. A city is not a self contained polity. Regardless its gun control laws, guns can flow in from communities around it. When the self-contained polity, the nation or the state, passes and adheres to gun control laws, the number of guns drops, and so does the murder rate. Your position is untenable, therefore instead of arguing the Rosetta Stone for understanding an issue, you nibble at the periphery.


There is no nibbling at the periphery since that is the truth about Chicago.
Go to
May 9, 2013 12:08:04   #
PNagy wrote:
You enigmatically cover one non sequitur with another. It is not a matter of what I believe; it is facts. First, it is a fact that all murder is crime. It is also a fact that when the number of guns diminishes, so does the murder rate. Whether I believe it or not, apparently fewer guns are available for crime. With no guns in circulation, no gun is available for crime.


I can agree with you in that if there are less guns there will be less gun crimes but then you can say the same about all the other implements of danger out there.
Go to
May 9, 2013 11:48:46   #
PNagy wrote:
Everyone in the NRA believes in the Constitution? What exactly do you mean by believing in the Constitution? How have you determined that the NRA members as a block share in this belief?


I can't speak for a lot of the members of the NRA since I'm not a member but I believe a lot of gun owners believe in what the second amendment grants the Unites States citizen.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 21 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.