Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: beverett
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 24 next>>
Mar 8, 2016 11:11:26   #
Both the bottoms and Quivera are easily accessible and good for birds.




Go to
Mar 5, 2016 11:48:21   #
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/news/peeled-oranges-in-plastic-pulled-by-whole-foods-after-social-media-outrage-a6911611.html
Go to
Feb 8, 2016 11:35:32   #
Doornail, not doorknob.
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 12:20:20   #
sarge69 wrote:
Maintenance People with a sense of humor


Just in case you needed a laugh: Remember it takes a college degree to fly a plane, but only a high school diploma to fix one; that's reassurance to those of us who fly routinely.


Sarge69


Old but good. However, it doesn't take a college degree to fly an airplane.
Go to
Oct 18, 2015 16:58:16   #
wj cody wrote:
poets and writers of books (short stories, novels, non-fiction) usually avoid working directly on the computer. where they can, they will usually hand write, on paper, with pencil, their first couple of drafts, editing as they go along. you would be surprised how many of these authors then go to a typewriter for their 4th or even 5th drafts, before entering their work on computer.
the reason seems to be the typewriter allows for pausing and editing as the work is typed. therefore, fewer, if any errors, wind up in the final work.

with the advent of computers and cold type, especially in newspapers, the levels of proof reading have disappeared. so, no copy editor, no lineotyper and no proof reader who sat along with the lineotypest, and finally the people who "dummied" up the pages. as for the last, this word comes from the time when composing rooms hired deaf mutes to make up the pages. they were referred to as "dummies". in my days at the paper i worked at, i cannot tell you how many hours i spent in the composing room and how much i learned from these people. they were valuable and i found, thanks to them, i could read the lead copy upside down and backwards. they were some of my most memorable teachers, and i still miss them all.
poets and writers of books (short stories, novels,... (show quote)


Wow, Cody, you must be hanging out with ghosts. Those of us who write books, essays and the like long ago abandoned the typewriter. It is much easier to edit and revise one's work on a computer. (Poets may be another story.)

As for "dummies" and composing rooms, anyone who has worked at a newspaper can tell you that a page dummy is merely a schematic showing where stories go on a page. Computer pagination systems eliminated the need for page dummies. There were no deaf compositors at any of the newspapers where I worked.

Anyone who has worked in a hot type composing room can read type upside down and backwards--a useless skill now.

As I mentioned earlier, proofreaders are not needed because there is no longer the middleman, the Linotype operator, and proofs of his work. Writing is transmitted directly to the publication, and any errors are those of the author. However, most book authors and some other writers do receive what can be called a proof, but those are to provide final checks against editing changes and other random errors.
Go to
Oct 17, 2015 18:19:56   #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
What's the term for the people who catch tech/factual errors? Like Patterson having his cops flicking the safety on and off on their Glocks?


News editors or copy editors or both, depending on the organization.
Go to
Oct 17, 2015 14:34:50   #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
Most of the big publishers have gotten rid of proofreading, both for grammar and spelling, and for fact/technical checking. James Patterson is probably the best-selling junk author in the world, but his police protagonists are running around San Francisco, with their fingers on the triggers of their Glocks, while "they flick the safety off" on their Glocks.


Proofreaders went out with the Linotype. Before computers, a writer's copy would be typeset in lead. The resulting "galley" or galleys would then be inked and printed. The writer's original manuscript, along with the galleys, would be sent to a proofreader, whose job it was to make sure the typeset matched the manuscript--"proof" that the typesetter had done a proper job. Errors--and there were usually a few--would be marked on the proof and sent back to the typesetter for correction.

Proofreaders were not responsible for pointing out errors of fact, grammar, spelling or logic. Those tasks were and still are the job of editors, who also write newspaper headlines.

Bottom line: because computers eliminated the need for "proofs," there are no longer "proofreaders."
Go to
Oct 17, 2015 11:29:28   #
Proofreaders don't edit or change stories. Their job is to make sure the type conforms to the material submitted. Copy editors write headlines and check copy for errors. Unfortunately they are among the first to be laid off as newspapers shrink.
Go to
Jul 18, 2015 20:04:59   #
Bingo! Apaflo has it right!
Go to
Jul 18, 2015 13:45:27   #
photoman022 wrote:
I am not a lawyer, though I play one on TV. My advice: consult a lawyer in your jurisdiction. Maybe your local talk radio station has an "Ask the Lawyer" program (usually on weekends) call in for free advice.

If someone does sue and you go into court and say, "The people on Ugly Hedgehog said it was okay to do it," there will be long and loud laughter.


Do you think news photographers get releases or consult a lawyer every time they shoot a crowd in public? The long and loud laughter would come from a competent lawyer--right after he charges more than you make playing one.
Go to
Jul 18, 2015 11:14:59   #
Wrong. Unless it is used for commercial purposes such as advertising, no release is needed. If it's news or art, it's yours to sell, post or hang on your wall.
Go to
May 8, 2015 11:19:52   #
I have an HP Photosmart, a Canon Pro 9000 Mark II and an Epson Pro 3800. The HP is not good for photos and is used only for letters and such. The Canon produces good color and is used mostly for proofs, family snapshots and greeting cards. The Epson produces excellent color and is used for archival quality prints on paper and canvas.

The HP and Canon use dyes, which will fade, sometimes over a rather short time, depending on exposure to UV. The Epson uses pigments, which are long lasting and will not fade anytime within my lifetime.

All prints for that I sell are produced on the Epson.
Go to
Mar 16, 2015 19:28:48   #
Just checked a CD recorded 9 years ago. Raw files. They all look good.
Go to
Jan 19, 2015 23:55:55   #
Peterff wrote:
That may be a valid position, but is it worth pursuing in this thread?

Is there any further point? Is this the right place?


Nothing further. The thread was about TSA, x-rays, cards and film. Don't x-ray your film, don't worry about the cards and don't trust the government. End.
Go to
Jan 19, 2015 22:59:01   #
Peterff wrote:
Does this have a resolution?

Is it Canons at thirty paces? Sonys at thirty paces, Hand-to-hand with Nikons, or would it take cannons at thirty paces?

Or perhaps, Gentlemen, you could lay down your weapons?


Peterff, you indeed are a voice of reason.

But the only sane way to do battle with the government is to expose lies and ineptitude. The TSA is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people. I'm doing my best to bring this truth to the multitudes who line up like sheep at airports thinking they are "safe" from those who seek to do us harm. Look for an upcoming documentary.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 24 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.