Once again, you resort to the illogical, but emotionally appealing tactic of looking at data from part of the issue, instead of the issue as a whole. Chicago is not a self-contained polity, like a province, or better yet, a nation state. That means guns can flow into Chicago from surrounding communities, and in fact that is what is happening.
"Most of the guns that come into Chicago are from out of state or from parts of Illinois where gun control laws are not so strict. More than 400 guns were traced to Mississippi, where many of those whose families immigrated to Chicago in the early 20th century may remain. Rather than serving as an argument against gun control (one that could certainly be countered by the murder rate in Louisiana), Chicago serves as a call to a national, regulated gun control policy. " (
http://www.redstate.com/politicalwoman/2013/04/14/gun-control-chicago-style-or-bring-a-bat-to-the-fight/)
Another aspect of the situation around which you skirt is the actual penalty for gun law violation in Chicago, which is enough to deter generally law abiding people from violating it, but not hardened criminals. A respectable man would be crushed by a typical sentence of one year in prison with an average of six months actually served, whereas to a criminal it is the cost of doing business.
Garry F. McCarthy, Chicago Police Superintendent: "Chicago may have comprehensive gun laws, but they are not strict because the sanctions don't exist."
Finally, you have not bothered to read up on gun control laws that have succeeded. If Chicago were a self contained polity, it would be too early to write off the effect of its laws anyway, because they have long term, not immediate effects. Chicago's gun control laws were passed in 2010. At first there is little or no effect. After several years the number of guns begins to diminish, along with the gun violence. In ten years the effect is dramatic. It has been less than three years since Chicago passed its current gun control laws.
You are not interested in determining the truth; you merely grab those arguments you can twist into supporting your desire to have no restriction on gun ownership. You refuse to look at the overall situation in an objective manner. I'll give you this, though; you persist through wind and rain. You are impervious to unlimited refutations of your wild west values.
Once again, you resort to the illogical, but emoti... (