Posts for: IBM
Jun 10, 2018 15:42:50 #
SteveR wrote:
Interesting article. RAW requires anticipation vs. jpeg burst shooting.
One question that I have about using RAW for sports, including indoor gym sports, is if it would allow one to shoot at a lower exposure (shutter speed/aperture/ISO) that could be boosted in p/p, thus eliminating noise from the start.
http://www.peachpit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=2133531&seqNum=2
One question that I have about using RAW for sports, including indoor gym sports, is if it would allow one to shoot at a lower exposure (shutter speed/aperture/ISO) that could be boosted in p/p, thus eliminating noise from the start.
http://www.peachpit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=2133531&seqNum=2
I would say so ,both my cameras I have set in raw ten years ago ,you can pull more out if need be , it's pointless to use any other
Maybe if your running out of card space and have a few more photo to take . I never run out , I have a belt pack that has at least
8 in it, every time I take a camera it's on my belt .
Jun 8, 2018 19:23:32 #
GrandmaG wrote:
My first “real” camera was a Canon, probably because of reputation and I still have it. When I went digital, I was torn between Canon & Nikon. The Nikon felt better in my hands and was just a step ahead of the Canon at the time. Now I have too many lenses to consider switching and I’ve been very happy with my choice
There good enough to make full length feature films for the silver screen , hay! That's all ready been done with the Nikon.
By a well known director.
Jun 8, 2018 13:37:21 #
canon Lee wrote:
Correct!
The same thing was going on in the fifties and sixties etc , with cars, my Chevy is better than your ford ,the fuel for that
Is there was no competition hardly , you heard it every day in school , on the street ,but you never hear it today ,
The difference is that there is only four contenders worth considering, Nik, Can, Olmp, Pentax,, if there ever is the choice
Equal to that of car brands , all that mine is better than yours will be history
Jun 8, 2018 12:13:18 #
Tom Daniels wrote:
i believe the Canon big telephotos are the go to lens for high end sports photography. I do see more Canon's on video shoots
and in a studio I was in the other day. Remember Canon is really in the photography, video equipment (like the C500 series ) and
their lens are used in cinema shoots. The whole video movement with DSLR's started with he Canon's.
Nikon does make other lens products but is not a major supplier like Canon.
and in a studio I was in the other day. Remember Canon is really in the photography, video equipment (like the C500 series ) and
their lens are used in cinema shoots. The whole video movement with DSLR's started with he Canon's.
Nikon does make other lens products but is not a major supplier like Canon.
Then why is is it that Nikon came out with the first SLR WITH video the. D90
Jun 7, 2018 19:58:13 #
traveler90712 wrote:
Who cares? br The first camera you bought; why did... (show quote)
For sure I agree with every thing here , anyway it makes no difference to what ever type that a U.H.Hogger would buy .
There is none bought in the same price ranges that would make one ioota of a difference to his pictures from nikon, canon
Olympus, sony, Pentax, , if you were a pro you may find a difference in the most costly ,but not in the run of the mill
$600 to $2700 , any one bought for the same price , would more likely be saddled with the same operation and features. Tell
Some one puts a cool thing in one model, then has king tell next year , then every one has it , tell the next thing comes along .
Jun 7, 2018 15:50:09 #
dpullum wrote:
Well, humm, static? Every day school photo? Wow, as tho adding trees makes it dynamic... and the vaguely condemning phrases like "every day" insults the photographer! If you are going to criticize, then be technical, if you are capable... discuss, back ground, composition, exposure, etc.... I forgive you... considering you have some limitations viewing with your Samsung pad
Well the name of the game is every one has a view , good bad indifferent , if we all had the same view . Can you imagine if there was only two views on this whole planet. Say half of man kind were the same view as mother Teresa and the other half were
Jeffery Domer , you can only imagine what any art work would look like , but then it would make no difference to the minds
Of the two like minds , or they would be highly critical of the one who painted or shot the photos indifferent to there's.
SOME thing like canon and Nikon fans ,
Jun 7, 2018 15:10:36 #
IBM wrote:
You mean I beat every one ?? even you, that is a complement for sure
Just type in. Thom Hogan Tripod 101. And you will get more tripod info that you can handle .
Jun 6, 2018 17:00:10 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
Many people prefer to spend their time taking pictures, and may even hate computers. I admit to only becoming hooked on pp after I joined UHH and I also admit to having stalled a few years back so I now know "just enough" to be happy :sm02
All the best in your own journey!
All the best in your own journey!
Most pic posted here are not bad in the expouser end part of the deal . Most fall flat in the placement ,and other things that are missed , like the peanut eaters blue spot on back among other things ,you have to think like a artest painting , the great ones
Only paint in what is conducive to the image at hand , the photo artest must take all that in , in a very short time frame ,it's hard to do ,that is what the deleat is for ,but when you get it right , once in a blue moon , it's like the dog who got the bone , I haven't
Got two many of those,
Jun 6, 2018 13:54:24 #
d3200prime wrote:
The D7200 deal fell through but I did end up with a great deal on a D7100. Now the learning of it begins but should be easier with two years of D3200 under my belt. Thanks to all the input.
Just read all on this subject ,I agree with most every one , but hold out for the d7200 it's a better one than the d7100
It lacks a couple things that the d7200 has ,
Jun 6, 2018 13:16:16 #
d3200prime wrote:
Yet another useless post.
You mean I beat every one ?? even you, that is a complement for sure
Jun 5, 2018 14:14:28 #
swartfort wrote:
My backyard has been an amazing place to grab some... (show quote)
How much will be different for each person , the person looking will decide , it's called taste )
Jun 5, 2018 14:02:50 #
Tom DePuy wrote:
One of my first tries taking a photo with my new phone.....
Just made the purchase of a Samsung S9+ phone....
Not to shabby for a phone, but I enjoy my Nikon much more for taking photo's...
Just made the purchase of a Samsung S9+ phone....
Not to shabby for a phone, but I enjoy my Nikon much more for taking photo's...
Now try and make a phone call with your new camera , it's coming
Jun 5, 2018 13:47:32 #
dpullum wrote:
Well, just remove the shoulder and half her hair on that side... on his side crop close to his ear and then bring the bottom up to just below the dark V in her shirt. drop is the easiest and most important tool you have. The green has been desaturated and luminosity reduced. You care about the people... they are the story... all modifications done with simple tools that most any edit program has.
It looks static now like a every day school photo, it had more life before this , imo
Jun 4, 2018 17:14:19 #
T-minus wrote:
Yes, but if the Kirkland were always stiff and uncomfortable throughout their lifespan compared to the Levi’s which were snug and wonderful; are the Kirkland’s still better? Or maybe just a better value?
Never noticed that at all, I have thick skin,
Jun 4, 2018 16:55:00 #
IBM wrote:
I expanded the frame all way around tell there was no frame, like cropping it to the size of my pad looks a lot better with out all that faded yellow mustered colour
I read years ago about how common it was to see a married couple , who look rowas they could be brother and sister , me and
My wife have been mistaken for that , and when I looked at all my marred friends at least half of them looked enough alike
To be bro and sis